logic Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 1 minute ago, kingofsurrey said: Weird how first round draft choices are described as having potential.... weird heh ? Lol 6 years ago he definitely had potential.. Should we trade Schaller for Henrik Samuelsson or Stefan Matteau because they have potential? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, logic said: Schaller is 4 years older than Gaunce not like Gaunce is 20 and Schaller is 32 And already proven to be a solid bottom 6 NHL forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where'd Luongo? Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, canuck73_3 said: When drafted yes. 6 years later not so much. When in each year he has been better than the last, he is 24 and the average peak is 28, yes. Edited August 27, 2018 by Where'd Luongo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logic Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Just now, Where'd Luongo? said: When in each year he has been better than the last, yes. 12 points in 114 games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goal:thecup Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Hint to canuck73_3 et al who are arguing with these trolls: Put them on "Ignore". They are cluttering up every thread. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Where'd Luongo? said: When in each year he has been better than the last, yes. 1pt, 5pts, 6pts. You're right if we lose him now were screwed. How on earth will we replace his 6 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelar Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 10 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: We have $10mil in capspace and people still whine about a 1.9mil 2 year deal. Unreal. No $&!#. And they want to give the spot to Gaunce no less. Funny how OJ is a bust already according to some but Gaunce in his draft +7 year is still growing. My guess is we all know what Gaunce is at this point. Not much good happens and not much bad happens when he is on the ice. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Where'd Luongo? said: When in each year he has been better than the last, he is 24 and the average peak is 28, yes. So rather than signing depth guys, you'd rather hope that Gaunce turns into Karlsson 2.0 sometime in the next 4 years? Edited August 27, 2018 by HerrDrFunk 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Just now, Goal:thecup said: Hint to canuck73_3 et al who are arguing with these trolls: Put them on "Ignore". They are cluttering up every thread. You are not supposed to call other posters here " trolls " If you don't want to discuss the player on this thread.... go to another thread... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where'd Luongo? Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, logic said: 12 points in 114 games 6 points in 37 games, then injured. Also a 0 +/- on a terrible team. Edited August 27, 2018 by Where'd Luongo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Just now, Stelar said: No $&!#. And they want to give the spot to Gaunce no less. Funny how OJ is a bust already according to some but Gaunce in his draft +7 year is still growing. My guess is we all know what Gaunce is at this point. Not much good happens and not much bad happens when he is on the ice. I genuinely like Gaunce a lot good kid but at this point very replaceable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelar Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 1 minute ago, canuck73_3 said: I genuinely like Gaunce a lot good kid but at this point very replaceable. I neither like him or dislike him. He is very replaceable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where'd Luongo? Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, Stelar said: No $&!#. And they want to give the spot to Gaunce no less. Funny how OJ is a bust already according to some but Gaunce in his draft +7 year is still growing. My guess is we all know what Gaunce is at this point. Not much good happens and not much bad happens when he is on the ice. How is OJ a bust? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, Goal:thecup said: Hint to canuck73_3 et al who are arguing with these trolls: Put them on "Ignore". They are cluttering up every thread. Care to talk about Schaller? At this point you're adding even less than the “trolls” to the discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 1 minute ago, canuck73_3 said: Care to talk about Schaller? At this point you're adding even less than the “trolls” to the discussion. I have added much more than you. That much is certain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where'd Luongo? Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 (edited) Another talking point on Schaller vs Gaunce: Schaller Gaunce OZS% 36% 15% GA/60 2.05 1.74 Edited August 27, 2018 by Where'd Luongo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Just now, Where'd Luongo? said: Another talking point on Schaller vs Gaunce: Schaller had 36% zone starts in the offensive zone compared to Gaunce's 15%. Because Schaller is a better offensive player. If Gaunce could contribute more he'd get more offensive starts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Just now, Where'd Luongo? said: Another talking point on Schaller vs Gaunce: Schaller had 36% zone starts in the offensive zone compared to Gaunce's 15%. Schaller is an undrafted borderline . NHL . / AHL player . that has been negative plus minus pretty much every year.... and he disappeared in this years playoffs. The Bruins did not want to bring him back......... so the Canucks signed him to 2 year deal as a place holder 4th line centre. Personally, i think Gaunce is younger and faster and better defensively..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 1 minute ago, kingofsurrey said: Schaller is an undrafted borderline . NHL . / AHL player . that has been negative plus minus pretty much every year.... and he disappeared in this years playoffs. The Bruins did not want to bring him back......... so the Canucks signed him to 2 year deal as a place holder 4th line centre. Personally, i think Gaunce is younger and faster and better defensively..... You think he's younger because he is younger. Defensively they're a wash. Offensively Schaller destroys Gaunce. Physically Schaller destroys Gaunce. And as for skating you're right Schaller is awful 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where'd Luongo? Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: Because Schaller is a better offensive player. If Gaunce could contribute more he'd get more offensive starts... Gaunce's FA% 41.65 compared to Schaller's FA% 38.4, meaning Gaunce actually generates more scoring chances and/or stops more opposing teams scoring chances (not including blocked shots) than Schaller, which is concerning considering that Schaller had 21% more ozone starts. Edited August 27, 2018 by Where'd Luongo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now