Diamonds Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 If Hamonic decides to opt out of the season or retire. To Vancouver Cal Foote To Tampa Bay Olli Juolevi The idea behind this trade is to trade Juolevi for a RD of similar profile and development to fill Hamonic's hole on the roster. Would you do this trade? Would Tampa? Does anything need to be added? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamonds Posted October 1, 2021 Author Share Posted October 1, 2021 Personally I still believe OJ can become a decent NHLer but with the emergence of Rathbone he is now a potentially expendable trade chip. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 (edited) Not really sure what’s in it for Tampa. Right shot D are generally more valuable than left shot D. Also,based on their depth chart, I don’t see Juolevi having a shot at the top 6 short of a few injuries. Just my opinion but I think they keep their right shot D who has at least stayed healthy for the most part Edited October 2, 2021 by qwijibo 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNate Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 We'd have to add a fair bit, Foote is a much better D than OJ. I'd happily add a fair amount to OJ to get Rutta or Foote though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 Rathbone for Foote would be their counteroffer. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNate Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 1 minute ago, King Heffy said: Rathbone for Foote would be their counteroffer. I'd do that, with some apprehension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 IDK the way people view OJ on these boards we would probably have to add 3x 1st round picks to unload him for Foote ;P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 9 minutes ago, BCNate said: I'd do that, with some apprehension. Me too, fair hockey trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 Does Foote need waivers when TBay sends him down? Let’s just claim him the? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 38 minutes ago, Alflives said: Does Foote need waivers when TBay sends him down? Let’s just claim him the? He does require waivers. That doesn’t mean Tampa won’t keep him on the roster as a 7th D. Also you’re assuming the 8 teams with waiver priority ahead of Vancouver won’t claim him if he does hit waivers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewbieCanuckFan Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 3 hours ago, qwijibo said: He does require waivers. That doesn’t mean Tampa won’t keep him on the roster as a 7th D. Also you’re assuming the 8 teams with waiver priority ahead of Vancouver won’t claim him if he does hit waivers Since you normally have 6 defenseman iced, don't most/all team carry 7 defensemen on their roster (barring a ton of injuries). Their AHL affiliate isn't in Florida. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 6 minutes ago, NewbieCanuckFan said: Since you normally have 6 defenseman iced, don't most/all team carry 7 defensemen on their roster (barring a ton of injuries). Their AHL affiliate isn't in Florida. That was exactly my point. they can kept him as a 7th D rather than risk losing him on waivers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewbieCanuckFan Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 (edited) 5 minutes ago, qwijibo said: That was exactly my point. they can kept him as a 7th D rather than risk losing him on waivers Probably can even go with a one less forward & have 7 defensemen on the iced roster (as a number of NHL coaches have done). Bieksa patrolling up front as a forward was interesting in the good old days. Edited October 2, 2021 by NewbieCanuckFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjick the Warrior Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 Juolevi will be lucky to be the 7th defenseman as Keeper and Rathbone are ahead of him, also Juolevi is paired with Burroughs an AHL player and I doubt Greener would pair an opening night player with a for sure AHL player during the preseason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 8 minutes ago, IjustNEEDaTROYgamble said: Juolevi will be lucky to be the 7th defenseman as Keeper and Rathbone are ahead of him, also Juolevi is paired with Burroughs an AHL player and I doubt Greener would pair an opening night player with a for sure AHL player during the preseason Keeper got injured in camp and just had surgery. He broke his leg. If you watched today's game OJ was one of the few good standouts, even over Rathbone. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjick the Warrior Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 7 minutes ago, Junkyard Dog said: Keeper got injured in camp and just had surgery. He broke his leg. If you watched today's game OJ was one of the few good standouts, even over Rathbone. I only caught the first period, but he did not play well in Spokane sorry not Keeper but Hunt is who I meant I got them mixed up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 2 minutes ago, IjustNEEDaTROYgamble said: I only caught the first period, but he did not play well in Spokane sorry not Keeper but Hunt is who I meant I got them mixed up It wasn't a great game but we had a weaker lineup. Hunt didn't play great but he wasn't terrible. Rathbone was the same. Burroughs was better than them both tonight and Schenn was the worst D tonight. Myer was the best D which isn't surprising as he was the only NHL regular and OJ was the 2nd best. OJ/Myers saw a lot of PK time as Flames kept racking consecutive PPs. They had like 6 PPs and OJ was not scored on any of them when he was on. The only goal they score was an empty net PP late in the 3rd with Myers and I think Hunt/Burroughs out because we tried pulling the goalie on the PK. Not many positives. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 Juolevi and WPG 3rd for Foote, I'd do it. OEL POOLMAN HUGHES FOOTE RATHBONE MYERS HUNT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drakrami Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 Juolevi is no longer a highly touted prospect for a few years already. And here we have Juolevi for Tampa's #1 prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewbieCanuckFan Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 (edited) 13 hours ago, morrissex95 said: Juolevi and WPG 3rd for Foote, I'd do it. OEL POOLMAN HUGHES FOOTE RATHBONE MYERS HUNT So would I. Problem is, Tampa would hang up the phone if offered that. Edited October 2, 2021 by NewbieCanuckFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now