Bertuzzipunch Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 10 minutes ago, Nucksownyou said: Then you clearly have no clue about what you are talking about. Yeah please provide a proof that he was a lil good lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 2 hours ago, BlastPast said: Perhaps you also have biases and blind spots. That's not to say they aren't present in NHL decision making, but just because something doesn't make sense to you doesn't mean there isn't any sense there to be made. At any rate, I would guess it is unlikely OEL ends up here. I would also guess that right side defense is more of a priority at this point; unfortunately, it's a difficult position to build. You were very kind to add the “perhaps.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westcoastcanucks777 Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 He musta promised everyone he will win some cups for them he just needs the P Kane and J Toews $ in advance ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podz92 Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 hour ago, captainhorvat said: Someone needs to take Jimbos phone away... I hope Jimbo isn’t putting as much time into the OEL thing again as CDC is...but unfortunately I suspect we aren’t even making a dent on the amount of time he is tying up with it 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 5 minutes ago, JamesBlondage said: I hope Jimbo isn’t putting as much time into the OEL thing again as CDC is...but unfortunately I suspect we aren’t even making a dent on the amount of time he is tying up with it Could you imagine “Canucks forget to send paperwork on upcoming RFA’s so they’re set to become UFA’s because he’s been overworking on a potential OEL deal and can’t multitask” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whysoserious Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Can we stop targeting players based on past pedigree. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 37 minutes ago, whysoserious said: Can we stop targeting players based on past pedigree. it's Benning... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlastPast Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 hour ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said: You were very kind to add the “perhaps.” Hey, you just might be that one person in the history of human civilization that doesn't ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 4 hours ago, JohnTavares said: Reported offers were 1st, 2nd, Virtanen, Sutter for OEL. It may not have been exactly like this but I think the core components of 1st + Sutter + Virtanen were in there. Who reported this exactly? Feel free to post links/tweets. My guess is if anyone did in fact claim this, it was likely someone like Sekeres postulating from his posterior as usual. Please don't spam the board with unsubstantiated nonsense. It's half the problem with this market. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 18 minutes ago, aGENT said: Who reported this exactly? Feel free to post links/tweets. My guess is if anyone did in fact claim this, it was likely someone like Sekeres postulating from his posterior as usual. Please don't spam the board with unsubstantiated nonsense. It's half the problem with this market. From Coyotes beat reporter Craig Morgan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Bertuzzipunch said: From Coyotes beat reporter Craig Morgan Probably more intel on what ARZ was asking, not what we were offering. I'd note that there's a reason the deal didn't happen. I don't believe for a second we were offering our 1st. Edited June 22, 2021 by aGENT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Just now, aGENT said: Probably more intel on what ARZ was asking, not what we were offering. I'd note that there's a reason the deal didn't happen. I don't believe for a second we were offering our 1st. If so it was surely protected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 5 hours ago, JohnTavares said: Reported offers were 1st, 2nd, Virtanen, Sutter for OEL. It may not have been exactly like this but I think the core components of 1st + Sutter + Virtanen were in there. Reported by who? Fans on Twitter? No way that Benning would have offered a 1st and a 2nd for a player that was only willing to go to two teams. The fact that the trade never went through proves that’s BS. Arizona would have gladly accepted that trade. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 19 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Reported by who? Fans on Twitter? No way that Benning would have offered a 1st and a 2nd for a player that was only willing to go to two teams. The fact that the trade never went through proves that’s BS. Arizona would have gladly accepted that trade. Yeah the owners of the yotes woulda made sure they took that offer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westcoastcanucks777 Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 2 hours ago, Canuckster86 said: it's Benning... It’s you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted June 22, 2021 Author Share Posted June 22, 2021 6 hours ago, shayster007 said: This was wildly known? I paid pretty close attention to this trade last year and don't recall our first being in play. I recall the deal being 2nd and Virtanen being reported, and the Yotes asking for a 1st. The trade didn't happen, so I'm gonna assume the first was a no fly. Friedman said that Armstrong was looking at the RoR trade as template which included a 1st. Sat Shah had the 1st going the other way. It was on the prospects that the deal fell apart. Arizona wanted Demko, Höglander or Podkolzin and that was a no go. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanleysteamersmyl Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Another 30+ anchor to replace Lou's anchor. Don't do it Jim!!!!!!!!! We need two tough, big, stay at home D men. Trying to sign OEL last time resulted in -running out of time to sign Toffoli. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 hour ago, mll said: Friedman said that Armstrong was looking at the RoR trade as template which included a 1st. Sat Shah had the 1st going the other way. It was on the prospects that the deal fell apart. Arizona wanted Demko, Höglander or Podkolzin and that was a no go. I have a hard time believing that. We got Schmidt who is 90% as good as OEL for a 3rd round pick. Have a hard time believing the other rumours as having anything to do with our offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 4 hours ago, flickyoursedin said: Could you imagine “Canucks forget to send paperwork on upcoming RFA’s so they’re set to become UFA’s because he’s been overworking on a potential OEL deal and can’t multitask” You guys have gone full... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 hour ago, mll said: Friedman said that Armstrong was looking at the RoR trade as template which included a 1st. Sat Shah had the 1st going the other way. It was on the prospects that the deal fell apart. Arizona wanted Demko, Höglander or Podkolzin and that was a no go. I have a really hard time believing that the Yotes were asking for essentially 2 first round picks and a 2nd. He has a huge contract, they had a 2 team list, and they felt pressure to shed the money due to the teams financial woes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts