Rush17 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 I like the idea someone else had earlier. Take the 31st and see if we can switch our 23rd for the 21st. Might help us get one of the ideal guys we want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight2014 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 I know its not realistic. In my eyes I'm not focusing on Grigs, but more the possibility of McCabe. Who i think will have a good career. Van: 31st overall pick McCabe Buffalo: Lack + Jensen or b level prospect. Its plausible, but realistic? That I'm not sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 I like the idea of lack and Jensen for the 31st and rights to Grigorenko. Jensen has clearly fallen out of favour, so if Grigs bolted, it wouldn't be a huge price to pay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaslundLindenBure Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 I like the idea of lack+23 for 31+21. That is only if a faller is dropping to 21. If there are no fallers then lack for 31 and grigs rights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBackup Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 If take 31st for sure. Snagging a guy like Meloche or Roy, even Kylington if he falls to the second, with it sounding like he might based on attitude alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigturk8 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 I would appreciate it if a trade was announced soon so that I can stop obsessing over this. Please and thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight2014 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 I would appreciate it if a trade was announced soon so that I can stop obsessing over this. Please and thank you! I can barely get anything done Hah! I got Lack trade fever and the only prescription is more cow bell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 If he luongo debacle has taught me anything i expect the trade to happen in 10 months or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 I can barely get anything done Hah! I got Lack trade fever and the only prescription is more cow bell. I bet we need to wait until Friday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 Surely you knew he was joking... Regardless, he obviously wants Cody back hardcore, even at full cap. Why else would he have come out of hibernation? Let's hope there aren't others or it'll be like ants at a picnic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CroSen Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 This draft may be a strong one, however I am not sure why so many folks seem so SURE that a 31rst over all pick will be better then having a Lack on this team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeburn Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 Regardless, he obviously wants Cody back hardcore, even at full cap. Why else would he have come out of hibernation? Let's hope there aren't others or it'll be like ants at a picnic. You are very astute. Truly. Well, except for the hibernation part Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliboy Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 We do not want Coho, please stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 This draft may be a strong one, however I am not sure why so many folks seem so SURE that a 31rst over all pick will be better then having a Lack on this team? Why don't people understand this? Take out grampa's abacus, move 3 beads to one side. We will call those beads Miller, Markstrom, Lack. Now move 2 beads over so you are left with 1 lone bead. That 1 lone bead represents Eddy Lack. Let me know how you make out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 I know its not realistic. In my eyes I'm not focusing on Grigs, but more the possibility of McCabe. Who i think will have a good career. Van: 31st overall pick McCabe Buffalo: Lack + Jensen or b level prospect. Its plausible, but realistic? That I'm not sure. That would definitely be an interesting turn of events. McCabe looks really solid.I think Jensens gonna hit his stride next year but McCabe be sweet. (Not sure if they'd want to part tho) I would appreciate it if a trade was announced soon so that I can stop obsessing over this. Please and thank you! I can barely get anything done Hah! I got Lack trade fever and the only prescription is more cow bell. I feel ya. I'm going nuts. Wasting my whole 3 day weekend constantly checking! Save us lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 @ryanbiech: #canucks want to avoid the Miller/Lack - who will play, who won't etc. - @alexjauld on @TSN1040 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeburn Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 We do not want Coho, please stop. lol, no worries regardless of one's take - pretty sure CDC commentary doesn't rank up there as a prime scouting source for management's decision-making. So, worst that can happen if you read too many line combos with Hodgson's name inserted is the odd physical tremor. Well, possibly a stretch of night terrors too I guess, but that's only if you're very susceptible to suggestion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 @ryanbiech: (About Lack moving) Lack probably will be moved, but I think that the #Canucks brass will listen to anything - @alexjauld on @TSN1040 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekey Pete Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 Why don't people understand this? Take out grampa's abacus, move 3 beads to one side. We will call those beads Miller, Markstrom, Lack. Now move 2 beads over so you are left with 1 lone bead. That 1 lone bead represents Eddy Lack. Let me know how you make out. I would prefer an example using cookies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thema Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 Damn. I'll be pretty upset if they trade Lack, but I guess it's part of the Business. I don't know about everybody else here but I am sure tired of hearing this repeatedly. So our magical new GM signs a veteran goalie for ridiculous money and that goalie proves to be merely ordinary which lowers his trade value to zilch and suddenly the guy who got us into the playoffs with better numbers and bailed us out of goalie injury troubles two years running has to get the chop? Sounds like we have to trade our best goalie because the other two goalies aren't worth anything. Not the way to build a winner sez I... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.