Canuck Surfer Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC Hearing tonight that one of the teams interested in acquiring Kevin Bieksa is San Jose. Yes please; for Tennyson. = Viable prospect who can play + $3 mill plus in cap space. Then we have multiple RHD prospects from which to trade if we can land a prize UFA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstewboy Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC 2m2 minutes ago Don't know how far along it is...but Sharks appear to be very interested in Bieksa. The price would have to be massive for us to trade him anywhere in the West. He is exactly the type of player to come back and haunt a team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Lack Bieska san jose 2nd and a prospect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70seven Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I agree with the thoughts of Elliott Freedman. THe Canucks have talked to the Bieksa camp, but have not officially asked him to waive anything. Theyre treading carefully out of respect for the player. I could see this as a possibillity as Bieksa would then go home to discuss with his family. Should we stay and try to sign a cheap contract next season with Van, or just admit that the end is in sight and get a better deal elsewhere. BXA is a smart cookie. Im sure that he'll give the go ahead so long that all the cards make sense for him to move his family and career. San Jose eh? Dont know how I feel about him playing in the same division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 The price would have to be massive for us to trade him anywhere in the West. He is exactly the type of player to come back and haunt a team. From what? Reopening our window that's been soldered shut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 If San jose wants him they better be willing to overpay. Their 39th and a prospect (Goldobin) would be what I would ask. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 first Torres now Bieksa? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 The embarrassment started when the Canucks created a situation in which Kesler asked to leave. It continues, no escalates, when they ask Bieksa, career Canuck and heart and soul player, to leave even though he clearly wants to stay no matter what. Because Kevin Bieksa runs this team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstewboy Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 From what? Reopening our window that's been soldered shut? I'm sure you wanted Willie Mitchell back after he left the Canucks. People are going to realize that Bieksa is a valuable defenceman after he is gone, the same reason so many teams are after his services at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 im not sure trading bieska will haunt us we need a hockey trade for him so some nhl ready prospect and a decent pick would help our cap space plus build for future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 The price would have to be massive for us to trade him anywhere in the West. He is exactly the type of player to come back and haunt a team. We'll send in Jake to Ferklund him into irrelevance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I think people don't understand there's a possibility of BXA signing a 1-2 year deal and then coming back to Vancouver for a season or two to retire. That seems incredibly logical when you seriously consider what kind of leader he really is. Allowing him to come home in 2 or 3 seasons and retire would be very classy and allow for him to try winning a cup elsewhere while we figure our crap out on the roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 If it's SJ, I hope it'd be more than just a pick and a prospect. Let's get a young roster player out of it. I'd do Tierney and a 2nd for Lack and Bieksa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC Hearing tonight that one of the teams interested in acquiring Kevin Bieksa is San Jose. Man it is finally hitting me that Bieksa is going to be a new member of a team by this fall. Not sure I will ever get use to seeing Bieksa in another jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanTSN Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Because Kevin Bieksa runs this team. Trading the Sedins should be an option too after this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firestorm238 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I wonder if either team would do: 23 + Lack + Bieksa for 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 bieska jensen lack for 9th overal done draft that proporov future 1st pairing dman plus frees 5.7 mill cap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstewboy Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 im not sure trading bieska will haunt us we need a hockey trade for him so some nhl ready prospect and a decent pick would help our cap space plus build for future I'm not saying the trade itself, but Bieksa as a player. The price would no doubt be higher if we were to trade him to one of our rivals. He could also nose dive after being traded, nobody knows. That is the fun in speculating beforehand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sampy Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I wonder if either team would do: 23 + Lack + Bieksa for 9 That's what I'm hoping for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I wonder if either team would do: 23 + Lack + Bieksa for 9 are u kidding me u wanna trade lack bieska and edler for a ninth sorry edler alone woukd get more than a ninth pick bro your undervaluing are players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.