MrCanuck94 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 (edited) To Pit: Boeser Motte Poolman To Van: Marino Kapanen Teams fill each others needs and we cut ties with Poolman with Hamonic on the third pair. Pitts gets Poolman as support on the bottom pair to somewhat make up for the loss of Marino. We get Kapanen who has produced better than Boeser 5on5 while adding a lot to our team speed. Lockwood has shown that he is close to NHL ready and has a similar play style to Motte. *Barring other moves* Kapanen Miller Pod Hog Petey Garland Pearson Horvat Dickinson Highmore Lammikko Lockwood Hughes Marino OEL Myers Rathbone Hamonic Demko Halak Edited March 14, 2022 by MrCanuck94 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eeeeergh Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 23 minutes ago, MrCanuck94 said: To Pit: Boeser Motte Poolman To Van: Marino Kapanen Teams fill each others needs and we cut ties with Poolman with Hamonic on the third pair. Pitts gets Poolman as support on the bottom pair to somewhat make up for the loss of Marino. We get Kapanen who has produced better than Boeser 5on5 while adding a lot to our team speed. Lockwood has shown that he is close to NHL ready and has a similar play style to Motte. *Barring other moves* Kapanen Miller Pod Hog Petey Garland Pearson Horvat Dickinson Highmore Lammikko Lockwood Hughes Marino OEL Myers Rathbone Hamonic Demko Halak Good deal for both teams, would do it absolutely 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nameci Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Well done! A realistic proposal which benefits both teams. I’m in! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Not too bad. I'm just not sure about Marino. In this case we definitely lose the more proven player in Brock - and can say better teams their players always look better which is a tad worrisome. That said we need RHD's .... tough one. Who knows who ends up the winner in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcam Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 7 hours ago, MrCanuck94 said: To Pit: Boeser Motte Poolman To Van: Marino Kapanen Teams fill each others needs and we cut ties with Poolman with Hamonic on the third pair. Pitts gets Poolman as support on the bottom pair to somewhat make up for the loss of Marino. We get Kapanen who has produced better than Boeser 5on5 while adding a lot to our team speed. Lockwood has shown that he is close to NHL ready and has a similar play style to Motte. *Barring other moves* Kapanen Miller Pod Hog Petey Garland Pearson Horvat Dickinson Highmore Lammikko Lockwood Hughes Marino OEL Myers Rathbone Hamonic Demko Halak Kapanen 25, 6'1 RW last 4 seasons have be leaving questions about him.. 2021-22 - GP 58 -- G 9 -- PTS 26 2020-21 - GP 40 --G 11 --PTS 30 2019-20--GP 69--G 13 -- PTS 36 2018-19 -GP 78 --G 20 --PTS 44 Not really interested in Kapanen 3.2 million RFA this summer.. He should be a 25 goal guy and 58--65 points I would want more then Marino 23 for Boeser 25.. Garland -Pitts -- Van -Marino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrCanuck94 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 2 hours ago, wildcam said: Kapanen 25, 6'1 RW last 4 seasons have be leaving questions about him.. 2021-22 - GP 58 -- G 9 -- PTS 26 2020-21 - GP 40 --G 11 --PTS 30 2019-20--GP 69--G 13 -- PTS 36 2018-19 -GP 78 --G 20 --PTS 44 Not really interested in Kapanen 3.2 million RFA this summer.. He should be a 25 goal guy and 58--65 points I would want more then Marino 23 for Boeser 25.. Garland -Pitts -- Van -Marino Shedding Poolman's salary is value as well in this circumstance. Kapanen's even strength points last 4 seasons - 39, 31, 26, 22 (so far) Boeser's even strength points last 4 seasons - 41, 31, 34, 18 (so far) Production isn't a huge drop off and we can move Garland to PP1, where he belongs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 No sense for Penguins to take a 2.5M RD Poolman when there’s Schenn right there or UFA. No deal probably gets done during the season. Losing Marino creates a hole in the top 4. They need dominos to fall in the off-season more likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby James Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 Fair deal I think. I actually feel Vancouver could remove Motte from the offer though. Boeser and Poolman for Marino and Kap They upgrade massively on the forward end while downgrading a bit on the Defense side. Canucks gets a decent top 4 RHD signed for a while and clear a little cap (although Poolman isn't too concerning to me cap wise). If Pitts want a different D they can also choose Hamonic instead. Slightly more expensive, but better and only signed for 2 years. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 good bones of a trade. I would do this but I doubt Pittsburgh moves marino during the season. kapanen supposedly is very fast and has a good two way game and plays on pk so he is like motte with more offence, a guy that can play up and down the line up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 motte to Carolina for Scott morrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 On 3/14/2022 at 8:41 AM, wildcam said: Kapanen 25, 6'1 RW last 4 seasons have be leaving questions about him.. 2021-22 - GP 58 -- G 9 -- PTS 26 2020-21 - GP 40 --G 11 --PTS 30 2019-20--GP 69--G 13 -- PTS 36 2018-19 -GP 78 --G 20 --PTS 44 Not really interested in Kapanen 3.2 million RFA this summer.. He should be a 25 goal guy and 58--65 points I would want more then Marino 23 for Boeser 25.. Garland -Pitts -- Van -Marino Why do you value Garland less than you do Brock? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 That seems like a reasonable deal... and there are reports that Pittsburgh is interested in Boeser. If Boston is still interested in Garland, you could trade him and Dickenson for Debrusk and Senyshyn and end up with a better lineup overall along with a bunch of cap savings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 Honestly I think the Penguins are the most likely trade partners with us due to their desire to snag Boeser and JR's ties. I don't particularly want it to happen but I could see a trade revolving around Boeser for Marino take place. I wouldn't want it to happen - Marino isn't the top shutdown righty we need, he's a smaller puck mover so he wouldn't gel well with Hughes, and if we're trading a top young forward we should look to get a strong tough right defenceman who's young. Pierre-Oliver Joseph is interesting, big strong left defenceman, former 1st rounder and a lefty who could slowly take some bottom pairing minutes and slowly steal minutes from OEL over time. He's got a lot more potential than Marino. I'd love a Boeser for POJ deal but cap-wise they'd have to send a lot more our way, maybe throw in Kapanen but that still wouldn't cut it. Is there a Boeser + Motte + Rathbone for POJ + Marino + Kapanen deal out there to be made? I'd rather sit pat, don't like any of their young defenceman as much as some other guys around the league (eg. Schneider) and I just know Boeser ends up a 30+ goal scorer in their top 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Ward Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 All this talk about moving Boeser or Garland. I see it this way. Boeser is younger, bigger, and has averaged .79 ppg in his young career. He is owed 7.5 million next year. Garland has averaged .59 ppg but has a bigger heart and is on an excellent contract. Garland is exactly the type of player, on exactly the type of contract we want. If Boeser would sign for 5.25 or less then it might be a toss up which player to move, but with the salaries taken into account, it has to be Boeser. Plus he will also fetch a bigger return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now