Canucks6 Posted June 14, 2019 Share Posted June 14, 2019 Would the trade work or is there ntc in play here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SN- Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 Note: Tags are mandatory only in the Trades, Rumours, Signings forum and in the Proposals and Armchair GM'ing forum. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Alflives Posted June 15, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted June 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, StealthNuck said: Note: Tags are mandatory only in the Trades, Rumours, Signings forum and in the Proposals and Armchair GM'ing forum. I know this is off topic, but you guys do a good job moderating our board. Thank you. Wanted that to be public. I didn’t know Shattenkirk still played. Not that Loui does either, so I guess it’s fair. 1 2 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 At least LE can contribute on the PK in a defensive role. There really isn't anywhere to hide a defensive liability like Shattenkirk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 7 minutes ago, King Heffy said: At least LE can contribute on the PK in a defensive role. There really isn't anywhere to hide a defensive liability like Shattenkirk. If Shattenkirk ever committed to fitness and being in peak shape, he might be a player. Guy does have skill. He’s just always seemed a bit pudgy. Kind of like the guy we just didn’t sign. I already forgot his name. Did it start with a P? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 55 minutes ago, Alflives said: If Shattenkirk ever committed to fitness and being in peak shape, he might be a player. Guy does have skill. He’s just always seemed a bit pudgy. Kind of like the guy we just didn’t sign. I already forgot his name. Did it start with a P? Pudgiot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 To be honest, Shattenkirk, Neal, Lucic, Marleau, whoever.... getting something would be better than Eriksson sticking around. That's kind of where I'm at in thinking. I hope it's not Lucic, but that's besides my point. lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabcakes Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 There is so much talk about Loui but any move would be a miracle frankly. Look at it this way, why on earth would somebody trade for him? The only reason that I can see is that a team may be shifting an even worse player. Lucic? Puhleeze. Sweeten the deal with Puljujarvi and the Oilers have lost the deal big time. It isn't happening. A 2nd? Maybe. I think that either party swallows their medicine. No deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 all this attention on loui and desire to move him on as if he were somehow a difference maker, a negative one, on the team he is a meh player.. just overpaid will make little difference to the team either way whether he stay or goes his contract has no relevance till the last year when he can simply be bought out seems like people are frustrated with the team and simply venting this all on loui more energy really needs to be focused on the recent years of little attention being given to improving the d grouping our better d are too often injured the rest are just so uninspiring in terms of what they bring the team is presently not equipped to manage a transition from tanev/edler to the new incoming young talent huges, joulevi, woo, etc the team waited too long to draft d... while knowing they take longer to develop the team needs mid age top flight healthy veteran help when that is accomplished feel free to whine more about loui 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rocket Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 Like the idea behind this one. Shattenkirk would be an upgrade and has one less year so Canucks would have to add a sweetener. Goldobin enough? Or something better required? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skolozsy2 Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 5 hours ago, Alflives said: If Shattenkirk ever committed to fitness and being in peak shape, he might be a player. Guy does have skill. He’s just always seemed a bit pudgy. Kind of like the guy we just didn’t sign. I already forgot his name. Did it start with a P? Not sure it's the guy you're thinking of, but Kyle Wellwood always seemed like a player on your team with above average skill that could have benefited from some better off-season training and diet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 6 minutes ago, skolozsy2 said: Not sure it's the guy you're thinking of, but Kyle Wellwood always seemed like a player on your team with above average skill that could have benefited from some better off-season training and diet. Pouliot. --- Shattenkirk took a paycut to sign with NYR. Tampa apparently offered him more but he wanted to be in that region. He has a 10-team no trade list and with teams close to the cap who don't need to be on that list - he's probably unlikely to be heading back west. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 I am pretty sure Shattenkirk still has a ton of value considering he's still a Top 4 dman. I can't say the same about Ericksson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rocket Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 With the Rags Aquiring Trouba, shattenkirk could defs be on the outs. Maybe can’t do an Eriksson swap but I’m sure he could be had for cheap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, The_Rocket said: With the Rags Aquiring Trouba, shattenkirk could defs be on the outs. Maybe can’t do an Eriksson swap but I’m sure he could be had for cheap The Trouba deal does make this interesting now. Say we retain 1 mill(ish) on Loui the blob? Just treat Shatt as a 2 yr, 7 mill bridge to our rhD, like Woo & Tree Wasn't intending to rhyme, but venture most would agree... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rocket Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 41 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said: The Trouba deal does make this interesting now. Say we retain 1 mill(ish) on Loui the blob? Just treat Shatt as a 2 yr, 7 mill bridge to our rhD, like Woo & Tree Wasn't intending to rhyme, but venture most would agree... Yeah that’s exactly the way I see it. NYR saves a million per year to put towards Trouba and as bad as he is I’m sure Eriksson can crack their bottom 6. Maybe Canucks add a sweetener too, like a Goldobin or something? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 I don't think NYR have any immediate concerns with the cap.. They would like rather wait out the 2 years of Shattenkirk rather than acquire 1 more year of Erickson. They could toss 8million to Trouba and still have 10m left over to sign their 4-5 RFAs // UFAs in which they aren't going to cost much... Other than maybe Buchnevich but he'd prob be 4-5m or could be tossed a bridge deal to branch the Shattenkirk deal. Now if they really wanted Panarin then I agree Shattenkirk likely has to go but they would indefinitely not be taking a LE contract back if that was the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now