Brick Tamland Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Lack, Kassian, Tanev and Shink for OEL and Hanzal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 would not include Horvat unless OEL was involved. Something like Horvat, Tanev, Kassian, Shinkaruk for OEL, and Hanzel which would never happen anyway. what is going on here? I am seriously confused. Are we really just going to start trading all our young guys? So you are trading, our 2nd best d man, and two future top 6 forwards for a PP qb who is not Norris Calibre and a washed up below average 2C who has a career high of 40 points???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bo.Horvat53 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Horvat and a pick? Hahha. Should be Horvat for Hanzal AND a pick if anything. Either way Horvat isn't going anywhere, especially not for a 3rd line center who Is 27. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noseforthenet Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 For Hanzal... Gaunce. That's it. Maybe an expiring UFA. In no way is Hanzal worth Horvat and a pick or any of our good prospects and a pick. Never scored 20, apparently injury prone, and all of the sudden he's worth that?! Realistically... He is worth a 2nd and a 4th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Relyt Krets Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Hanzal would fit in great. If they want Horvat though.... Yandle, OEL or Boedker better be the main piece coming back. It probably wouldn't ever happen but I'll take any of the 4 as any of them would fit I believe. Gaunce, Kassian, Lack, Bieksa, Higgins could I think all be used to get the process started Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Hanzal is a monster. No Bo though please k thx. Hanzal for lack kassian 4th pceeee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 shinkaruk/gaunce, 3rd, and higgins is the most I'd do. Higgins and 3rd for me. Might not get a deal done. But Hanzal is not a priority for us. rumor out of springfield pulkkinen is asking for a trade He led their AHL team in scoring, amongst tops in the league if I'm not mistaken? That would be a more viable target than Hanzal, big time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gizmo2337 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Two words for Hanzal. No thanks. Keep Dreaming. Adious Amigos. Don't Need. Go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColinP Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I would love to have Martin Hanzal as our number 2 center going forward as he is huge (6 ft 6, 230 pounds) and would be great for us when having to battle other big teams, but at the expense of Bo Horvat? Not a chance Although Hanzal is just 27, is a big guy who can produce and in my opinion has the potential to be a number 2 center if he isn't already, Horvat is a good young player and would be stupid to trade away...every successful team has a good two way forward (LA, Chicago, Boston, etc) and Horvat has second line potential. Although Hanzal's contract is very good considering what you get out of him, definitely not at the expense of Horvat, no way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Why is everyone jumping down Friedmans throat All he said was the canucks were interested in hanzel and Phoenix would be asking for a prospect like Horvat in return Pretty straight forward comment If you're not panicking and overreacting to every minute thing, you're not cdc'ing right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Just thinking of our potential third line if we got Hanzal... Sedin - Sedin - Vrbata Burrows - Bonino - Vey Matthias - Hanzal - Kassian Dorsett/Higgins - Horvat - Hansen Who wouldn't be foaming at the mouth at the thought of that third line? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seven pounds soft Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Just thinking of our potential third line if we got Hanzal... Sedin - Sedin - Vrbata Burrows - Bonino - Vey Matthias - Hanzal - Kassian Dorsett/Higgins - Horvat - Hansen Who wouldn't be foaming at the mouth at the thought of that third line? Lots of people. Including me. We have enough third liners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Lol at everyone calling Hanzal a 3rd liner... He would immediately become the teams #2 center. His got all the tools. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roland Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 giving up Bo wouldn't make our team any better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bo.Horvat53 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Lol at everyone calling Hanzal a 3rd liner... He would immediately become the teams #2 center. His got all the tools. Maybe, he's got to earn it though. He can't just come in here and expect to be 2C. Plus, he doesn't have to do much to outplay Bonino at this point. It would be good to have some internal competition for the 2C spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Why are people complaining about Rumours in the "Trades, Rumours, and Signings" section People just like to complain I suppose. As for what Phoenix (Arizona) wants for Hanzal, no thanks. Bo has been great for us and is 19 years old. Not happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Why are people complaining about Rumours in the "Trades, Rumours, and Signings" section People just like to complain I suppose. As for what Phoenix (Arizona) wants for Hanzal, no thanks. Bo has been great for us and is 19 years old. Not happening. Yeah, I mean it's basically a price that a contending team that is just missing a bonafide 3C/solid 2C would be willing to pay, not a fringe playoff team who is rebuilding/re-tooling - whatever you may prefer to call it. I would wager that someone pays lower to that price (still steep for a guy like Hanzal), but not us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87Crosby Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Maybe we want to get him so he doesn't destroy us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deadendpath Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Anyone saying no to Hanzal obviously only sees him play whenever it's against Vancouver. Give your heads a shake. The guy is a monster. Would be a great addition to our 2nd/3rd line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Martin Hanzal is exactly what the 2010-2011 Canucks could have used. This team or ownership or managent or whomever could use a reality check- we are in a rebuild mode Sedins- old Luongo Kesler Erhoff Schneider Mitchell Gone For pretty much nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.