Me_ Posted April 23, 2021 Share Posted April 23, 2021 12 hours ago, morrissex95 said: It's "Hamonic" not "Harmonic" you've got it wrong in your sig as well Why did I see an R all this time??????? Thanks bud 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 18 hours ago, Elias Pettersson said: Zadorov Tryamkin would be the scariest defensive partnership in the NHL. Whichever side the forward chooses he's going to end up in the training room, or worse... They would also be kinda easy to skate around... also screen their own goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNucks1 Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 (edited) On 4/22/2021 at 1:10 PM, runtzguy said: Let Seattle take Myers, trade Zadorov for Virtanen and (someone), sign Tryamkin and Edler. Defence fixed. not really sure how downgrading on Defence makes it fixed. EDIT: i like zadorov, wonder what there asking but, who are we exposing on D we would have to protect him but i'd rather keep myers. Edited April 24, 2021 by TNucks1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 I'd consider a 1 for 1 trade Jake for Zadorov. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted April 25, 2021 Share Posted April 25, 2021 (edited) On 4/23/2021 at 5:54 PM, TNucks1 said: not really sure how downgrading on Defence makes it fixed. EDIT: i like zadorov, wonder what there asking but, who are we exposing on D we would have to protect him but i'd rather keep myers. Zadorov is better, younger, and cheaper than Myers.... it would be nuts to not make moves that would result swapping out Myers for Zadorov. He is a legit #3D and still young enough that he could keep getting better. He was coming off arm surgery before this season so was probably a little behind with his preparation. Even at his worst he was a solid top 4 guy. You can protect Schmidt, Zadorov, and either Juolevi or Myers. If Juolevi gets picked up, then you trade one of Schmidt or Myers after expansion to teams needing to replace top 4D they lost. Our D looks pretty solid with: Hughes-Hamonic Zadorov-Schmidt Edler-Tryamkin Juolevi-Bowie or: Hughes-Hamonic Zadorov-Tryamkin Edler-Myers Juolevi-Bowie Edited April 25, 2021 by Provost 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted April 25, 2021 Share Posted April 25, 2021 12 hours ago, BPA said: I'd consider a 1 for 1 trade Jake for Zadorov. Yeah, this is why you're not a GM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted April 26, 2021 Author Share Posted April 26, 2021 On 4/24/2021 at 9:49 AM, BPA said: I'd consider a 1 for 1 trade Jake for Zadorov. .. even add Bowie to that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 27 minutes ago, SilentSam said: .. even add Bowie to that I would add Juolevi to that... if we added Zadorov it probably pushes Juolevi off the protection list anyways (assuming Benning isn't planning on exposing Myers). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 6 minutes ago, Provost said: I would add Juolevi to that... if we added Zadorov it probably pushes Juolevi off the protection list anyways (assuming Benning isn't planning on exposing Myers). I wouldn't add OJ. No need. Pretty sure Holtby would be selected in the expansion draft considering his recent resurgence of stellar goaltending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted April 26, 2021 Author Share Posted April 26, 2021 Just now, Provost said: I would add Juolevi to that... if we added Zadorov it probably pushes Juolevi off the protection list anyways (assuming Benning isn't planning on exposing Myers). That starts a pretty good conversation , A seasoned 26 yr old Zadorov over a rookie 24 yr old Joulevi. yes.. we have enough skill in Hughes and Rathbone .. and Schmidt.. you know what would almost secure letting Joulevi go? I think the first 3 picks in the draft are stacking as D men, this should be our year for the draft lottery #1. Owen powers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 (edited) 18 minutes ago, BPA said: I wouldn't add OJ. No need. Pretty sure Holtby would be selected in the expansion draft considering his recent resurgence of stellar goaltending. Zadorov is an established 2nd pairing D with size who as a shut down guy is still doubling Virtanen’s offensive contribution this year. Virtanen maxed out as a 3rd line winger on an expensive contract for his production and not even 4th like level this year. Those things don’t have the same value, not even remotely. Adding Juolevi realistically doesn’t get it done compared with other offers that would be out there. Edited April 26, 2021 by Provost 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 1 hour ago, Provost said: Zadorov is an established 2nd pairing D with size who as a shut down guy is still doubling Virtanen’s offensive contribution this year. Virtanen maxed out as a 3rd line winger on an expensive contract for his production and not even 4th like level this year. Those things don’t have the same value, not even remotely. Adding Juolevi realistically doesn’t get it done compared with other offers that would be out there. Chances are, if they were to move ED eligible Zadorov, they'd want a non eligible guy back. Are we prepared to give up Rathbone (or Woo)? I'm not so sure about that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 1 minute ago, aGENT said: Chances are, if they were to move ED eligible Zadorov, they'd want a non eligible guy back. Are we prepared to give up Rathbone (or Woo)? I'm not so sure about that... I agree they would likely want a non eligible guy back. I would do Woo but not Rathbone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad_BOI_pete Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 1 hour ago, Provost said: Zadorov is an established 2nd pairing D with size who as a shut down guy is still doubling Virtanen’s offensive contribution this year. Virtanen maxed out as a 3rd line winger on an expensive contract for his production and not even 4th like level this year. Those things don’t have the same value, not even remotely. Adding Juolevi realistically doesn’t get it done compared with other offers that would be out there. is he established though? over the last 3 seasons benn was 9 spots lower than him in toi. benn outscored him on much less offensive teams in 30 fewer games. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 Virtanen straight up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 13 hours ago, Petey_BOI said: is he established though? over the last 3 seasons benn was 9 spots lower than him in toi. benn outscored him on much less offensive teams in 30 fewer games. Yeah, I don't agree about Zad being a 2nd pairing guy. I certainly don't think he or Tryamkin are better than Myers. Zad will require +3.5 cap hit. Include that $ along with increase for Hamonic, $ for Tryamkin, $1m for Juolevi. Add that to the +18m for Hughes, Schmidt and Myers, the team D is pricey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 On 4/26/2021 at 10:27 AM, higgyfan said: Yeah, I don't agree about Zad being a 2nd pairing guy. I certainly don't think he or Tryamkin are better than Myers. Zad will require +3.5 cap hit. Include that $ along with increase for Hamonic, $ for Tryamkin, $1m for Juolevi. Add that to the +18m for Hughes, Schmidt and Myers, the team D is pricey. 6 D-men play as much as 12 forwards, so it can make sense to have a fair amount of your cap tied into your D. Agreed on Zadorov... Chicago had high hopes for him (although their entire team isn't really that great), but he's more of a 3rd pairing guy on a good team. Not sure why everyone underestimates Myers, maybe because of his contract? He's been our best d-man this year, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Canuck #12 Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 Do we want Zadorov, or should be just resign Schenn? Watching this makes me think maybe the latter: Schenn is, after all, the only RHD of the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 Zadorov isn't gonna get more than 3.2 from the Hawks and I doubt Seattle would pick him. He's a good 5th D at best. I'd trade Virtanen and his 2.55M for Zadorov if he agreed to sign a 1-2 year deal at 3.2M. Both players could use a change in scenery. Only way I do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted April 28, 2021 Author Share Posted April 28, 2021 11 hours ago, Captain Canuck #12 said: Do we want Zadorov, or should be just resign Schenn? Watching this makes me think maybe the latter: Schenn is, after all, the only RHD of the two. Why didn’t Schenn get tossed? Totally. at the moment he dropped the gloves . Then he picks his gloves up for a bad puck drop.. referees couldn’t put a match out in the pouring rain in this league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts