Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[GDT] December 10, 2021 Winnipeg Jets (13-9-2-2) @ Vancouver Canucks (10-15-1-1) at 7:00 pm on SportsNet.

Rate this topic


Goal:thecup

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, DefCon1 said:

I dont know what you are talking about? You forgot all the bertuzzi goalie interference when he would brush the goalie in blue paint and they would call it goalie interference? You probably dont read the rulebook. Its not about how hard the goalie is interfered with because even brushing them in blue ice right before a goal has been called goalie interference. Go check the NHL rulebook on that. If it impedes with the goalie making the save then it will be called. Its not about how hard the goalie was hit or if he would have made the save or not, that doesnt make sense at all.

Rule 69 – Interference on the Goalkeeper 
69.1 Interference on the Goalkeeper - This rule is based on the premise 
that an attacking player’s position, whether inside or outside the 
crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be 
allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking 
players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances 
be allowed. Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking 
player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s 
ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an 
attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a 
goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact 
with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when 
such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the 
attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact. 
The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice 
judgement of the Referee(s), but may be subject to a Coach’s 
Challenge (see Rule 38).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm on crazy amount pain killers and morphine...

 

But these 2 guys 2nd intermission complete sucking energy

 

They're so boring.. not made for TV

 

Especially the young brown guy in middle

 

Gtfo my TV.. leave this guy on YouTube podcast 

 

Thank you...

  • Wat 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Coconuts said:

Ekblad is a player who can do it all at both ends, he'll be 26 in February 

 

Parayko will be 29 next spring, and I don't consider him as high end 

 

Good player tho

 

But Florida would be nuts to move Ekblad

Ekblads the best dman in the world.  He probably wouldve won norris last yr if not for his injury.   No gm in their right mind would trade him. 

 

Love parayko but we cant afford him.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bure_of_94 said:

I wouldn’t say brutal, they’re letting them play. But they’ve definately missed 1 or 2 that we should have got a PP for. 

I have seen several wrestling takeouts of Canuck players in front of the Jet net just like Miller got penalized for but they are not being called. What gives with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...