Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Rumour/Speculation] Hudler/Canucks


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Roger Neilson's Towel said:

I'm with you. We need more secondary scoring no matter what, and at this point if someone can provide that without being "gritty" then I don't really give a sh**. Sign them up!

Danny Hank Loui

Hudler Sutter Hansen

Sven Bo Jake

Gaunce Granlund Etem

Dorsett Rodin (Rodin interchangeable wi Jake)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Canuck Surfer said:

Danny Hank Loui

Hudler Sutter Hansen

Sven Bo Jake

Gaunce Granlund Etem

Dorsett Rodin (Rodin interchangeable wi Jake)

I'd be cool with that, although I see it more like:

 

Daniel-Henrik-Eriksson

Baertschi-Sutter-Hudler

Etem-Horvat-Hansen

Burrows-Granlund-Dorsett

Rodin

 

(Virtanen in Utica for further development)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Canuck Surfer said:

Danny Hank Loui

Hudler Sutter Hansen

Sven Bo Jake

Gaunce Granlund Etem

Dorsett Rodin (Rodin interchangeable wi Jake)

Gaunce Granlund Etem.  If I am the opponent - I send out my scoring lines.

All three were inconsistent and at times even shift by shift.  If one struggles - it probably drags the whole line down because there's no stable reference point.  I don't think an all 'youngster' line helps development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jono2009 said:

Unless he has ties to Willie D or the Medicine Hat Canucks, TL not interested lol

I heard his cousin had a dog that was adopted from medicine hat. I think we got this in the bag! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, apollo said:

That's pretty solid. Like you said, our back end can provide the toughness as it stands... So I don't think it's necessary to have a big body forward via trade when we can grab jiri for no cost. Also sbisa belongs in the tough category imo. 

 

That's a great scenario if you ask me. 

 

Alternatively we could go after Russell perhaps and then trade a dman whether it's edler Tanev or gud + something for a duchene or landeskog?

GROSS.  Please, enough of the flamed-out marshmallows..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not against it but not for it either.  At low cap hit and 1 year...2 year max but even less money fine. But honestly rather go to camp with what we have and see who steps up.  If no one does I really think this is a unique year to possibly make a really good trade with a team up against it and with expansion looming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, VIC_CITY said:

That would be amazing but there's no way he signs for that when Perron just got 2 years at $3.75M per. Yes, Perron is bigger and younger but he does not have the pedigree of Hudler. 

Don't you think it's getting a little late for good money?  Clearly that pedigree hasn't prompted anyone to sign him at the asking price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Roger Neilson's Towel said:

I'd be cool with that, although I see it more like:

 

Daniel-Henrik-Eriksson

Baertschi-Sutter-Hudler

Etem-Horvat-Hansen

Burrows-Granlund-Dorsett

Rodin

 

(Virtanen in Utica for further development)

yes i like these line combinations more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do we fit everyone if he signs?

 

Sedin-Sedin-Eriksson

Hudler-Sutter-Rodin

Baertschi-Horvat-Hansen

Burrows-Granlund-Dorsett

 

Etem?

Gaunce?

Virtanen?

 

Etem is a lock to make the team and I think Virtanen comes into training camp and makes it impossible to send him down .

 

Gaunce deserves to be in the NHL imo, but I guess could start in Utica.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...