Frazzy Desjardins Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Miller isn't as lights out as he was early on, but a C-... Really? He should be at least a B imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Great. A bunch of meaningless stats based on media opinions. Thanks TSN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knucklehd Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 TSN trolls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShakyWalton Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Miller is more than a C-...but is McCann a B?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I propose we make a thread grading the TSN analysts.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 7 hours ago, Master Mind said: Having 4 defencemen rated a B, and Miller a C would have you believe Miller's been letting the team down. But in reality, the defence has been the biggest problem. Yup. In other words, whoever made this googled "canucks stats plz derp derp I haven't watched a game all year derp derp but I have to write an article" Here are my grades, I've gone relative to pay and overall performance Henrik: A+ Daniel: A+ Hansen: A+ Burrows: C+ Horvat: C- Vrbata: C Sutter: B+ Higgins: B+ I think he's been great after injury. Virtanen: C- imo he's not ready Cracknell: A Prust: A Dorsett: B- McCann: B- Sven: C+ He's been good defensively. Gets too mmuch hate. Edler: B+ Tanev: B Hamhuis: B- Weber: C+ Bart: B Hutton: B- Sbisa: A- <3 Miller A Marky B- Sorry for the double spacing, my phone doesn't have a shift button. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Way too many passing grades for a team currently on pace for 30 wins, 82 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead44 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I'd drop Edler down to a C+, Bartkowski to a C, McCann to a B-, Vrbata to a C-. I'd bump Miller up to a C, Hansen to a B+, Burrows to a C+, Cracknell to a C+, Baertschi and Horvat to a C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabcakes Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 8 hours ago, BurrsArrows said: CANUCKS' GRADES BY PLAYER Goalies Grade Age AAV W L OT Sv% Ryan Miller C- 35 $6.0 m 6 7 5 0.911 Jacob Markstrom Inc. 25 $1.6 m 1 1 1 0.903 Defencemen Grade Age AAV GP G P +/- Alex Edler B 29 $5.0 m 21 4 12 4 Ben Hutton B- 22 $896 k 20 0 8 -6 Matt Bartkowski B- 27 $1.8 m 21 2 7 1 Chris Tanev B- 25 $4.5 m 21 1 4 6 Luca Sbisa C+ 25 $3.6 m 14 1 4 0 Dan Hamhuis C 32 $4.5 m 19 0 3 6 Yannick Weber D 27 $1.5 m 15 0 3 -7 Forwards Grade Age AAV GP G P +/- Daniel Sedin A 35 $7.0 m 22 10 23 5 Henrik Sedin A- 35 $7.0 m 22 7 21 7 Jared McCann B+ 19 $894 k 20 6 8 3 Jannik Hansen B 29 $2.5 m 22 6 13 10 Brandon Sutter B- 26 $3.3 m 16 4 8 4 Brandon Prust C+ 31 $2.5 m 11 0 5 1 Alex Burrows C 34 $4.5 m 21 5 11 -2 Radim Vrbata C 34 $5.0 m 20 4 9 -12 Derek Dorsett C 28 $2.7 m 22 2 5 -3 Adam Cracknell C 30 $575 k 16 3 4 2 Jake Virtanen C 19 $894 k 17 1 4 -2 Chris Higgins C 32 $2.5 m 10 2 2 1 Bo Horvat C- 20 $894 k 22 2 8 -10 Sven Baertschi C- 23 $900 k 19 2 7 -1 I think these grades are relative to the expectations for each player rather than relative to the league. Also, I doubt they've considered the level of competition that each player is facing. What is average? C+? I think the following are graded too low: Miller, Hamhuis, Burrows, Cracknell, Horvat, Baertschi The following are graded too high: Hutton, McCann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearditall Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 8 hours ago, Twilight Sparkle said: it's craig button He also had Virtanen before the draft at #46. A late 2nd rounder..?? He's a one of a kind type in a draft year. (Lucic, Bertuzzi, rare POWER forward type) I don't take to much of his opinion most of the times.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nave Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 What terrible rankings... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I think they're all bang-on. Miller may have looked good at times but his record is below .500, he doesn't deserve a B, maybe B- at the best. A few of our forwards deserve a D for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabcakes Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 8 hours ago, Twilight Sparkle said: it's craig button Ya, and still I keep trying to see the sense of his opinions. Does this make me insane? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Prophet Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 10 minutes ago, Crabcakes said: Ya, and still I keep trying to see the sense of his opinions. Does this make me insane? One sign of insanity is knowing something is wrong, but continuing to do It...so maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearditall Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 30 minutes ago, Crabcakes said: I think these grades are relative to the expectations for each player rather than relative to the league. Also, I doubt they've considered the level of competition that each player is facing. What is average? C+? I think the following are graded too low: Miller, Hamhuis, Burrows, Cracknell, Horvat, Baertschi The following are graded too high: Hutton, McCann Hutton, McCann? They have done MUCH more then expected. Those are B's for sure... Bartkowski "B"? I'll go with a "C+" Prust has been everything U could ask as well. Solid "B" Vrbata more of a "D" atleast Cracknell min. "C+" c'mon what were U really expecting??? 3G 4A +2 & brings much needed grit...Hello! Horvat is a "C+" atleast for the natural somewhat struggling sophmore Beast! And Miller has been "C to B-" Rest are fare... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Here are my grades.... erm.... my dog ate them..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Prophet Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 3 minutes ago, hearditall said: Hutton, McCann? They have done MUCH more then expected. Those are B's for sure... Bartkowski "B"? I'll go with a "C+" Prust has been everything U could ask as well. "B" as well. Vrbata more of a "D" Cracknell min. "C+" c'mon what were U really expecting??? 3G 4A +2 & brings much needed grit...Hello! Horvat is a "C+" atleast for the natural somewhat struggling sophmore Beast! And Miller has been "C to B-" Rest are fare... This is a good revision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 14 minutes ago, NaveJoseph said: What terrible rankings... Are they..?..some are flattering to some players,but some are obviously wrong (Miller,Burrows)...Hopefully,everybody is taking into account that they're not rating the' player',just their performance in the 1st quarter.... By the 3rd quarter,these rankings will look completely different... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabcakes Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 3 minutes ago, hearditall said: Hutton, McCann? They have done MUCH more then expected. Those are B's for sure... Bartkowski "B"? I'll go with a "C+" Prust has been everything U could ask as well. "B" as well. Vrbata more of a "D" Cracknell min. "C+" c'mon what were U really expecting??? 3G 4A +2 & brings much needed grit...Hello! Horvat is a "C+" atleast for the natural somewhat struggling sophmore Beast! And Miller has been "C to B-" Rest are fare... Hutton and McCann have done better than expected. I agree but they also play sheltered minutes. McCann isn't the Canucks 3rd best forward though (not yet) and Hutton has some work to show us that he's as good as Tanev. Compared to all of the players in the league, I give McCann a C (which would make him a competent 3/4C which is saying something for a 19 year old) and Hutton gets a C+ (which is average for the league or equivalent to a typical 3/4D.....and very good for a 5D) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 29 minutes ago, Crabcakes said: Ya, and still I keep trying to see the sense of his opinions. Does this make me insane? he gave james reimer an A+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.