RetroCanuck Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 With the Canucks falling apart with injuries, aging/slowing Vets and even Mumps its pretty obvious now that the Canucks aren't going to make the playoffs and need to sell/rebuild. Therefore this deadline the Canucks should trade Hansen, Burrows, Miller and Sbisa. During the offseason the Canucks should also move Edler. Those 5 should be traded before next season. Could see signing Miller as UFA in summer. Proposals (retain salary/ take salary as need be) Hansen---->Minnesota for prospect(Greenway) and 5th 2018 Burrows--->Montreal for 3rd 2017 Miller------>LA or Anaheim for 1st 2017 or 2nd 2017+4th2018 Sbisa------>Pittsburgh or Boston for prospect Edler------>Montreal for 2018 1st Dorsett--->anyone for bag of pucks. Hutton(Love the guy but...)+Columbus 2nd 2017--->Colorado Landeskog Next years deadline Sedins---->contender and give them the chance they deserve to win a cup. Even if we don't get as much value back as we would want. Then sign them back on 1year deals that summer. (trade UFAs Sbisa/Hansen if not already traded.) Move out the old and bring in the new. Next years lineup will be young but new and fast. Baertschi-Horvat-Boeser Landeskog-Granlund-Eriksson Sedins-Sutter Labate-Gaunce-Chaput Rodin/Boucher Juolevi-Tavev Tryamkin-Stetcher (McEneny,Subban,Pedan,collegekid)-Gudbranson Markstrom UFA (Miller?) Canucks would be a much younger, fast team with more depth in the pipeline. Gaudette, Demko, Lockwood, Brisebois to name some. Plus players acquired in trades. Let me know what you think and if I should tell Benning that this is the plan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaerToBo Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 *Hansen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RetroCanuck Posted February 26, 2017 Author Share Posted February 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, BaerToBo said: *Hansen haha thanks was mixing Jannik with Hansen...Jansen lol. Other then my spelling mistake "thanks" ;p . What else did you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seven pounds soft Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Lol ^ i agree with the concept although some of the values are off. Fire sale time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 My eyes have been glossing over when I see a multiple trade proposal of late, but did you just trade all of our left side defencemen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silky mitts Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 that won't net you landeskog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 The only trade that happens in that group is possibly the Burrows to Montreal for a 3rd. All the other trades don't happen as the other GMs say no...very quickly. (well, Sbisa could get traded but I don't see to Boston or Pittsburgh) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sedintwinpowersactivate Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Miller is not getting that to be a backup rental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Do we really want to give up a 22 year old top four dman, with elite offence potential, for a guy like Landeskog, who has concussion issues, and is trending downward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 All we need now is the scurvy outbreak and the meltdown is complete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 28 minutes ago, Alflives said: Do we really want to give up a 22 year old top four dman, with elite offence potential, for a guy like Landeskog, who has concussion issues, and is trending downward? Duchene for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuardian_ Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 29 minutes ago, Alflives said: Do we really want to give up a 22 year old top four dman, with elite offence potential, for a guy like Landeskog, who has concussion issues, and is trending downward? I know I am repeating myself over and over again but JP, IMO has the potential to excel and he would be worth trading two potential top 4 dmen. There just isn't any others out there with the potential to fill what the Sedins can do, game after game. He is only one of three needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 horvat tryamkin stecher are the only Canucks REGULARS that shouldn't/ wouldn't be available. picks and top prospects would also be unavaible or extremely expensive. Doesn't mean trade the team just saying that for the right return the list of untouchables for a team in Vancouvers position should be very short. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 1 hour ago, Sedintwinpowersactivate said: Miller is not getting that to be a backup rental. LA doesn't need him either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RetroCanuck Posted February 26, 2017 Author Share Posted February 26, 2017 26 minutes ago, Sbriggs said: LA doesn't need him either Heard that LA wants an experienced Vet backup so wouldn't be surprised. Honestly don't know what his value is but it has to be pretty high for a guy that can be a number one guy if needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 13 minutes ago, RetroCanuck said: Heard that LA wants an experienced Vet backup so wouldn't be surprised. Honestly don't know what his value is but it has to be pretty high for a guy that can be a number one guy if needed How exactly is Budaj NOT and experienced vet backup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 15 minutes ago, RetroCanuck said: Heard that LA wants an experienced Vet backup so wouldn't be surprised. Honestly don't know what his value is but it has to be pretty high for a guy that can be a number one guy if needed A 2nd maybe and we would have to take their back in return Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RetroCanuck Posted February 26, 2017 Author Share Posted February 26, 2017 Just now, qwijibo said: How exactly is Budaj NOT and experienced vet backup? Let me rephrase that for you, a capable good quality veteran goalie. millers played twice as many games, wins more consistently then budaj and has an overall better sv%. If Quick goes down again with injury to his groin again (quite possible) who would you rather have in net for the playoffs, Budaj or Miller? LA is aging and this may be their last chance to contend. Would not be surprised at all to see Miller go there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 6 minutes ago, RetroCanuck said: Let me rephrase that for you, a capable good quality veteran goalie. millers played twice as many games, wins more consistently then budaj and has an overall better sv%. If Quick goes down again with injury to his groin again (quite possible) who would you rather have in net for the playoffs, Budaj or Miller? LA is aging and this may be their last chance to contend. Would not be surprised at all to see Miller go there. In L.A's case. I take Budaj. He's carried them through the season and they know what they have in him. The last time Miller was traded at the deadline was an unmitigated disaster. He was awful in St Louis. Not saying that would be the case in LA. But they already know they have a guy that can carry the mail in a Budaj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RetroCanuck Posted February 26, 2017 Author Share Posted February 26, 2017 9 minutes ago, Sbriggs said: A 2nd maybe and we would have to take their back in return Yep we'd probably have to take back Teddy Purcell(1.6M) Rob Scuderi(1.1M) and 60%Miller salary. Then we could ask for a high pick or decent prospect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.