nameci Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 To Chicago: 11OA Silovs TWO of Myers, Garland, or Boeser To Vancouver: 19 OA 2023 second round pick Conor Murphy We sell high on Silovs, get back a second round pick, get a serviceable RHD (yes, I know he is older), retain a pick in the first round, and gain cap space. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nameci Posted May 29, 2023 Author Share Posted May 29, 2023 Two screw ups on one line. Sorry I forgot the tag and it should read Selling High, Clearing Cap space. My apologies to all. That’s what happens when you do something in a hurry. Mea culpa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 I don't think Chicago bites. In the past, taking on two contracts like that would cost 2 1st round picks. Take out the 19th overall and Chicago listens. This is the seriousness of the predicament the Canucks are in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 I knew that there would be a "Hey, let's trade Silovs...." thread today lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said: I knew that there would be a "Hey, let's trade Silovs...." thread today lol Stop listening to your Chipmunk classics and Get ‘er done Allvin. Edited May 29, 2023 by Alflives 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 We have somebody really good developing! Quick, get rid of him! 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbit Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 The proposal is not good for Canucks. Passed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 Let’s just trade Demko and Silovs. We can run with no NHL goalie 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabcakes Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 Silov's has only 5 NHL games and a 0.908 s%. That's a tiny sample size and carries almost no weight. Silovs just doesn't have any market value yet. This amounts to a give away. Pass. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 10 minutes ago, Crabcakes said: Silov's has only 5 NHL games and a 0.908 s%. That's a tiny sample size and carries almost no weight. Silovs just doesn't have any market value yet. This amounts to a give away. Pass. Which is why we’re trading Demko. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabcakes Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 20 minutes ago, Alflives said: Which is why we’re trading Demko. Another stupid discussion that I heard on 650 today. Honestly, why do they waste oxygen discussing what will never happen. I just shut them off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 1 minute ago, Crabcakes said: Another stupid discussion that I heard on 650 today. Honestly, why do they waste oxygen discussing what will never happen. I just shut them off. Because it’s fun! Now relax. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.Am.Ironman Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 Why is everyone in a rush to trade our 1st round pick? We are supposed to keep those. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curmudgeon Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 29 minutes ago, Crabcakes said: Another stupid discussion that I heard on 650 today. Honestly, why do they waste oxygen discussing what will never happen. I just shut them off. a) because they have dead air to fill b) because they have giant egos c) because they think themselves experts d) because there has to be something in between the advertisements e) all of the above 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 25 minutes ago, I.Am.Ironman said: Why is everyone in a rush to trade our 1st round pick? We are supposed to keep those. No worries. Benning is no longer our GM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, Wilbur said: I don't think Chicago bites. In the past, taking on two contracts like that would cost 2 1st round picks. Take out the 19th overall and Chicago listens. This is the seriousness of the predicament the Canucks are in. Garland will be bringing back assets, not the other way around. Edit: take out the 19th overall? Are you nuts? This proposed deal is horribly uneven. We can get a pick back for Myers this season and it will become a better pick the closer we get to the trade deadline. Edited May 30, 2023 by VancouverHabitant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 Just now, VancouverHabitant said: Garland will be bringing back assets, not the other way around. Hope you're right. Wingers don't have a ton of trade value and GMs know the Canucks really want to create more space. I don't see anyone doing the Canucks a favour, when you could possibly sign a winger for cheap and pay no assets in free agency. I heard an idea on the radio that perhaps you could swap Garland for another teams iffy contract, but a defensemen. Maybe something like that could be found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 Is it selling high or is it selling low? 2nd isn’t enough for me to give up on his potential. 2nd round picks only have a 30% chance of turning out even less for a difference maker. Our recent history I’d rather keep the player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 No chance, I firstly wouldn't want to trade the 1st rounder let alone Demko let alone both and certainly not for cap dumps. Maybe...11OA + Demko to CBJ for the 3rd overall and draft Carlsson, but even then our team is a lot worse in the future, I'd rather taken Reinbacher + Demko + Silovs over Carlsson + Silovs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now