Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

hockeyville88

[Report] Canucks working on new deal for Burrows

256 posts in this topic

4yrs/16m

if i know burrows the way i think i do, it shouldnt be hard to come to terms

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope he still takes a paycut

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He deserves to be 'paid'......like a boss.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like burrows but can't help but think the Sedins boosted his play. He should get the salary of a 'good' second liner IMO.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By order of GVT last season:

Schneider

Burrows

H. Sedin

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like burrows but can't help but think the Sedins boosted his play. He should get the salary of a 'good' second liner IMO.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Multi-year deal at $4.1 million sounds good for me.

I just hope Burrows' agent doesn't gouge the Canucks saying "you better give my client market value after playing the past four years well below it".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly as much as I love him, I think it's a good time for him to bank what he's really worth. I can't believe he signed for so low, but it kind of feels like we took advantage of him. If another team can offer him better then all the power to him.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't seem us offering more than Kesler money as the top end. Clearly, he is worth more than 2M, which is way beyond a discount IMO. There would probably be a team on the open market willing to offer 6M would be my guess.

With all that in mind, I think he will sign with us in the range 4.0-4.5M for 3-4 years, which is pretty fair.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Multi-year deal at $4.1 million sounds good for me.

I just hope Burrows' agent doesn't gouge the Canucks saying "you better give my client market value after playing the past four years well below it".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Bieksa can be given a 5 year contract at 30 years old, I see no problem with giving Burrows a 5 year contract at 31 years old.

21M over 5 years @ 4.2M/yr although for burr I'd go as high as 5M a year.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.