Rush17 Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 6 hours ago, Rush17 said: On 9/14/2016 at 1:13 PM, Alflives said: didn't mean to quote u My phone sometimes get quotes stuck. when it happens i cant post without posting the quote lol. so annoying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 1 hour ago, Rush17 said: My phone sometimes get quotes stuck. when it happens i cant post without posting the quote lol. so annoying My mini pad thing is the same. I hate the Flames. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 5 hours ago, NUCKER67 said: The Canucks won't get Landeskog. Sakic isn't going to accept a Larsson type D for his young star captain. I think Chiarelli gave away too much to get Larsson, but maybe Hall was a problem in the room (primadonna) and he wanted him out. The Oilers also filled a need on their D. Sakic will ask a whole lot more for Landeskog. Probably something like Tanev + 1st. That's when JB hangs up the phone. If it's Tanev + 1st, I'll certainly think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realtor Rod Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 9 hours ago, Hugor Hill said: If it's Tanev + 1st, I'll certainly think about it. That's an easy deal. It would be more than that though. It would sure be nice to have Loui and Landy for 6 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 Wonder who will be available on the waiver wire... dont think the Canucks have assets to acquire a top 6. You have to draft them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70seven Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 4 minutes ago, Lui's Knob said: Wonder who will be available on the waiver wire... dont think the Canucks have assets to acquire a top 6. You have to draft them This is exactly what Im thinking. Why give up assets in a deal if you could potentially make an addition by bumping someone to the minors. Therell for sure be a couple players of interest, both dmen and wingers. And I believe that waiver wire goes off of last season standings to start, so Canucks have 3rd go at the available players. I really dont believe therell be a major trade, but if the twins and eriksson keep doing well at the WCH, I think that increases the odds of a deal as ownership will want to further support them. Should be interesting, but I dont see Tanev going anywhere unless theres another Dman coming back, or we find a deal to knock our socks off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 Trading anything of value towards our future for a 37 year old Marleau would be a huge mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garthsbutcher Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 49 minutes ago, flickyoursedin said: Trading anything of value towards our future for a 37 year old Marleau would be a huge mistake. A voice of reason!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 14 hours ago, Hugor Hill said: If it's Tanev + 1st, I'll certainly think about it. Then it's Tanev and one of Patrick, Liljegren, Vilardi or Vesalainen. Because without Tanev and 1 single injury to our blue line we're drafting top 5. Think it's worth it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IbanezRG Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 4 hours ago, Lui's Knob said: Wonder who will be available on the waiver wire... dont think the Canucks have assets to acquire a top 6. You have to draft them We do but we'd have to give up something that most fans don't want to give up (virt or boeser) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 2 hours ago, flickyoursedin said: Trading anything of value towards our future for a 37 year old Marleau would be a huge mistake. I agree entirely. but if we have a competitive camp and sbisa is on the outside looking in. would a sbisa + gaunce for Marleau be a terrible deal for a playoff push? I personally love the character gaunce has developed simmering in the AHL and I think it will help the team down the road with his grounded leadership. but would a gaunce, granlund, or other current 4th liner with upside be worth a marleau Ifor packaged with a sbisa. just thought I'd raise that as a question to be discussed. if they feel marleau has another 2-3 years of productive play.. would it be worth it for vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 Tanev for Landy straight up Larson and Tanev have similar contracts, so avs should pay a premium for his cap hit and being a dman. No way I'd add a 1st or one of our big name guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 1 minute ago, apollo said: Tanev for Landy straight up Larson and Tanev have similar contracts, so avs should pay a premium for his cap hit and being a dman. No way I'd add a 1st or one of our big name guys not a chance. tanev and a 1st maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 Just now, stawns said: not a chance. tanev and a 1st maybe. I agree Landy is slightly more valuable until you remember the salary cap... Tanev is on a better deal. I'd do Tanev + Sutter + 2nd + 3rd for Duchene Landy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigerian Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 12 minutes ago, apollo said: I agree Landy is slightly more valuable until you remember the salary cap... Tanev is on a better deal. I'd do Tanev + Sutter + 2nd + 3rd for Duchene Landy Oh would ya now. I'll try it on nhl 17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 Wonder if anders Lee and Lupul are dark horses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 21 minutes ago, Rush17 said: I agree entirely. but if we have a competitive camp and sbisa is on the outside looking in. would a sbisa + gaunce for Marleau be a terrible deal for a playoff push? I personally love the character gaunce has developed simmering in the AHL and I think it will help the team down the road with his grounded leadership. but would a gaunce, granlund, or other current 4th liner with upside be worth a marleau Ifor packaged with a sbisa. just thought I'd raise that as a question to be discussed. if they feel marleau has another 2-3 years of productive play.. would it be worth it for vancouver. If you could swing a deal that involved guys with little value that are waiver eligible and on the bubble like Grenier and Pedan I'd look into it but It might be a better move giving up more for Landeskog if he is on the market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.B Cooper Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 26 minutes ago, apollo said: Tanev for Landy straight up Larson and Tanev have similar contracts, so avs should pay a premium for his cap hit and being a dman. No way I'd add a 1st or one of our big name guys Love the enthusiasm, but nope. Not even close. You need to add that 1st at least. Tanev is great, but his lack of size and scoring will always keep his value lower than we think it should be. Also, the Larsen/Hall trade was a joke and will not dictate the market value of other Dmen. Every GM, fan, sports guy in the world knows Edmonton got bent over big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 28 minutes ago, apollo said: I agree Landy is slightly more valuable until you remember the salary cap... Tanev is on a better deal. I'd do Tanev + Sutter + 2nd + 3rd for Duchene Landy HAHAHA!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 1 hour ago, Warhippy said: Then it's Tanev and one of Patrick, Liljegren, Vilardi or Vesalainen. Because without Tanev and 1 single injury to our blue line we're drafting top 5. Think it's worth it? Sign Kris Russell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.