Vanisleryan Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 With our Defensive depth looking better and better. I was looking at players we could possibly acquire via trade and wondered what people thought of Artemi Panarin. With the Hawks still up against it and needing some D aswell. Would you do... To Vancouver : Artemi Panarin To Chicago : Chris Tanev, 2017 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Stammer- Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 no way in hell Chicago takes that, It would be worth a try but I imagine Chi would want more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanisleryan Posted October 1, 2016 Author Share Posted October 1, 2016 If they wanted more it would be in the form of prospects or picks...we could add that Columbus 2nd or even add Gaunce. I think Chicago would love Gaunces work ethic. ...that gives them an established player a high pick and a solid prospect. We are going to have to pay to get that high end left winger and Panarin would be perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 I wouldn't be giving up Tanev and a 1st. I wouldn't trade for Panarin with Tanev in the package at all. IMO, just because Panarin has a good rookie season, (in his mid twenties, with Pat Kane as his linemate) does not mean he's "proven", not by a mile. Spisa, Gaunce/Etem and a 1st. Bowman hangs up the phone. I don't call back. If the Canucks prove they have an incredible defense that can actually afford to lose Tanev without going back to being terrible, I'd consider trading him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainKool Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 But we don't have Patrick Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 yeah?....with our track record trading with the Hawks..........I say no!....Just no! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 Panarin to me doesn't seem like a player that will maintain his level of play over a long career. Semin esq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 Panarin is semin 2.0 if I'm trading Tanev its for a heart and soul 60+ point player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 Tanev's aces, but heard he's a smoker?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanB Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 Hilarious! Unproven rookie gets lucky and has a 3pt night in a preseason game and all of a sudden people think we can afford to ship out our best defenceman. Our overall defence has proven nothing yet. We'll undoubtedly be better with Gud and the reality that it couldn't really be worse - but trading our most consistent, reliable D at this point isn't advisable imo. Larsson, Tryamkin, Stecher, Pedan, ect are still too unproven to be shipping out Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsMillerTime Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 I wouldn't even take this deal for the Canucks. Giving up their best d and loosing a 1st rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ojibwa72 Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 14 hours ago, Vanisleryan said: With our Defensive depth looking better and better. I was looking at players we could possibly acquire via trade and wondered what people thought of Artemi Panarin. With the Hawks still up against it and needing some D aswell. Would you do... To Vancouver : Artemi Panarin To Chicago : Chris Tanev, 2017 1st. Switch Tanev For Edler in there and you might have something. Edler might waive to go to Chicago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GB5 Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 15 hours ago, Vanisleryan said: With our Defensive depth looking better and better. I was looking at players we could possibly acquire via trade and wondered what people thought of Artemi Panarin. With the Hawks still up against it and needing some D aswell. Would you do... To Vancouver : Artemi Panarin To Chicago : Chris Tanev, 2017 1st. I actually think the Hawks would love that deal....it's selling high. Problem is a smallish greedy Russian capitalizing on one good year isn't what Vancouver needs if they have to give a top pairing d-man and a first round pick. Panarin still has this year to prove what he is worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 I want the hockey gods to smile on us and give us a break for a change. Get 1st overall and draft Patrick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanisleryan Posted October 1, 2016 Author Share Posted October 1, 2016 Regardless I do think that with the cap squeeze some teams facing this year combined with the expansion draft, this is the best chance for the Canucks to pull off a detailed trade to get us a legit scoring winger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knucks16 Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 2 hours ago, GarthButcher5 said: I actually think the Hawks would love that deal....it's selling high. Problem is a smallish greedy Russian capitalizing on one good year isn't what Vancouver needs if they have to give a top pairing d-man and a first round pick. Panarin still has this year to prove what he is worth. Personally I'd rather have Kucherov! but I'd take Panarin aswell:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 I'd do that deal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHockeyNerds Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 On 2016-09-30 at 7:53 PM, CaptainKool said: But we don't have Patrick Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 On 9/30/2016 at 6:11 PM, Vanisleryan said: With our Defensive depth looking better and better. I was looking at players we could possibly acquire via trade and wondered what people thought of Artemi Panarin. With the Hawks still up against it and needing some D aswell. Would you do... To Vancouver : Artemi Panarin To Chicago : Chris Tanev, 2017 1st. This proposal (not you) is really bad. Sorry to say it, but it is. Tanev is a FAR BETTER player than this Panarin guy. We don't want this Parnarin. He's playing with Patrick Kane, or Jonathan Toews. Plus, he's just too old for our next core. If Tanev is traded, which I am in favor of, it should be for a YOUNG center, like: Sam Reinhart or Leon Draisatl. Sorry, but NO to Parnarin. He's just not that good, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 On 9/30/2016 at 8:11 PM, Vanisleryan said: With our Defensive depth looking better and better. I was looking at players we could possibly acquire via trade and wondered what people thought of Artemi Panarin. With the Hawks still up against it and needing some D aswell. Would you do... To Vancouver : Artemi Panarin To Chicago : Chris Tanev, 2017 1st. "Hey Chicago, you know how Patrick Kane just had his best offensive season? Well, that was all him and not the fact that he was paired with an incredibly skilled line mate." On 9/30/2016 at 0:30 AM, billabong said: Panarin is semin 2.0 I get it, because he's Russian, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.