• Announcements

    • Templeton Peck

      BOARD SPECIFIC RULES   02/05/2016

      These are board specific rules, meant to try to make the Trades and Free Agent Signings forum better for everyone. YOU MUST READ AND ABIDE BY THESE FORUM RULES.

      1. If an event happens, wait a few minutes before posting, in all likelihood, someone has already posted it. We don't want numerous threads on the same event, so please search before posting.

      2. Please provide a clearly identifiable topic title for your thread so that user's can search for and find the appropriate thread easily. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate. This is to help avoid duplicate threads and to make searching easier. For any and all comments, please use the Topic Description box instead of the title.

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriately label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].

      3. All trades, signings, rumours and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread.

      The following are NOT considered valid sources: Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Hockeybuzz, Spector's Hockey and The Fourth Period are currently acceptable sources.

      The NHL Line, Brochu is Hockey and NHL Hockey News by saint Pako are currently invalid sources.

      4. Clearly misrepresenting the contents of your thread or posting false Trades/Signings/Acquisitions to send the forum into a frenzy will be taken very seriously and will result in an automatic suspension.

      5. Please put all proposals into the proposals forum and NOT this forum. Proposals found in this forum will be moved or deleted without warning.

      6. Please report any threads or messages that violate these or other board rules to the administrators or moderators() Do not respond by posting spammy messages such as 'IBTL', and 'LOCK AND BAN', or by attacking other users. The report button is located to the bottom left of every post.

      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM one of the Moderators or Administrators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Templeton Peck

[Discussion] Roberto Luongo Trade Thread 5.0

3,021 posts in this topic

Holtby is a perfect back up.

Johannson is a perfect 3rd line C

Brouwer is the 3rd line grit that will put us over the top.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me if I were MG I would put together two or three deals and forward to

the caps

Panthers

TML's

Flyers and tell all teams I have sent out deals to more then 2 teams and this is my final deal for you and see who bites first!

That way you get what you want and play them back and forth for the next two days and tell them 1 day to think about it and get back to me.look over what deal is best then trade Luo.This way the other GM's will be calling each other and will know whom the teams are and one should bite by then and a deal is done.if none bite then keep Luo till trade deadline and put deals together for teams looking and get what he wants.I can't see us keeping two number ones till then and thats why I think MG has to do something sooner then later and get it done!Or Luo wnts to goto the panthers give them 24 hours then ask the others and tell luo a deal cant be done with them so move on.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Holtby is a perfect back up.

Johannson is a perfect 3rd line C

Brouwer is the 3rd line grit that will put us over the top.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Johansson is not imo a good player to fill the role of 3rd line C. He's under sized, and bad on faceoffs with a carreer avg of 42%. He is -7 in 7 games this year, with zero points, and zero hits.

He does have some offensive upside, but the other downfalls of his game at the moment out weigh what he could potentially provide on the score sheet.

Brouwer is a perfect fit. He's 27 years old 6'2" - 214lbs. Hes a -2, but has 3 goals, 4 points, and 21 hits in 7 games this season. He's also 50% on the draw after 48 attempts and is averaging 19 mins of ice thus far. Plus he's a local kid, and would likley be jacked to play here.

Potentially having him on either the 2nd or 3rd line would give us added depth, and make the Canucks that much harder to play against.

Brouwer, Forsberg, Neuvirth/Holtby would be SOLID return.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Johansson is not imo a good player to fill the role of 3rd line C. He's under sized, and bad on faceoffs with a carreer avg of 42%. He is -7 in 7 games this year, with zero points, and zero hits.

He does have some offensive upside, but the other downfalls of his game at the moment out weigh what he could potentially provide on the score sheet.

Brouwer is a perfect fit. He's 27 years old 6'2" - 214lbs. Hes a -2, but has 3 goals, 4 points, and 21 hits in 7 games this season. He's also 50% on the draw after 48 attempts and is averaging 19 mins of ice thus far. Plus he's a local kid, and would likley be jacked to play here.

Potentially having him on either the 2nd or 3rd line would give us added depth, and make the Canucks that much harder to play against.

Brouwer, Forsberg, Neuvirth/Holtby would be SOLID return.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, get Brouwer over here..

Brouwer, prospect, goalie & a 2nd.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brouwer, Kuznetsov, Holtby & a 2nd for Luongo?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Johansson is not imo a good player to fill the role of 3rd line C. He's under sized, and bad on faceoffs with a carreer avg of 42%. He is -7 in 7 games this year, with zero points, and zero hits.

He does have some offensive upside, but the other downfalls of his game at the moment out weigh what he could potentially provide on the score sheet.

Brouwer is a perfect fit. He's 27 years old 6'2" - 214lbs. Hes a -2, but has 3 goals, 4 points, and 21 hits in 7 games this season. He's also 50% on the draw after 48 attempts and is averaging 19 mins of ice thus far. Plus he's a local kid, and would likley be jacked to play here.

Potentially having him on either the 2nd or 3rd line would give us added depth, and make the Canucks that much harder to play against.

Brouwer, Forsberg, Neuvirth/Holtby would be SOLID return.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Washington (or any team for that matter) is in on one of our goalies I think the Canucks need to go big or go home. I don't want a 3rd line C. We have depth up the middle for when Henrik starts to decline. What would it take to pry ovi out of Washington. Schneider would be a huge chip. Booth may have some value if he comes back strong. Raymond and Hansen as well. I know that this isn't enough to land him but if you throw in enough of these pieces plus some of our better prospects plus however many firsts it would take to land him why not make a run?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

brouwer, perreault/wolski, conditionial 1st

for

luo

raymond

Brouwer is an upgrade over raymond without a doubt.

I also wouldnt mind trying to get wolski from them somehow, he has good playmaking skills.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who has noticed that Galiev is in the ECHL right now? An injury also put him out for half of the 11-12 season. I'll pass as a thrown in or otherwise.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Washington (or any team for that matter) is in on one of our goalies I think the Canucks need to go big or go home. I don't want a 3rd line C. We have depth up the middle for when Henrik starts to decline. What would it take to pry ovi out of Washington. Schneider would be a huge chip. Booth may have some value if he comes back strong. Raymond and Hansen as well. I know that this isn't enough to land him but if you throw in enough of these pieces plus some of our better prospects plus however many firsts it would take to land him why not make a run?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forsberg is years away from making the NHL. And he's a winger

We need Johanssen now, he isn't huge but he isn't tiny either.

I am not sure how Forsberg makes us better than Johanssen, he'd be a better 3rd C than Schroeder thats for sure.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. No more secondary players, trade a bigger package for elite.

Backstrom would be the best target. Better all round player and cap friendlier.

There no way The Caps are trading Brouwer. They just traded for him, signed him and is playing on their top line.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, you just said Backstrom would be the best target then after that said there is no way the Caps trade Brouwer? Huh??

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, meant to say Backstrom is their most valuable player and MG should at least ask. I don't think Backstrom or Brouwer are available.

IMO MG should try for Forsberg and a goalie.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forsberg is years away from making the NHL. And he's a winger

We need Johanssen now, he isn't huge but he isn't tiny either.

I am not sure how Forsberg makes us better than Johanssen, he'd be a better 3rd C than Schroeder thats for sure.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.