[Proposal] How about Boeser for Lafreniere?

[Canuckfanforlife82]

Lafrieniere is a healthy scratch today. He's been demoted to the fourth line. Would anyone else be open to this?

[BlakeQuinnAndEggs]

3 minutes ago, Canuckfanforlife82 said:

Lafrieniere is a healthy scratch today. He's been demoted to the fourth line. Would anyone else be open to this?

NYR wouldn't do that, we would have to add.

 

I still think Alexis will eventually break out as a late bloomer, I'd love to rip off the rags, but I doubt it

[Warhippy]

How about....putting this in a trade thread  

[garthsbutcher]

8 minutes ago, Canuckfanforlife82 said:

Lafrieniere is a healthy scratch today. He's been demoted to the fourth line. Would anyone else be open to this?

Yes everyone but the Rangers

[-Vintage Canuck-]

 

Note: Tags are mandatory only in the Trades, Rumours, Signings forum and in the Proposals and Armchair GM'ing forum.

[Alflives]

Cap allocation aside, this is a great trade.  We’d have to take a cap dumperoo with the Laugher though. 

[jdubman]

In a heartbeat! Make it happen JR!!

[Ghostsof1915]

AF is on the last year of his entry level deal. Maybe Hogs, Lockwood, and Rathbone. See if the Rags bite? Or just hang up the phone and laugh.

[Ruthervin]

37 minutes ago, Canuckfanforlife82 said:

Lafrieniere is a healthy scratch today. He's been demoted to the fourth line. Would anyone else be open to this?

Rangers will look for someone better than Boeser.

[Devron]

Yeah if it includes a 1st and a D prospect

 

Edit: I just assumed this was a Horvat proposal lol. Boeser for Laff without a doubt 

Edited December 29, 2022 by Devron
See

[higgyfan]

I'd do it in a heartbeat, but doubt the Rangers would.  Even add to the trade, the Rangers are tight to the

cap and all their higher salaries have long terms.  Nucks would have to retain salary, to make it happen, 

which I don't think they want to do.

 

Now if you trade Kuze + Shenn + high pick or decent prospect, you might be able to snag Laffy+ Schneids

 

They sure are desperate for a top 6rw though. Garland would be the #1rw on that team.

 

[Nucksfollower1983]

Tiger Woods, but I wont.

 

Spoiler

just kidding, I woods

 

[Nucker 67]

I wouldn't even need to consider this, it's a done deal!  But I don't think NYR give up on him for Boeser. 

 

They probably wouldn't mind getting Kuzmenko, though. Cheap cap hit, point-a-game player who hasn't even entered his prime yet. But in that case, they might as well try to get Schneider. 

 

Boeser and Schenn for Schneider. 

 

Schenn re-signs in VAN next year. 

 

 

 

 

[JayDangles]

Besides the fact that Boeser has next to zero trade value, as already stated above, the numbers dont work.

 

and the Rags don't even have anyone on their team who could be considered a cap dump in order to offset the salaries.

 

Rangers simply aren't going to be a trading partner for us unless its Horvat going the other way.

 Teams dont see Boeser from 3 years ago, they see Boeser now. His performance at both ends of the ice leaves a lot to be desired, and his contract is scarier in a tight cap world.

Boeser doesn't move without us having to add a high pick, or we take back an inferior player and are willing to lose the trade on the ice, but win it in salary offload.

 

[qwijibo]

44 minutes ago, Ruthervin said:

Rangers will look for someone better than Boeser.

Not to mention the $5.5m cap difference 

[Nucksfollower1983]

side note, you gotta love how the rangers have a 1st and 2nd overall pick that havent lived up to the expectations

[garthsbutcher]

6 minutes ago, Nucksfollower1983 said:

side note, you gotta love how the rangers have a 1st and 2nd overall pick that havent lived up to the expectations

And yet are still better than us

[Elias Pettersson]

I’d do Horvat and Schenn for Lafreniere, Schneider and a 2023 1st round pick. 

[JayDangles]

12 minutes ago, Nucksfollower1983 said:

side note, you gotta love how the rangers have a 1st and 2nd overall pick that havent lived up to the expectations

Canucks see that 1st and second, and raise them 3 firsts (Mccan, Virtannen, Oulevi) and two seconds (Kole Lind, Jonah Gadjovich) All players we drafted and have nothing to show for it.

Can argue that Mccan turned into Pearson but it would be a weak argument.

[Nucksfollower1983]

6 minutes ago, JayDangles said:

Canucks see that 1st and second, and raise them 3 firsts (Mccan, Virtannen, Oulevi) and two seconds (Kole Lind, Jonah Gadjovich) All players we drafted and have nothing to show for it.

Can argue that Mccan turned into Pearson but it would be a weak argument.

none of those players were 1st and 2nd overall picks and ya might as well throw 2 2nd round picks in there because that's a relevant comparison too right?

Edited December 29, 2022 by Nucksfollower1983