Outsiders Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 I know its Eklund but there is no Canucks rumours/trades to talk about so why not? Discuss. On Kadri... Only hearing Vancouver with interest, but it's maybe more than most are letting on...one source believes this is the next deal the Leafs make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 I thought Kadri was one of their untouchables...Eklund trying to create traffic I assume? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted February 28, 2015 Author Share Posted February 28, 2015 I thought Kadri was one of their untouchables...Eklund trying to create traffic I assume? For the right price i think anyone on the leafs is Tradable. only true untouchable might be Reilly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 The player I see them asking us for is Tanev and I wouldn't do that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 A powerplay with the Sedins and Kadri is drool worthy ... not interested in what it would take to get him though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 lul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted February 28, 2015 Author Share Posted February 28, 2015 The player I see them asking us for is Tanev and I wouldn't do that You would give up Tanev for a 50 point 2nd liner and only 24? I would Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 I wonder what it would take Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 You would give up Tanev for a 50 point 2nd liner and only 24? I would Well than u are silly because Tanev is our number 2 d man- what's harder to get- a number 2 d man or a light weight one dimensional 50 point player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 A powerplay with the Sedins and Kadri is drool worthy ... not interested in what it would take to get him though. the wrong kind of drool though (besides, the ABCs of the Sedins on the powerplay spell 'right handed shot') Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 How would he fit in- below average 2C in the east- how does he translate to the west? We already have a below average 2C - Bonino, and he is cheaper and a bit better defensively Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Well than u are silly because Tanev is our number 2 d man- what's harder to get- a number 2 d man or a light weight one dimensional 50 point player He shouldn't be a #2 Dman he just pairs well with Edler. I do like him though just not sure he's a #2 Dman yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanGnome Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 I'd trade Tanev in a heart beat if it's for Kadri + say someone like Komarov. I'd deal Tanev + Gaunce for Kadri and Komarov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derp... Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Kadri replaces either Richardson, Bonino, or Matthias. If we can get Kadri for a prospect and a pick, then flip one of the above for a similar pick I would do it. We basically would come out of it with a 2/3 centre and maybe a second rounder for a UFA, 2nd rounder and a decent prospect like Jensen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drfeelgood Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Kadri would get killed in the west, but Tanev is also over rated as a #2 D. Perhaps on our depleted defence, he shines. Although he is a very smart defence man, his shot is below average and he can be knocked off the puck in heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 The only assets TO has that I want are their 1st, Reilly and Nylander and they would be stupid to move those guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 To does need a goalie: Markstrom or Lack, our 2015 first and Corrado for Reilly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 There are a number of guys they should move before considering dealing Kadri, who happens to be one of their best puck possession players, particularly after having moved Santo and Winnik - and he's young. Seems like a Toronto type move though, now that he's exceeded (the realistic side of) expectations imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 If he's not a top 2 center we wanna build around whats the point? Clearly Toronto wants to dump him for a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Well next two years if he doesn't break 50 points he will be a dissapointment for how high he was picked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.