Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

(Rumour) Maple Leafs Have Interest In Erik Gudbranson


Bo53Horvat

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, shiznak said:

I don't think anyone is really low-balling Gudbranson's trade value. Jeff Petry (a pending UFA), who plays a similar role as Gudbranson, was traded for a 2nd, and 5th. Brendan Smith was traded last year, in a similar package.

So, to be clear, you'd trade Gudbranson for Brendan Smith or Jeff Petry?   

 

And here's the additional irony:

 

Jeff Petry has a 6yr x 5.5 million contract.

Brendan Smith 4 years x 4.35

 

Those are the types of terms people are cringing about, as if Gudbranson aint worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, oldnews said:

So, to be clear, you'd trade Gudbranson for Brendan Smith or Jeff Petry?   

 

And here's the additional irony:

 

Jeff Petry has a 6yr x 5.5 million contract.

Brendan Smith 4 years x 4.35

 

Those are the types of terms people are cringing about, as if Gudbranson aint worth it.

The Smith deal is more appealing to me. As he ages Guddy will struggle more and more with foot speed, plus the type of game he plays will wear on him more. Not that he hasnt been injured a ton for us already

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, VIC_CITY said:

Martin is one of the best in the league at what he does. Dorsett has a ton of heart but I'm not sure he's much of a deterent. I also thought Dorsett was a bit overpaid in both term and salary at the time of his signing, although it turned out to be ok in the long term. Whereas the Martin we see today is the Martin we've seen for years, so I think the contract he signed was pretty much as expected and if anything, he's outperformed his contract. So Martin>Dorsett...and Martin + cap space > Gudbranson. IMO of course.

Matt Martin is an 8 minute / game, 12th man.

Not a single Leaf who touches the ice less frequently.

 

  Scoring Goals Assists     Ice Time Point Shares          
Rk Player Age Pos GP G A PTS +/- PIM EV PP SH GW EV PP SH S S% TOI ATOI
OPS DPS PS BLK HIT FOW FOL FO%
  Team Total     35 115 183 298 53 256 91 23 1 19 137 44 2 1061 10.8     20.7 17.1 45.9 488 741 1119 1076 51.0
1 Frederik Andersen 28 G 29 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0   1746 60:13 0.0 0.0 6.8 0 0 0 0  
2 Curtis McElhinney 34 G 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   353 58:47 0.0 0.0 1.3 0 0 0 0  
3 Nikita Zaitsev 26 D 34 4 6 10 8 21 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 36 11.1 777 22:51 0.5 2.1 2.6 94 64 0 0  
4 Jake Gardiner 27 D 35 2 13 15 1 18 1 1 0 0 8 5 0 46 4.3 783 22:22 0.8 1.6 2.4 43 15 0 0  
5 Ron Hainsey 36 D 35 2 13 15 6 12 2 0 0 1 12 0 1 31 6.5 765 21:52 0.9 1.9 2.8 70 43 0 0  
6 Morgan Rielly 23 D 35 4 18 22 -4 6 3 1 0 0 10 8 0 79 5.1 753 21:30 1.8 1.1 3.0 38 17 0 0  
7 Auston Matthews 20 C 26 13 13 26 13 2 11 2 0 2 9 4 0 80 16.3 483 18:35 2.8 1.0 3.7 28 5 159 131 54.8
8 Zach Hyman 25 C 35 6 12 18 9 18 6 0 0 1 11 0 1 62 9.7 615 17:34 0.8 1.0 1.8 24 55 27 36 42.9
9 Patrick Marleau 38 LW 35 12 7 19 0 8 11 1 0 5 5 2 0 85 14.1 589 16:50 1.6 0.6 2.2 8 41 95 80 54.3
10 Leo Komarov 31 C 35 4 4 8 1 15 2 1 1 0 3 1 0 50 8.0 581 16:36 -0.4 0.6 0.2 29 106 50 53 48.5
11 Nazem Kadri 27 C 35 13 10 23 5 16 10 3 0 0 6 4 0 85 15.3 579 16:33 2.2 0.8 2.9 12 48 233 239 49.4
12 William Nylander 21 C 35 6 16 22 10 4 4 2 0 2 12 4 0 82 7.3 574 16:24 1.3 1.0 2.3 3 13 141 119 54.2
13 Roman Polak 31 D 16 1 2 3 3 14 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 13 7.7 253 15:48 0.1 0.7 0.8 23 35 0 0  
14 Connor Brown 24 RW 35 9 5 14 -2 6 8 1 0 2 5 0 0 46 19.6 548 15:40 0.9 0.5 1.3 14 9 34 49 41.0
15 Mitch Marner 20 C 35 3 21 24 -3 8 1 2 0 1 15 6 0 67 4.5 545 15:34 1.3 0.4 1.7 14 13 29 28 50.9
16 Tyler Bozak 31 C 34 7 11 18 -1 12 6 1 0 2 6 5 0 64 10.9 511 15:01 1.2 0.5 1.7 6 17 225 229 49.6
17 James van Riemsdyk 28 LW 34 16 9 25 -5 20 9 7 0 1 4 5 0 89 18.0 487 14:19 3.0 0.3 3.2 11 18 0 1 0.0
18 Connor Carrick 23 D 18 2 2 4 9 10 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 19 10.5 250 13:52 0.3 1.2 1.5 23 13 0 0  
19 Andreas Borgman 22 D 33 2 6 8 3 16 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 34 5.9 455 13:48 0.5 1.1 1.6 23 79 0 0  
20 Calle Rosen 23 D 4 0 1 1 -3 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0.0 51 12:47 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0 1 0 0  
21 Josh Leivo 24 LW 10 1 1 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 17 5.9 112 11:10 0.0 0.1 0.2 3 2 3 0 100.0
22 Eric Fehr 32 C 4 0 0 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.0 44 10:56 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 2 2 17 20 45.9
23 Dominic Moore 37 C 26 4 5 9 2 6 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 24 16.7 283 10:54 0.6 0.4 0.9 10 23 100 88 53.2
24 Kasperi Kapanen 21 RW 5 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 15.4 54 10:53 0.3 0.1 0.3 0 10 0 1 0.0
25 Nikita Soshnikov 24 RW 3 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   31 10:26 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 2 5 0 1 0.0
26 Matt Martin 28 LW 33 2 7 9 3 34 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 30 6.7 273 8:17 0.4 0.4 0.8 8 107 6 1 85.7

 

 

https://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/TOR/2018.html

 

Dorsett was playing twice the minutes, shutdown minutes, with 29% offensive zone starts, and scored 7 goals in 20 games in that role, including 2 shorthanded, matching Matt Martin while penalty killing.

 

Martin has been healthy scratched this year,  and relatively ineffective - but you believe he's outperforming his contract and that Martin + cap space > Gudbranson....

 

Wow.  I have no idea how you could arrive at that opinion.

Both Gudbranson and Dorsett are multiples better hockey players than Matt Martin - and I'd take Gudbranson in a bout with Martin 9 times out of 10.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Yotes said:

The Smith deal is more appealing to me. As he ages Guddy will struggle more and more with foot speed, plus the type of game he plays will wear on him more. Not that he hasnt been injured a ton for us already

So...you're from the future?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

It’s unlikely they re-sign him to what he can get on the market

Based on what?  The Canucks will have PLENTY of capspace.

 

Friedman seems to be onto this "trade Gudbranson" bandwagon, same as Botchford and other sourceless blowhards.  In the past at least he could substantiate his claims, now he's got absolutely nothing but speculation -- and irrational at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said:

Based on what?  The Canucks will have PLENTY of capspace.

 

Friedman seems to be onto this "trade Gudbranson" bandwagon, same as Botchford and other sourceless blowhards.  In the past at least he could substantiate his claims, now he's got absolutely nothing but speculation -- and irrational at that.

Friedman has been rapidly declining.

Could be osmosis, but who knows?

He seems as concerned with his hair as he is with substance.  Or perhaps he's realizing that providing substance doesn't necessarily get you ahead in his business.

 

With Dreger having grown so insignificant, there are some Leafs-lobby shoes to fill....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said:

Based on what?  The Canucks will have PLENTY of capspace.

 

Friedman seems to be onto this "trade Gudbranson" bandwagon, same as Botchford and other sourceless blowhards.  In the past at least he could substantiate his claims, now he's got absolutely nothing but speculation -- and irrational at that.

It isn’t that they can’t fit him under the cap, it is they won’t want to pay UFA market price for him at our stage of team development.

He will probably be able to get $5+ million from “someone” and a 4-5 year term.

He hasn’t been a fit at all here, and we wouldn’t be coughing up that kind of coin for what he brings to us.

He will almost certainly get traded, and will re-sign with that team or maybe go back to Florida where he had success and is apparently wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Provost said:

It isn’t that they can’t fit him under the cap, it is they won’t want to pay UFA market price for him at our stage of team development.

He will probably be able to get $5+ million from “someone” and a 4-5 year term.

He hasn’t been a fit at all here, and we wouldn’t be coughing up that kind of coin for what he brings to us.

He will almost certainly get traded, and will re-sign with that team or maybe go back to Florida where he had success and is apparently wanted.

Repeated failed attempts to speak for Benning.

 

You don't know:

1) what "they" / Benning will or won't want

2) what Benning thinks regarding Gudbranson's fit here,

nor

3) that he will almost certainly get traded, as if he isn't wanted here.... (but he's 'apparently wanted' in Florida, or will be by 'someone'...).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Provost said:

It isn’t that they can’t fit him under the cap, it is they won’t want to pay UFA market price for him at our stage of team development.

He will probably be able to get $5+ million from “someone” and a 4-5 year term.

He hasn’t been a fit at all here, and we wouldn’t be coughing up that kind of coin for what he brings to us.

He will almost certainly get traded, and will re-sign with that team or maybe go back to Florida where he had success and is apparently wanted.

I disagree that he hasn't fit in here. I would live for him to get an extended opportunity here. The problem is he keeps getting injured .  I'm rooting for him to resign here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Provost said:

It isn’t that they can’t fit him under the cap, it is they won’t want to pay UFA market price for him at our stage of team development.

I ask the same question of Friedman -- why not?  Benning knew what he was getting, and clearly WANTS this type of player.

 

And what about a 25-year-old dman just coming into his prime is "not at our stage of team development"?  Is this Logan's Run, where we turf any player over 23?  According to our projected plan he will be fully into his prime, not just as a player but in leadership, when this team is ready to compete.

 

52 minutes ago, Provost said:

He hasn’t been a fit at all here

Based on what -- not being in the lineup for most of the time he's been here?  Where's the factual evidence for that assertion?  And sorry, fancy stats can't quantify it either.  How about simply looking at what happens to our players when he's not in our lineup versus when he is?

 

53 minutes ago, Provost said:

He will almost certainly get traded

And once again -- based on WHAT?  Spurious bigoted musings from Botchford are not valid.  There has been zero evidence that the Canucks do not want to re-sign him; indeed any indications are that they want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said:

I mean its not like juolevi plays huge.... I'd fore sure take lil on our team don't need Every D to be a beast we got biega for that ;)

Not for Guddy though.  Plus, Juiolevvi is already over 200 pounds.  Unless Lil is Eric Karlsson, he’s going to get killed.  I think that’s likely why he fell so much in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, oldnews said:

Repeated failed attempts to speak for Benning.

 

You don't know:

1) what "they" / Benning will or won't want

2) what Benning thinks regarding Gudbranson's fit here,

nor

3) that he will almost certainly get traded, as if he isn't wanted here.... (but he's 'apparently wanted' in Florida, or will be by 'someone'...).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am fine listening to multiple reporters and sources who have direct access to the team, staff, and management rather than you.

 

Reports say he was almost traded back to Florida last summer, you generally don’t do that with a player you intend to pay top UFA dollar for.

 

Multiple reporters have indicated that the team is looking at trading Gudbranson sooner rather than later.

 

I didn’t profess to know the future with absolute like you often do, but used past facts like what similar UFA D sign for in order to extrapolate into what I believed likely to happen in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Provost said:

I am fine listening to multiple reporters and sources who have direct access to the team, staff, and management rather than you.

 

Reports say he was almost traded back to Florida last summer, you generally don’t do that with a player you intend to pay top UFA dollar for.

 

Multiple reporters have indicated that the team is looking at trading Gudbranson sooner rather than later.

 

I didn’t process to know the future with absolute like you often do, but used past facts like what similar UFA D sign for in order to extrapolate into what I believed likely to happen in the future.

It's a cool story but your sources are absent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldnews said:

So, to be clear, you'd trade Gudbranson for Brendan Smith or Jeff Petry?   

 

And here's the additional irony:

 

Jeff Petry has a 6yr x 5.5 million contract.

Brendan Smith 4 years x 4.35

 

Those are the types of terms people are cringing about, as if Gudbranson aint worth it.

Failed to grasp at the point, but whatever.

 

You rarely see a pending UFAs fetch a first round pick, let alone a good prospect, unless it's a top end player like a Tavares.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shiznak said:

Failed to grasp at the point, but whatever.

 

You rarely see a pending UFAs fetch a first round pick, let alone a good prospect, unless it's a top end player like a Tavares.

 

Which is another reason why JB must sign this guy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...