• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

playboi19

[Rumour] Philadelpia Flyers have Inquired about Alexander Edler

Recommended Posts

they can inquire all they want, in fact most teams inquire about most players, doesn't mean the door is open for negotiations without significant overpayment (which is what philly would need to do to remove Edler from Vancouver)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If anything it's just an inquiry....I doubt anything becomes of it.

The Canucks need Edler for their top 4 just as much as PHI needs another top 4 dman.

I'd be more interested in giving them Ballard for Read or Wellwood+

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a ton of teams who still need top 4 D men... since we didn't keep Salo, get Weber or even sign that college UFA dude, then we don't have any spare to give away. We basically switched out Salo for Garrison (yet to see if that is better or worse).

On the other hand, it won't be too far into the season that we will be getting serious enquiries about Ballard who is now on a contract that looks pretty darn good. He is much more suited to a top 4 role than a bottom pairing, and I am sure he will be able to excel again in another system where he sees the ice more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL Flyers aren't that stupid. Raymond has no Value, Coburn has the same as Edler and Voracek is a 1st line winger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there talk that Edler won't re-sign, or that the Canucks won't be able to offer him enough money?

(I didn't follow the Canucks too well this season)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to phi: edler, raymond,

to van: couturier, grossman

would you???

any deal involving philly and edler, it has to involve couturier

sedin-sedin-burrows

higgins-kesler-booth

kassian-couturier-hansen

malhotra-lapierre-pinizzotto

hamhuis-bieksa

grossman-garrison

ballard-tanev

couturier can play wing also....but the mobility on our blueline takes a shot to the gut

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If garrison ends up being solid as a rock and we get points out of either Bieksa or hamhuis, why not think about it mid season?

I love edler but if we can get schenn or couturier + out of them and other guys are stepping up this could be a good move for the future.

use luongo to fetch a top 4 dman and use eddy to fetch a highly toughted prospect that u cant get in the luongo deal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. Not looking to move Edler - at all - so imo It would take a proven young blueliner and Couturier to get it done - and all their young proven guys - Grossman, Meszaros, and Coburn - are left handed shots, don't have as much scoring punch as Edler, and therefore not going to match up with Garrison nearly as well as Edler will... but if they are willing to overpay and send Couturier with one of those guys, perhaps... or if the Canucks could sweeten a deal with Florida and land Gudbranson in a Lu deal, perhaps then a pair of forwards as proposed above would make sense.

Or include Lu in a monster deal and let them figure out what to do with Bryz (to Toronto...?)

Lu and Edler

Couturier, Simmonds/Vorachek, one of the young blueliners mentioned above, 1st.

realistically - with Doan undecided, Lu still here, and the CBA ongoing, it's hard to determine what the Canucks would want in return at this point.

And regarding the inquiry above whether Edler has expressed reluctance to re-sign or if the price is too high, there haven't been any rumblings to those effects.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are just inquiring about how hard he will hit Hartnell next time they meet.................given how easily Hartnell falls down they will want to be prepared.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who would consider this seriously?

For a team that is looked to as a contender, Philly's D is in shambles. Timonen is really their only legitimate top-pairing has been great, but he is 37, and if he takes a step back (reasonable to assume that he will), they're really screwed.

Coburn, Meszaros, and Grossmann are all solid 2nd pairing guys, but none of them are at Edler's level - heck, none of them are at Hamhuis and Bieksa's level either. If we could get one of them in return for Edler, in addition to a young stud top-6 forward (Couturier and Schenn are unrealistic, but Voracek, Simmonds, or Read may be doable), we may be in a better position.

I think we'd be a better team with Voracek/Simmonds/Read and Coburn/Meszaros/Grossmann than we are with Edler, simply because we have a wealth of D-men but a lack of depth in scoring forwards. But I think Philly would be a better team with Edler, because they need a top pairing offensive D-man more than they need young forwards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.