tera_ha Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Sharks got fleeced. Martin Jones got a similar value as Cory Scheneiders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombastik der Teutone Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 totally missed that the kings dealt jones to the bruins ..well i m on vacations so berube no. 2 in los angeles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tera_ha Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Wow, are all those goalies that much better than Lack? Or are we all simply massively overrating Lack on CDC? I don't think they are a lot better. Sharks just massively overpaid IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Jones: A) Is younger Has higher potential C) Is not UFA at year's end Lack being a Ufa changes all his value compared to players like Jonea or Lehner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiffyPB Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 lmfao we got a paltry 3rd for the most proven goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Martin Jones was also undrafted, btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pdrizzle Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Lack is a back up goalie. He was never worth a 1st or a 2nd with all the goalies available. And team had no reason to go after him because Canucks were stuck in a corner cuz we had to get rid of lack or mackstrom Or we would lose 1 of them on waivers for nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Soldier Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Lack is a back up goalie. He was never worth a 1st or a 2nd with all the goalies available. And team had no reason to go after him because Canucks were stuck in a corner cuz we had to get rid of lack or mackstrom Or we would lose 1 of them on waivers for nothing. This. Also, eighty games is proven? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedman Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 That 1st rounder is going to be a pretty high one. The Sharks aren't making the playoffs. Can't believe that Jones got a return like that. This trade is worse than the Lehner trade. I would be furious if i were a Sharks-fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Give your head a shake ... it proves there was NO MARKET for Lack. Not the other way around. If anyone would have made a better offer GMJB would have taken it. Especially when its obvious the club was intent on moving him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Lack is a back up goalie. He was never worth a 1st or a 2nd with all the goalies available. And team had no reason to go after him because Canucks were stuck in a corner cuz we had to get rid of lack or mackstrom Or we would lose 1 of them on waivers for nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Martin Jones and Robin Lehner respectively are 25 and 23 years old. Both touted to be better goalies and plenty of room left to grow. Lehner already has a cheap 2 year deal and Martin Jones is an RFA. They have several years before either one hits UFA market. In comparison Talbot and Lack but have 1 year deals left before they hit UFA for big bucks. Teams are less inclined due for that reason, and also because both are 27 years old. They have pretty much hit their max potential and they are what they are. So that pushes down their value alonside their 1 year deals looking for big money. They may be better goalies now...but in a few years time Jones and Lehner can easily be better than both guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jejejester Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 I would have to agree that the sharks got fleeced. To much to give up for an unproven backup with starter potential Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucksfor2012 Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Wow, are all those goalies that much better than Lack? Or are we all simply massively overrating Lack on CDC? To be fair the return on Talbot wasn't that much better than Lack. A late second, late third, and a seventh vs. an early third and a seventh. Late second about the same as an early third, so Talbot got a late third more than Lack basically, & Talbot was more in demand. SJS and BUF bought Jones and Lehner based on potential, and also overpaid IMO (unless the max out their suggested potential). but just because they overpaid for those two does not mean they would overpay for Lack. They were obviously high on those guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 So Boston got a 1st from the Lucic trade, along with Jones. Now they got another 1st for trading Jones away. Along with the 1st and the 2 2nd's they got from Hamilton. That's 3 1st's and 2 2nd's. THIS is rebuilding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Lack is a back up goalie. He was never worth a 1st or a 2nd with all the goalies available. And team had no reason to go after him because Canucks were stuck in a corner cuz we had to get rid of lack or mackstrom Or we would lose 1 of them on waivers for nothing.Martin Jones is a starter how? I found it interesting that SJ still had to pay a 1st after practically all the other goaltenders already found homes. Is Jones that much better? Nope. But maybe SJ plans on making some more moves to win now. imho They kinda have to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 SJS got trade raped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William_Clarkson Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 This may be hard for Canucks fans to hear since they have such a hard on for the guy, but Jones has more value, as did Talbot & Lehner than Lack. Nothing against Lack, but he's not as great as so many Canucks fans think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucksfor2012 Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Lehner, Talbot, Jones all worth 1st round picks. Eddie Lack....well not so much, because reason. Canucks don't seem to understand 'market value'. Too busy trying to figure out why they can't get more for 34 year old soon to be UFA defenseman with an NTC. Hilarious. Talbot didn't get a first round pick. He got the equivalent of a late third/early fourth more than Lack did. But hey, yeah! GMJB out GM'd again, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANUCK-EXPRESS Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 If Lehner and Jones got traded for first rounders.. Why couldn't we just trade Markstrom instead of Lack? He's younger and still has potential. I know Lack is UFA but I think he loved Vancouver too much to leave. Sigh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.