CaptainCanuck001 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 I'm more upset at losing the 2nd more so than McCann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Just now, Fanuck said: Meaning they're taking a center (PLD) at the draft? Ew. Shink, Tkachuk, , 2nd McCann>>>>> Granplug, Dubust, Gudbranson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Should've kept that second.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 46 minutes ago, King Heffy said: This year's second? Fire this idiot. NOW. Odds we get a defenseman as good as Gudbranson with the 2nd round pick are about 5-10%... But continue overreacting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShakyWalton Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 McCann was going to play in Utica probably or traded somewhere else...not really any room for him right now and Gudbranson is a big guy and what we need..so we lose that 2nd round pick which probably would have been a D man anyway who wouldnt be ready....that means its almost a given we take Dubois or Tkachuk ...not a bad trade in my books...the only thing I dont like is a chance at Benson with the 2nd pick...maybe some more trades coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintPatrick33 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 ummmmm ok.... Gudbrandson cant skate, and we give up McCann plus a 2nd??? Damn JB you better make it up by drafting some good players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyCanuck7 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 You could tell by the way Jim Benning talked about him. Like in interviews he always said that McCann had a "chance" to be apart of the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANUCK-EXPRESS Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Just now, CaptainCanuck001 said: I'm more upset at losing the 2nd more so than McCann Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Uhh....Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwags Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Wasn't expecting this. Gudbranson brings something to the table. I don't like that 2nd, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Whew. i thought Friedman said our first rounder was involved. Okay (inhale exhale) I guess this is alright. I don't like it much though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks1219 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 This trade is hilarious. The 33rd pick too? Hahaha. Alright, back to hibernation for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We_Are_All_Canucks_4_life Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 1 minute ago, Mike Vanderhoek said: I figured he had more value, but then again I am on CDC and have likely fallen victim to overvaluing Canucks players.......guilty. well in my opinion mccann would need to be in the top 6 to be effective and no way he makes that place in the nhl this year barring injuries, while gudbranson could slot right in on our defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Stammer- Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 I really hope that trading that 2nd doesn't come to bite us in the rectal region Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 3 minutes ago, CANUCK-EXPRESS said: This years second... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Gudbranson = Sbisa. Just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyCanuck7 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Well now we have to many Dman. Let Hamhuis walk at free agency or a trade coming up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DollarAndADream Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Trade should have gone through without the 2nd, but sometimes you have to pay, I suppose. We'll see how this pans out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWMc1 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Seems like a high price, but we solidify the right side of our defence. McCann fans are going to hate this, but I think this kind of a d-man is just what the doctor ordered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 This means Hamhuis is gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.