Gstank29 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 D who likes to skate and carry the puck, and is an offensively minded, two-way type of defenseman. Would be a good fit with Tanev/Cederholm/Trymakin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Would be a good fit with Tanev/Cederholm/Trymakin Hutton shoots L (as do Ceder/Tryam) so it would likely have to be Tanev given current resources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Hutton/Clendening could be a solid option considering our current prospects, or Subban could be someone who really matches with him. He could also be matched with a Tanev or Corrado to give a more responsible 5 on 5 presence. Cederholm doesn't make much sense, although Tryamkin's style of play (and even Pedan's) as bigger, but good skating defenceman with shots could work. Cederholm isn't as known for his skating or his shot, but would be more of a strictly stay at home type that probably won't have much impact on any sort of offensive pairing at the NHL level. Maybe as a PK type of pair, but again they play the same side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 (edited) Hutton/Clendening could be a solid option considering our current prospects, or Subban could be someone who really matches with him. He could also be matched with a Tanev or Corrado to give a more responsible 5 on 5 presence. Cederholm doesn't make much sense, although Tryamkin's style of play (and even Pedan's) as bigger, but good skating defenceman with shots could work. Cederholm isn't as known for his skating or his shot, but would be more of a strictly stay at home type that probably won't have much impact on any sort of offensive pairing at the NHL level. Maybe as a PK type of pair, but again they play the same side. I hope I'm wrong about Clendening but he strikes me as a Weber replacement (good 6/7, complimentary offensive guy), not an all out top 4 offensive guy. I don't think he has as high of a ceiling as Hutton (hopefully) does (second pair IMO). There's nothing wrong with that but it's not where I hope Hutton gets to. I'd say Subban (offense, offense, offense!) or Tanev (good all around pair)...maybe Corrado would be his most likely partners but that will depend largely on how high Subban can climb. Edited May 28, 2015 by J.R. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 I agree on the limitations for the ceilings of Hutton's potential D partners, but they'd be good options during his development while he gets to his ceiling. And I'd rather that than considering Cederholm as a suitable partner for him to play with at most of the levels they'll both encounter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 I agree on the limitations for the ceilings of Hutton's potential D partners, but they'd be good options during his development while he gets to his ceiling. And I'd rather that than considering Cederholm as a suitable partner for him to play with at most of the levels they'll both encounter. Fair enough What the hell else is there to talk about anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted June 2, 2015 Share Posted June 2, 2015 I'm just wondering, as I haven't seen too much of Ben Hutton, can he be the PMD we need? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted June 2, 2015 Share Posted June 2, 2015 I'm just wondering, as I haven't seen too much of Ben Hutton, can he be the PMD we need? Yes he is the best out of are PMD prospects. Could have a Very high ceiling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted June 2, 2015 Share Posted June 2, 2015 right now any PMD is a good PMD to have lol..our D is so very average so developing our young guys as fast as possible is a good thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 2, 2015 Share Posted June 2, 2015 (edited) Yes he is the best out of are PMD prospects. Could have a Very high ceiling That's debatable. Subban's faster and has more outright offensive skill IMO. McNally's also pretty skilled, has good "battle/compete level" and decently sized. Hutton's got pretty good offensive instincts and good size though. He might be the safest bet as he has possibly the most well rounded package but either of those other guys could win the race. None are by any means sure things though... Then there's whoever we draft this year... Edited June 2, 2015 by J.R. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Says he is 6'3 208 right now. Gosh we could use that kind of size on the backend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Says he is 6'3 208 right now. Gosh we could use that kind of size on the backend Aren't Edler and Hamhuis around that size? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 (edited) Aren't Edler and Hamhuis around that size? Hamhuis is apparently 6'1 208. But Edler is 6'3 215 Edited July 8, 2015 by Gstank29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 (edited) I think he has very good potential to be a top 4 d-man in this league. of all of our prospects, he's the biggest bet in my opinion. Though, like all of our d-prospects, far from a sure thing, but i've always had high hopes for him. Feel he's our most underrated prospect. Edited July 8, 2015 by Supra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saucypass Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 If Hutton had Subban's skills and wheels though... Better yet, Tryamkin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackOut Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 (edited) this guy will be our duncan keith, he's too good Edited July 20, 2015 by BlackOut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nave Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 this guy will be our duncan keith, he's too good That's a bit much... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 He had Werenski and Hanifin-like numbers the last couple of seasons, only problem is he's about 4 years older than those kids. I don't see Hutton as a first pairing defenceman, but depending on how he does in Utica next season, he could fill out to become a nice 2nd pairing left handed defenceman. We still need a future stud top pairing guy on the left side to play ahead of Hutton and Sbisa when Edler gets older though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamJamIam Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 If Hutton had Subban's skills and wheels though... Better yet, Tryamkin... Someone needs to watch the highlights. Hutton scored in his first AHL game. Blasted up the wing alone, scored short side. The number of times he uses a drag move to get past sprawling players and the way he fires across his body from the goal line to the opposite top corner is unbelievable. He's not insanely fast but he does have speed and he can move laterally quite well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saucypass Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 Someone needs to watch the highlights. Hutton scored in his first AHL game. Blasted up the wing alone, scored short side. The number of times he uses a drag move to get past sprawling players and the way he fires across his body from the goal line to the opposite top corner is unbelievable. He's not insanely fast but he does have speed and he can move laterally quite well. Sorry the comment I was trying to make was more to the sentiment that if only Subban had (insert tall player)'s body so he could have their height with his skill set. Which is why I brought up Tryamkin, not that Hutton and Tryamkin had a comparable amount of skill, but because they're both tall players. But yes, I do agree that Hutton is skilled in his own right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now