Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Rumour] J.T. Miller Trade/Contract Talks


Podzilla

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Gator said:

Doubt anyone signs Miller for $10M+.. Did you see that Hertl contract? :lol:

Yes and it is a terrible contract.  Doesn't surprise me coming from the Sharks.

How exactly do you think the Canucks can pay that kind of salary to Miller?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, higgyfan said:

Yes and it is a terrible contract.  Doesn't surprise me coming from the Sharks.

How exactly do you think the Canucks can pay that kind of salary to Miller?

Same way any other team does. By signing the dotted line :picard:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gator said:

Well if we cant resign him, why keep him? :picard:

Going into next season, the Nucks have about $15m to replace or re-sign 10 players

plus Boeser.  The following season it will be Bo,Hogs and Miller's $10+.  :picard:

 

I think the management could see long before the TD that Millsy wasn't going to get the huge

trade return they wanted.  Probably giving themselves time to develop a trade in the offseason,

or during the next season. 

 

Do 'we' even know if he wants to stay in Vancouver?  A passionate player like Miller seems like

a guy that would want to go to a contender and win a Stanley Cup.

 

 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, higgyfan said:

Do 'we' even know if he wants to stay in Vancouver?  A passionate player like Miller seems like

a guy that would want to go to a contender and win a Stanley Cup.

At least this way in the offseason they can see what an extension for Miller would look like. 

 

Once that is discussed between the two parties and a rough number/term is known they can then either sign him or move him. I can see what you're saying and he may not even want to stay in Van after this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

No, he had Hamonic on one side and two players on the other. 
That is more savings what he showed.

 

with Motte in the picture it’s two versus two. 

Before Motte was traded, we moved out Hamonic and brought in Dermott and Richardson... I think one of us is terrible at math, but it's not me lol

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

No, he had Hamonic on one side and two players on the other. 
That is more savings what he showed.

 

with Motte in the picture it’s two versus two. 

Yes, we added Dermott and Richardson.. so he was correct that we only were ahead $700k... At the time

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JayDangles said:

Yes, we added Dermott and Richardson.. so he was correct that we only were ahead $700k... At the time

Nah, thats two players. 
Adding Richardsson means someone either gets traded or in Abbotsford. 
In this case it was Motte and more than 400k added.

Somethings got to give and Hamonic could only be in the same column as a D.

But it’s just semantics anyway… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...