Edlerberry Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 if stamkos continues on his trajectory he'll be a third liner in 2 years Yeah.. 09-13 - 340pts in 294 games = 1.16 P/G average original production 13/14 - 1.08 P/G = 93.1% of former self remaining, 6.9% of original production lost 14/15 - 0.88 P/G = 75.8% of former self remaining 18.5% Y2Y, 2.5x faster degradation Y2Y 1.08 - 0.88 = 0.20P/G 0.20 P/G x 2.5 = 0.45P/G loss next year 15/16 - 0.43 P/G = 37% of former self remaining 0.45 x 2.5 = 1.13 P/G loss next year 16/17 - -0.70 P/G = -60% of former self remains, Stamkos ceases to exist, becoming less than nothing while still a liability to his club Its worse than I thought. In two years Stamkos will cost his team 0.7 points per game, putting up a total of negative 57 points in 82 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-PatLostInEdm Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 He went to the one franchise that actually has the ability to derail a star's career. Who are, unfortunately, no longer guided by the comedic stylings of Kevin D'oh. They are going to be a problem very soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 09-13 - 340pts in 294 games = 1.16 P/G average original production 13/14 - 1.08 P/G = 93.1% of former self remaining, 6.9% of original production lost 14/15 - 0.88 P/G = 75.8% of former self remaining 18.5% Y2Y, 2.5x faster degradation Y2Y 1.08 - 0.88 = 0.20P/G 0.20 P/G x 2.5 = 0.45P/G loss next year 15/16 - 0.43 P/G = 37% of former self remaining 0.45 x 2.5 = 1.13 P/G loss next year 16/17 - -0.70 P/G = -60% of former self remains, Stamkos ceases to exist, becoming less than nothing while still a liability to his club Its worse than I thought. In two years Stamkos will cost his team 0.7 points per game, putting up a total of negative 57 points in 82 games.Stamkos is 25 years old, not 35. You must think unicorns and fairies are real too, if you believe he will continue to trend downwards, at his age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 lots of praise from one of the top goal scorers the past 5 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 09-13 - 340pts in 294 games = 1.16 P/G average original production 13/14 - 1.08 P/G = 93.1% of former self remaining, 6.9% of original production lost 14/15 - 0.88 P/G = 75.8% of former self remaining 18.5% Y2Y, 2.5x faster degradation Y2Y 1.08 - 0.88 = 0.20P/G 0.20 P/G x 2.5 = 0.45P/G loss next year 15/16 - 0.43 P/G = 37% of former self remaining 0.45 x 2.5 = 1.13 P/G loss next year 16/17 - -0.70 P/G = -60% of former self remains, Stamkos ceases to exist, becoming less than nothing while still a liability to his club Its worse than I thought. In two years Stamkos will cost his team 0.7 points per game, putting up a total of negative 57 points in 82 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancaster Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Alexander Daigle.... just saying.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Props to Stamkos for basically showing he has little to no ego for a 60 goal scorer former 1st overall pick himself. Props? Stamkos has just seen the entire internet say 'no way, you're the best'. I saw this as a 100% ego boost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standing_Tall#37 Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 I'll take stamkos's words over yours. McDynasty is the real deal. Exactly, when Gretzky says he's the best player to enter the league since Lemieux as well as head and shoulders above Crosby.... That's when you should realize the kid is the real deal, but now to have Stamkos say this only validates that. Scary that we're gonna have this guy in our division for the next 15-20 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Exactly, when Gretzky says he's the best player to enter the league since Lemieux as well as head and shoulders above Crosby.... That's when you should realize the kid is the real deal, but now to have Stamkos say this only validates that. Scary that we're gonna have this guy in our division for the next 15-20 years. Gretzky also said the best goalie of all-time was Grant Fuhr. So you know, don't hang on his every word. Plus, McDavid could leave Edmonton any time - by trade, or through UFA in c.2023. Don't get your heart set on seeing him torment Frankie Corrado for 1,000 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standing_Tall#37 Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Gretzky also said the best goalie of all-time was Grant Fuhr. So you know, don't hang on his every word. Plus, McDavid could leave Edmonton any time - by trade, or through UFA in c.2023. Don't get your heart set on seeing him torment Frankie Corrado for 1,000 games. My heart wasnt set on that as I don't currently see any D-man on our roster beyond maybe Hamhuis & Tanev having a 1000 game career. As for Fuhr, in the late 80s many felt that way. He also has 4+ cups and flags fly forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Exactly, when Gretzky says he's the best player to enter the league since Lemieux as well as head and shoulders above Crosby.... That's when you should realize the kid is the real deal, but now to have Stamkos say this only validates that. Scary that we're gonna have this guy in our division for the next 15-20 years. Did he say that before or after Edmonton won the lottery? Just out of curiosity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amish Rake Fighter Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Alexander Daigle.... just saying.... Connor McDaigle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xbox Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Alexander Daigle.... just saying.... Still a better 1st overall pic than Patrik Stefan lel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Its worse than I thought. In two years Stamkos will cost his team 0.7 points per game, putting up a total of negative 57 points in 82 games. Stamkos is 25 years old, not 35. You must think unicorns and fairies are real too, if you believe he will continue to trend downwards, at his age. When Stamkos is swallowed up by a rift in space-time sometime during the 16-17 season due to his points regression, fairies will be the least of our concerns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Did he say that before or after Edmonton won the lottery? Just out of curiosity. when mcdavid was 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Industrious1 Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 If McDavid can replicate or get close to Crosby's first season point totals, I will be more inclined to believe that he is the 'real deal'. Until then all we have is rampant speculation. Honestly, I think if he gets 50 points or a bit over it will be a successful rookie season for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falcon45ca Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Wow, that's a looooooong fall off a pedestal that high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
proheffanol Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 One of the many reasons Stamkos is my favourite player in the league is because he doesn't have an ego like Evander Kane or Kesler, so it doesn't surprise me too much that Stammer would say something like that. I don't think McDavid is better than Stamkos now, but at some point in the next 2 or 3 years people will classify McDavid is better than Stamkos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 mcDEEZ is gonna be point per game with hall hitting 90 if he's healthy and they play together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 One of the many reasons Stamkos is my favourite player in the league is because he doesn't have an ego like Evander Kane or Kesler, so it doesn't surprise me too much that Stammer would say something like that. I don't think McDavid is better than Stamkos now, but at some point in the next 2 or 3 years people will classify McDavid is better than Stamkos.Every NHL fanbase is now saying 'what a classy guy, no ego, we'd love him here, but he's dead wrong, he's one of the league's best players'. In a contract year. Why are people not seeing this for what it is? A cold, calculated comment designed to give him additional leverage. I lost a lot of respect for Stamkos with this comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.