Zhukini Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 19 minutes ago, Screw said: After Bertuzzi and Kessler I seem to be suffering from douche bag fatigue. I would like to pass on Kane. Funny how those douchebags Including Burrows and Bieksa led us to our most successful years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 No, the board didn't crash because Tanev got traded. Nothing to see here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice orca Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 TSN reported a lot of teams are very interested in Vatenen, i wonder if that will affect the price on Tanev? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 3 minutes ago, ice orca said: TSN reported a lot of teams are very interested in Vatenen, i wonder if that will affect the price on Tanev? I mean, a better defenseman will net a better return. So, probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Screw Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 21 hours ago, Zhukini said: Funny how those douchebags Including Burrows and Bieksa led us to our most successful years. Funny how their egos/selfish choices worked to quickly derail those years as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 48 minutes ago, ice orca said: TSN reported a lot of teams are very interested in Vatenen, i wonder if that will affect the price on Tanev? I dont think it will affect the price of Tanev. Vatenen is the superior player (skills, age, contract) and will command more and definitely get more attention from other GMs. While Tanev is a very good dman his value to Vancouver is far greater than any asset they will acquire in a trade and there will be quite a shock from a lot of people here when/if he is traded due to the real return as opposed to most of the fantasy proposals where we fleece the opposing GM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 1 hour ago, Monty said: No, the board didn't crash because Tanev got traded. Nothing to see here. LOL! I dont think the boards will crash if that happens.. People's expectations though..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 4 minutes ago, Ronaldoescobar said: LOL! I dont think the boards will crash if that happens.. People's expectations though..... Crashed when luwas traded. Crashed when kes was traded. Crashed when Schneider was traded. Crashed when lu was pulled from practice to announce he wasnt teaded ffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camel Toe Drag Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 17 minutes ago, Ronaldoescobar said: I dont think it will affect the price of Tanev. Vatenen is the superior player (skills, age, contract) and will command more and definitely get more attention from other GMs. While Tanev is a very good dman his value to Vancouver is far greater than any asset they will acquire in a trade and there will be quite a shock from a lot of people here when/if he is traded due to the real return as opposed to most of the fantasy proposals where we fleece the opposing GM. Plus they aren't even comparable. They both play very different styles and bring their own separate strengths to the table. It really depends what gm's are looking for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonoman Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 21 hours ago, Zhukini said: Funny how those douchebags Including Burrows and Bieksa led us to our most successful years. Funny, I can't recall reading any stories about Burrows or Bieksa in trouble with the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 9 minutes ago, Camel Toe Drag said: Plus they aren't even comparable. They both play very different styles and bring their own separate strengths to the table. It really depends what gm's are looking for. Very true! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhukini Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 3 minutes ago, sonoman said: Funny, I can't recall reading any stories about Burrows or Bieksa in trouble with the law. And when was Kesler in trouble with the law? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3aL Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 Looking forward to this trade just finishing so we know if we are gonna have another top draft pick or nottttt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuporbust Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 2 hours ago, Screw said: Funny how their egos/selfish choices worked to quickly derail those years as well. We were a 100 point team for the better part of a decade. 8 full seasons over a 100 points actually. We had a long run. Not sure what u mean by a quick derail man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHockeyNerds Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 Vancouver is probably looks at something close to a hall return for Tanev! Obviously won't get a player of the caliber but there asking price will be about in that range Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10pavelbure96 Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 3 hours ago, Monty said: I mean, a better defenseman will net a better return. So, probably. Are you saying Tanev is better than vatanen? Chris is big time over rated on these boards, yes he's consistent and steadfast but even the best defensive defensemen have a deadly clapper or can at least play physical. Tanev is GREAT at what he does and would be a welcome addition to any team but he is as one dimensional as it gets. And unreasonable expectations is why there are so many doom and gloomers around here. Expectations breed disappointment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 4 minutes ago, 10pavelbure96 said: Are you saying Tanev is better than vatanen? No. No I am not saying that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RakuRaku Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 I just wish that Tanev could pop in a few goals so we won't even have to discuss on so many pages about trade discussion!! Coz we'll either keep him for good or consider some really attractive trade offers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 3 hours ago, ice orca said: TSN reported a lot of teams are very interested in Vatenen, i wonder if that will affect the price on Tanev? Difference being that we don't have to move Tanev. ANA needs to move a D. They'll likely get less than Vatanan's worth and we might get more than Tanev is. Would not be shocked if the values are pretty darn close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 22 minutes ago, J.R. said: Difference being that we don't have to move Tanev. ANA needs to move a D. They'll likely get less than Vatanan's worth and we might get more than Tanev is. Would not be shocked if the values are pretty darn close. Yup. In fact, would not surprise me if Tanev nets more, because Vatanen will be dealt prior to the expansion draft. Tanev will almost certainly be moved after it, when the value is much higher, and more GMs suddenly have holes on their blueline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.