Blueberries Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 MDZ + Richards to WPG for Kane and a 2nd. That will never happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bookie Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 I picture a family function for Eklund being him in the bathtub surrounded by all his named rubber duckies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 That will never happen. Why not? You're going to have to contribute to the discussion with more than opinion. Richards has been talked about as possible buyout at seasons end, A trade would be better obviously. Kane coming back even better. Winnipeg desperately needs top centers. Brad Richards could be that key piece. MDZ is a delightful throw in and the Blue Shirts get that sweet solid winger they need or want for their top 6. Added Kane's ego would be well received in New York Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 man this guy is terrible! a possible deal between 2 hockey teams may go down within now and the trade deadline Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck or Die Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 NEWSFLASH: A team may or may not make a deal!!!!! You heard it here first, folks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mollyworld Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Possible destinations. MDZ to Edm for OMark and a 2nd MDZ + Richards to WPG for Kane and a 2nd. Most likely scenario Eklund is a gossip columnist that is to hockey what Star is to entertainment Edmonton laughs at that deal, Winterpeg laughs heartily at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 NEWSFLASH: A team may or may not make a deal!!!!! You heard it here first, folks! This is earth shattering information Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragon4401 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Edmonton DZ Brassard Richards(30% cap retain) 1st NYR Eberle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Canucks may have made a deal....oh my, so exciting *yawn* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 They should re-sign Girardi first, before dealing away DZ. Honestly, the Rags have forwards to pawn off first. Lundy clearly needs all the defensive help he can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Eklund's family function. "Can't you just watch football like everyone else????" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaNuCkSLoUiE23 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Maybe to WSH for Orlov? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Edmonton laughs at that deal, Winterpeg laughs heartily at it. Why? Actually present an argument against it. Here are some FACTS Reports are that Omark wants out of the Edmonton system and is debating a move back to Europe with a bird to Edmonton on the way out the door. Edmonton needs defensemen. MDZ is a defenseman. A 2nd round pick isn't really much in a shallow draft. So you base this off of what? The Rangers need a solid franchise winger to play behind or beside Nash. The Jets desperately need a #1 center and a shoring up of the defense while Trouba rounds into form. The Rangers are also on record as apparently wanting to have bought out Richards last off season or even this off season. It fits. So please oh wise one, tell me why in your mind this gets laughed at? And don't forget to show your work and not just smarmy nothing comments. Or they might get laughed at Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragon4401 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Van Callahan Brassard NYR Burrows Edler Sedin-Sedin-Callahan Higgins-Kesler-Santo Booth-Brassard-Kassian Sestito-Richardson-Weise The Rags get 2 players that thrived under AV and the Sedin's get a top line RW to play alongside them while Brassard adds depth to the 3rd line and could move to the 2nd line wing if was needed to and the Rags can trade DZ to Edmonton or Winnipeg for an offensive pushback to counter losses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xbox Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 They should re-sign Girardi first, before dealing away DZ. Honestly, the Rags have forwards to pawn off first. Lundy clearly needs all the defensive help he can get. Trading away MDZ should help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Winnipeg makes more sense than Edmonton. Maybe Del Zotto+++ for Kane? A Defence going to WPG actually makes zero sense. Seriously why would WPG even consider trading kane away unless it's going to replace the glaring offence from the loss of subtracting kane in their line up. Would we trade both sedins for a Dman? Would we trade Kesler for a goalie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Maybe Sather got mad at AV for the disappointing season and made seperate deals to acquire Ballard, Hodgson and Shirokov? Funny, I'd suggested the same thing coupla' days back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayRayDown Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Why? Actually present an argument against it. Here are some FACTS Reports are that Omark wants out of the Edmonton system and is debating a move back to Europe with a bird to Edmonton on the way out the door. Edmonton needs defensemen. MDZ is a defenseman. A 2nd round pick isn't really much in a shallow draft. So you base this off of what? The Rangers need a solid franchise winger to play behind or beside Nash. The Jets desperately need a #1 center and a shoring up of the defense while Trouba rounds into form. The Rangers are also on record as apparently wanting to have bought out Richards last off season or even this off season. It fits. So please oh wise one, tell me why in your mind this gets laughed at? And don't forget to show your work and not just smarmy nothing comments. Or they might get laughed at 1) WPG doesn't have the cap 2) Richard's contract is as bad as Luongo's. Has little to no trade value if they haven't been able to get ride of him yet. 3) Why trade for Richards when he will be a UFA if they buy him out at the end of the year. 4)It'll take about Del zotto+++ for Kane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topbananas Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 he's at his older brothers 12th birthday party Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GB5 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 So the most recet headlines from Eklund in recent weeks include: - Rumors of Rangers Deal. - Rumors, Blues, Flyers, Rangers, Jets, Bruins, Canucks, Flames, Kings, Isles, + - Couturier Value on the Rise...Edmonton interest continues... - Caps want Edler. Some info on Habs and Avs. The Habs Are Targeting: - Banged Up Bluelines - Gleason Trade Discussions Heating Up - Habs/Avalanche Talks "Something Major." Del Zotto, Gleason, Kings/Sabres... Anyway, the point being that none of these deals have happened, nor have any other ones that Eklund "breaks". As said before, Eklund's rumors should be posted in the "Armchair GM" forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.