rekker Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, Yotes said: to boston for the 3rd round pick they just got from florida Done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 25 minutes ago, rekker said: Done. or to the Jets? they just recalled Poolman, RHD, played with Boeser @ ND, be interesting to see if Canucks have a scout at the game if he plays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 9 minutes ago, Yotes said: or to the Jets? they just recalled Poolman, RHD, played with Boeser @ ND, be interesting to see if Canucks have a scout at the game if he plays Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 1 hour ago, Rush17 said: Saw it on another board. Forget who the source was now. Yesterday was a long time ago. Ok so I looked it up. Believed to be a quote from Dhalliwal on Sportsnet 650 the Point. Yesterday. Haven't heard the clip myself but huge discussion on it. Thx for getting back Rush. Seems like a long shot. But Dhaliwal is one of very few who's word has value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 43 minutes ago, WHL rocks said: Thx for getting back Rush. Seems like a long shot. But Dhaliwal is one of very few who's word has value. Yeah no problem. I have no way of verifying the source unless I find the audio clip myself. I find it hard to locate specific clips off sportsnet 650's website though. if I locate it i'll share it. I'll take a peak later tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 1 hour ago, Rush17 said: Yeah no problem. I have no way of verifying the source unless I find the audio clip myself. I find it hard to locate specific clips off sportsnet 650's website though. if I locate it i'll share it. I'll take a peak later tonight. good enough, just wanted to know where you heard it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krizzel Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 Ok so maybe someone can enlighten me, i am asking for an honest opinion here, what's the rational behind trading a really solid performer, goal scorer and prob one of the only constants on our team for a later round draft pick that *might* result in a 3rd or 4th line player in a couple of years. I do get the point of unloading *old* players or veterans who want to go on a last cup run etc, but vanek isn't that old, and he is performing well (great actually and much better than we expected), so why don't we keep him as a foundation stone for the rebuild? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 7 minutes ago, krizzel said: Ok so maybe someone can enlighten me, i am asking for an honest opinion here, what's the rational behind trading a really solid performer, goal scorer and prob one of the only constants on our team for a later round draft pick that *might* result in a 3rd or 4th line player in a couple of years. I do get the point of unloading *old* players or veterans who want to go on a last cup run etc, but vanek isn't that old, and he is performing well (great actually and much better than we expected), so why don't we keep him as a foundation stone for the rebuild? When the rebuild is complete in 3-5 more years, will Vanek be part of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krizzel Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, Alflives said: When the rebuild is complete in 3-5 more years.." reminds me of something i heard 3 years ago ADD - and no he wont, i just checked and realized he is in his mid 30s, i somehow had the impression he's in the early 30s, so i take back my statement.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanless Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 8 minutes ago, Alflives said: When the rebuild is complete in 3-5 more years, will Vanek be part of it? But really who replaces him? he needs to provide an offensive role so our future offensive players aren’t rushed and relied too heavily on lind looks promising but it would be a shame to rush him dahlin could fill the role but why not make sure before making that hole as far as I’m concerned vanek should stay and play on a line with pettersson and Eriksdon to shelter the young lad eriksson-pettersson-vanek Vanek could certainly help get pettersson going offensively from the get go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 10 minutes ago, Wanless said: But really who replaces him? he needs to provide an offensive role so our future offensive players aren’t rushed and relied too heavily on lind looks promising but it would be a shame to rush him dahlin could fill the role but why not make sure before making that hole as far as I’m concerned vanek should stay and play on a line with pettersson and Eriksdon to shelter the young lad eriksson-pettersson-vanek Vanek could certainly help get pettersson going offensively from the get go Trade Vanek now, and resign him July 1st. Hi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 1 hour ago, krizzel said: Ok so maybe someone can enlighten me, i am asking for an honest opinion here, what's the rational behind trading a really solid performer, goal scorer and prob one of the only constants on our team for a later round draft pick that *might* result in a 3rd or 4th line player in a couple of years. I do get the point of unloading *old* players or veterans who want to go on a last cup run etc, but vanek isn't that old, and he is performing well (great actually and much better than we expected), so why don't we keep him as a foundation stone for the rebuild? Because his agent says that he is looking for term and market value. He also suggests that he is more likely to be interested to return if the Sedins return. An additional pick also allows to move up in the draft - for example Nashville used a 3rd to go from 46th to 38th to leapfrog a team who also wanted Josi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 1 hour ago, krizzel said: Ok so maybe someone can enlighten me, i am asking for an honest opinion here, what's the rational behind trading a really solid performer, goal scorer and prob one of the only constants on our team for a later round draft pick that *might* result in a 3rd or 4th line player in a couple of years. I do get the point of unloading *old* players or veterans who want to go on a last cup run etc, but vanek isn't that old, and he is performing well (great actually and much better than we expected), so why don't we keep him as a foundation stone for the rebuild? exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliboy Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 1 hour ago, krizzel said: Ok so maybe someone can enlighten me, i am asking for an honest opinion here, what's the rational behind trading a really solid performer, goal scorer and prob one of the only constants on our team for a later round draft pick that *might* result in a 3rd or 4th line player in a couple of years. I do get the point of unloading *old* players or veterans who want to go on a last cup run etc, but vanek isn't that old, and he is performing well (great actually and much better than we expected), so why don't we keep him as a foundation stone for the rebuild? It isn't for sure that he will resign with us, his agent has said exactly that, they will wait and look at the offers, so highest bidder. We may as well trade him then resign him if the number works, if someone else offers more then we've gained nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliboy Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 On 2/13/2018 at 10:56 AM, mll said: Benning doesn't know his trade value yet - says teams will start calling closer to the deadline. Also Vanek will not make a decision before the off-season. Sounds like he is looking for term and market value. He is also more likely to sign an extension if the Sedins return. Here it is, they would wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 14 hours ago, krizzel said: Ok so maybe someone can enlighten me, i am asking for an honest opinion here, what's the rational behind trading a really solid performer, goal scorer and prob one of the only constants on our team for a later round draft pick that *might* result in a 3rd or 4th line player in a couple of years. I do get the point of unloading *old* players or veterans who want to go on a last cup run etc, but vanek isn't that old, and he is performing well (great actually and much better than we expected), so why don't we keep him as a foundation stone for the rebuild? Vanek is old, signed a 1 yr deal with us. He has stated he would like a chance at a cup, so he is happy to move on to a playoff team. If he stayed here he would want a multi year deal with a raise, that doesnt make sense for a rebuilding team with multiple waiver eligible propsects next year. Let alone the arrival of annointed stud Gaudette & EP. Vanek is going to be 34, that is kind of old for the NHL. Keep Vanek as a foundation stone for the rebuild? Wow that is a shock to hear those words, this guys was a FA until the end of August, doesnt scream like that type of player at all. Everyone says oh he is good for Boeser, well they knew each other before this year, surely they will continue to train in the off season back in their homes in Minnesota. You move Vanek for a pick because well we need more of them, as a rebuilding team we lack picks quite frankly and he & maybe Hutton are the only guys that will likely be gone this TDL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 13 hours ago, aliboy said: Here it is, they would wait. Ya Vanek wants to play for a winner on his next contract not here. He plays 3rd line minutes with us, why not do that on a playoff caliber team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 10 minutes ago, Yotes said: Vanek is old, signed a 1 yr deal with us. He has stated he would like a chance at a cup, so he is happy to move on to a playoff team. If he stayed here he would want a multi year deal with a raise, that doesnt make sense for a rebuilding team with multiple waiver eligible propsects next year. Let alone the arrival of annointed stud Gaudette & EP. Vanek is going to be 34, that is kind of old for the NHL. Keep Vanek as a foundation stone for the rebuild? Wow that is a shock to hear those words, this guys was a FA until the end of August, doesnt scream like that type of player at all. Everyone says oh he is good for Boeser, well they knew each other before this year, surely they will continue to train in the off season back in their homes in Minnesota. You move Vanek for a pick because well we need more of them, as a rebuilding team we lack picks quite frankly and he & maybe Hutton are the only guys that will likely be gone this TDL Get what you can for him for sure. If we do re-sign him. One year deal only please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanless Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 14 hours ago, Alflives said: Trade Vanek now, and resign him July 1st. Hi That would be nice But is that not looked down on by the league and potential tampering? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdgarM Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 36 minutes ago, Yotes said: Vanek is old, signed a 1 yr deal with us. He has stated he would like a chance at a cup, so he is happy to move on to a playoff team. If he stayed here he would want a multi year deal with a raise, that doesnt make sense for a rebuilding team with multiple waiver eligible propsects next year. Let alone the arrival of annointed stud Gaudette & EP. Vanek is going to be 34, that is kind of old for the NHL. Keep Vanek as a foundation stone for the rebuild? Wow that is a shock to hear those words, this guys was a FA until the end of August, doesnt scream like that type of player at all. Everyone says oh he is good for Boeser, well they knew each other before this year, surely they will continue to train in the off season back in their homes in Minnesota. You move Vanek for a pick because well we need more of them, as a rebuilding team we lack picks quite frankly and he & maybe Hutton are the only guys that will likely be gone this TDL Yet we want to resign 2 players that are probably worse off then Vanek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.