Junkyard Dog Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Just now, SvenBae said: And where is this deal? Not deal. That's what the Canucks are expecting and the insiders think. Jets want 1st and top prospect for ladd as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 I think Hamhuis himself should get a top prospect and a late 1st. Vrbata should get at least a B prospect or a 2nd himself. That is without retaining significant salary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIBdaQUIB Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Just now, J.R. said: I don't think you understand how this works... Thanks for clarifying. You're awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CeeBee51 Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 2 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: Will everyone who supported him call for his head if he gets fleeced or does t make any trade? Not sure I'll call for his head but I will be VERY disappointed... now if Hammer refuses to waive I might be a little miffed at Hammer instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvenBae Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 1 minute ago, VIC_CITY said: So Hammer + Vrby for Pokka + 55-60th overall pick? No thanks. Then say nothing when we don't get anything. Hammer already said he would want to resign in the summer if he was moved, so what's the big deal? A few months winning a Stanley Cup then returning with that experience would be an asset in itself if that's how it played out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peaches5 Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 3 minutes ago, SvenBae said: Some of you are to lunch. Did you forget the part where these two are rentals? A 1st + a prospect + additional picks like some of you are suggesting is ridiculous. No wonder there was so much undeserved outrage at the Granlund trade. We'd be lucky to get Pokka + 2nd for Hamhuis/Vrbata. You do realize that last year Chicago traded a 2nd +4th for a 40 year old Timonen who hadn't played a single game all year and when he played for Chicago he was awful, right? And then they also gave up a 1st + Dahlbeck for Vermette who was in the doghouse much of his time in Chicago. So yea those offers are nowhere near unreasonable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Just now, DIBdaQUIB said: Thanks for clarifying. You're awesome. They're rentals. Teams generally specifically want to NOT re-sign them. That Hamhuis is unlikely to re-sign with them is not only expected, it's somewhat preferred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 I'll trust TSN when they make an actual trade call - and maybe not even then lol. Is Lalji's source reliable, or is it his TSN dud-buddy, Jason Botchford? I can't exactly say TSN has earned my trust lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIBdaQUIB Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Just now, J.R. said: They're rentals. Teams generally specifically want to NOT re-sign them. That Hamhuis is unlikely to re-sign with them is not only expected, it's somewhat preferred. Which impacts what they are willing to pay for his services for such a short period of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desiboynux4lifee******* Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Just now, wallstreetamigo said: I think Hamhuis himself should get a top prospect and a late 1st. Vrbata should get at least a B prospect or a 2nd himself. That is without retaining significant salary. kings got Sekera for 1st and Roland Mckewon cody franson and Santorelli got a 1st with a b+ prospect either peeople are bored or just trolling, because Hamuis fair value is a 1st rounder and a a to b- prospect Vrbata rite now could get a team to over pay, thats on how Benning shops him. So if the offer is what the media is saying. I would do it in a heart beat because Benning won't know how to trade Vrbata. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Vey, Bartkowski, and a 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Just now, DIBdaQUIB said: Which impacts what they are willing to pay for his services for such a short period of time. No, the market and competition for his services will impact what they're willing to pay. If paying more means their biggest competition like LA, Dallas etc don't get him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Well, this is going to be a ridiculous amount of fun no matter what happens! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 1 minute ago, Hugor Hill said: Vey, Bartkowski, and a 2nd. I see you and raise you a Ballard, Raymond, and a 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvenBae Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 2 minutes ago, peaches5 said: You do realize that last year Chicago traded a 2nd +4th for a 40 year old Timonen who hadn't played a single game all year and when he played for Chicago he was awful, right? And then they also gave up a 1st + Dahlbeck for Vermette who was in the doghouse much of his time in Chicago. So yea those offers are nowhere near unreasonable. I would expect that those trades would have a residual impact on this deadline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanisleryan Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 I think Pokka and a 1st is a good deal for both sides...only issue I see is that Chicago might need to send salary back our way in the shape of Bickell. If this is the case I think Chicago actually needs to add a 2nd or 3rd....since we will lose 4 Mil in cap space next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nergish Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 say this trade goes through today (whatever it may be coming back). Are we still active on deadline day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 uh oh sounds like Chicago is gonna get Ladd. no more need for Vrbata Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peaches5 Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Just now, SvenBae said: I would expect that those trades would have a residual impact on this deadline. Hamhuis is an upgrade over everything they have even if he played the worst hockey of his life. The question I ask is where are the other teams? Are the other contending teams not interested in Hamhuis? I don't blame them but letting Hamhuis become a hawk makes their job significantly more challenging come playoff time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIBdaQUIB Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 2 minutes ago, nergish said: say this trade goes through today (whatever it may be coming back). Are we still active on deadline day? I think Benning would still like to move Prust and Higgins if possible. Don't know about any more roster players though. Edit: Benning did say he was trying to move Vey and Bartkowski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.