nickels555 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Just wondering who viewers felt would return the most in a trade. I don't feel the loss of any of the 3 would make that discernible difference in next years team. It would be great to free up the 15 million to continue with the retool. I personally, don't feel any of them would garner much interest with their current contracts. Acquiring a 2nd round draft pick, and freeing up the money would be a huge win IMO. Interested in others thoughts.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBackup Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Miller. I'd like to see Juice and Burr retire as Canucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HC20.0 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Probably Miller. People wouldn't want Burr's caphit, and Juice isn't going anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Bieksa. Teams need a good Dman, and Bieksa is a UFA next year. But I'd like to see Juice and Burr retire as Canucks. too, so I'm kind of torn between Miller and Bieksa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 millur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Magician Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Miller easy. A ton of teams need goaltenders. Burrows is overpaid and Bieksa isn’t going anywhere like mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
You Mad Bro? Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 I feel Bieksa and Burrows are as much a part of this team as the Sedins. Would like it to stay that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickels555 Posted March 16, 2015 Author Share Posted March 16, 2015 "Miller easy. A ton of teams need goaltenders. Burrows is overpaid and Bieksa isn’t going anywhere like mentioned." Wondering what teams you think would pay 6 mil for Ryan Miller if he were a free agent this summer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 I feel like Niemi walks in the offseason and Miller to SJ would make sense for everybody involved. I'm not sure we can get very much value for Miller but you never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orka Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Miller, still got a few years as an elite goalie left in him, Bieksa won't waive his NTC and is also too valuable in the dressing room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComptonCanuck Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 I feel Bieksa and Burrows are as much a part of this team as the Sedins. Would like it to stay that way. i disagree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feeny Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 I'd say Miller, but only if SJ wants him. If not, I honestly can't see any of them moved... nor do i want juice/burr moved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComptonCanuck Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 hopefully the canucks can get 2nds for burrows and bieksa but keep miller he's solid for now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Most tradable is Miller. But players that needs to be traded are Bieksa and Burrows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Juice Burr and Miller in that order. I'd keep Juice if he could be resigned for cheap. Burr I would move just because we have young guys I'd like to see crack the roster next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bohonos76 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Keep Lack. Move Miller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Miller would return the most, but all three could get pretty decent returns, largely due to their leadership qualities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabcakes Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 A difficult choice OP. My first question would be why do you ask us this? They are all difficult choices in their own way for different reasons and would require an essay for each to answer properly. Miller easiest, maybe the best return. Benning not likely to trade because it would be like going back on his word at one level. What is the alternative in goal if he does move him? From here it gets complicated. Bieksa has a high cap hit for a declining asset. His strongest point is his character which hold the most sway with the team he is with. On another team, not so much. He is worth more as a Canuck than on another team. Burrows like Bieksa has a relatively high cap but he remains closer to his peak as a player. Great in the room too and like Bieksa, his value in the room is much more as a Canuck than on another team. I understand why people are looking out of the box for likely players to trade but I think that none of these 3 will move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNeil Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Miller would be Kesler all over again. Waives for a single team.....San Jose. San Jose bends us over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.