Darius Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 They won't. It's suicide. exactly... If they give up their 9th their GM should be fired. Im thinking its their second rounder thats in play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaner Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 They won't. It's suicide. I think they could. Right now, they are in a retool/rebuild, but with core guys like Burns, Thornton, Marleau, and Pavelski getting older, their time to win is now, unless they trade away a few of those guys and go into a full rebuild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanGnome Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 exactly... If they give up their 9th their GM should be fired. Im thinking its their second rounder thats in play. I'd settle for: VAN 2nd (39 OA) T. Hertl B Prospect SJS Bieksa Markstrom 1st (23 OA) It is in effect trading down to get a player later in the rounds, as well as a great young player. SJS keeps their 9th and adds a 23rd OA pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I think they could. Right now, they are in a retool/rebuild, but with core guys like Burns, Thornton, Marleau, and Pavelski getting older, their time to win is now, unless they trade away a few of those guys and go into a full rebuild. But their team couldnt even make the playoffs...they are more than one piece away from being a contender. Getting Bieksa makes them older...i cant see them trading their first rounder in any sort of package. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Markstrom isn’t going to SJ. What reasoning would SJ want with Markstrom? So they could lose him to waivers. Or do they think Stalock/Markstrom combo is going to take them to the cup within their closing window? Sharks need a number one goalie. If Vancouver is sending a goalie to SJ, it’s going to be one that could be there #1 goalie this year. Marsktrom doesn’t really fit that bill, but Lack certainly does. It’s not rocket science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maniwaki Canuck Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 im thinking that the lehner deal was pulled because we will be sending a goalie to sjs with juice. Thats my guess anyways It's the likeliest scenario as of now. Lack >>> Lehner, not only in my biased view but also reputedly in Buffalo's initial priorities, so something must have changed for them to do this. I'd really like some closure on this, though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Time Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 In response to: VAN 2nd (39 OA) T. Hertl SJS Bieksa Markstrom 1st (23 OA) Shawdowngoon, you are insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Would SJ give up their 9th for Bieksa +23rd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaner Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 But their team couldnt even make the playoffs...they are more than one piece away from being a contender. Getting Bieksa makes them older...i cant see them trading their first rounder in any sort of package. But who would they trade for the rumoured package? Lack/Markstrom, Bieksa, and our 23 has enough value to get the 9th overall. If we got the 2nd instead, the other piece would have to be pretty significant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KelownaCanucksFan Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Is there a chance considering San Jose has to win now that they are asking for Miller to and that's what's holding this deal up? Edit: This would free up the cap space for Lucic, I believe Jim Benning wants to have him in Van. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robongo Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 My god, the suspense is killing me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 But who would they trade for the rumoured package? Lack/Markstrom, Bieksa, and our 23 has enough value to get the 9th overall. If we got the 2nd instead, the other piece would have to be pretty significant. I can see them giving up their first if the canucks give up the 23rd in a package.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maniwaki Canuck Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Is there a chance considering San Jose has to win now that they are asking for Miller to and that's what's holding this deal up? We live in hope! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigturk8 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 My god, the suspense is killing me! Yeah, this is killing me. They drop that bomb this morning about waiving for SJ and then silence. Awful awful silence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apples Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Going to miss juice, bleeds blue and green. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 But their team couldnt even make the playoffs...they are more than one piece away from being a contender. Getting Bieksa makes them older...i cant see them trading their first rounder in any sort of package. I agree it would be a bad move on their part. I don't think it's too far fetched if they get their goalie and the 23rd though. More talk about them gunning for Bieksa than a goalie has me wondering now. If they go and spend an 2nd or similar asset on Bieksa what are they hitting the goalie market with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 If it is for San Jose's first, I would think they wait till the draft to announce it. That's usually the way it goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 If it is for San Jose's first, I would think they wait till the draft to announce it. That's usually the way it goes.why? It didnt go that way for lehner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TU90 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Had to turn on 1040 - the sound of Ed Willes was pissing me off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 If it is for San Jose's first, I would think they wait till the draft to announce it. That's usually the way it goes. Yeah if this drags out all day with no trade going down you gotta think we're getting that 9th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.