ShawnAntoski Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 (edited) 41 minutes ago, CaptKirk888 said: You dealt with Jack Nicholson? Good take - whoaaaaaa ! Would seing him in a movie theater count ? Captain Kirk good job during the 94 run - Edited July 4, 2021 by ShawnAntoski 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 1 hour ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: This is a thread meant for discussing the possibility of Nate Schmidt wanting to move on. Anybody arguing about the GMs, regardless of their stance, can be given blame for hijacking the thread. No one knows if Schmidt wants out or not. If he suddenly gets traded I guess we know the answer. Looking at the situation I would not be surprised if he does want to move on. And i dont really blame him if he does. But to give him credit, if true, he at least so far isnt waging that war in the public space. I expect we will see him moved and honestly I am fine either way. He can be much better than he showed in his first year. I think he needs a different D partner and a role that actually fits his strengths as a player. If that role isnt available to him here he will be moved. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 Personally think the canucks are the ones that want to trade schmidt more than he wants to leave. I cant really blame them for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 1 hour ago, CaptKirk888 said: You are also not a fan of facts, apparently I know it doesnt fit the pro Benning narrative but everything I said is actually fact bud. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 4 minutes ago, Bertuzzipunch said: Personally think the canucks are the ones that want to trade schmidt more than he wants to leave. I cant really blame them for that. He doesnt seem to really fit on or off the ice so I could see it being more Canuck based than Schmidt based. Having said that, the opposite would also not surprise me much. He came from a winning organization. I am sure he wants to be on a contender given his age and previous situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 (edited) Trade with BOS?? Schmidt + JV for Debrusk + Carlo + 2nd? Meh. Not sure what's the going rate nowadays. Edited July 4, 2021 by BPA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptKirk888 Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 56 minutes ago, ShawnAntoski said: Good take - whoaaaaaa ! Would seing him in a movie theater count ? Captain Kirk good job during the 94 run - Thanks, but damn that Layfette 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptKirk888 Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 26 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: I know it doesnt fit the pro Benning narrative but everything I said is actually fact bud. Un duh, my name is clearly CaptKirk888, not bud. Great reading comprehension Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 17 minutes ago, CaptKirk888 said: Un duh, my name is clearly CaptKirk888, not bud. Great reading comprehension Notice you dont actually have a conversation or specifically refute anything I stated but just say its wrong with absolutely no evidence presented as to why. Not sure you should be questioning anyone else's reading comprehension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptKirk888 Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 Just now, wallstreetamigo said: Notice you dont actually have a conversation or specifically refute anything I stated but just say its wrong with absolutely no evidence presented as to why. Not sure you should be questioning anyone else's reading comprehension. Yup you nailed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, wallstreetamigo said: I know it doesnt fit the pro Benning narrative but everything I said is actually fact bud. well.. sort of. All we've heard from Nate is he wants to stay. He's never said he wants out. Benning says we want to keep him. So based on whats actually been said, we do know what both parties want. Edited July 4, 2021 by Jimmy McGill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erkayloomeh Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 17 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: well.. sort of. All we've heard from Nate is he wants to stay. He's never said he wants out. Benning says we want to keep him. So based on whats actually been said, we do know what both parties want. Yes but this rumor won't die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 15 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: well.. sort of. All we've heard from Nate is he wants to stay. He's never said he wants out. Benning says we want to keep him. So based on whats actually been said, we do know what both parties want. We wont really know until Schmidt or Benning says so publicly or Schmidt is suddenly traded. Benning was pretty clear he wanted to keep him so if he does get traded its not a huge assumption that he wanted to be. I expect the return and the destination of any move would give a good indication too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 42 minutes ago, CaptKirk888 said: Yup you nailed it. Thanks for the confirmation that you dont have anything of value to add to the conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 3 minutes ago, erkayloomeh said: Yes but this rumor won't die. neither does herpes but its not a guarantee that you have it. The media is making stuff up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 4 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: We wont really know until Schmidt or Benning says so publicly or Schmidt is suddenly traded. Benning was pretty clear he wanted to keep him so if he does get traded its not a huge assumption that he wanted to be. I expect the return and the destination of any move would give a good indication too. but we do know, they both said so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knucklehead91 Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 (edited) 10 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: We wont really know until Schmidt or Benning says so publicly or Schmidt is suddenly traded. Benning was pretty clear he wanted to keep him so if he does get traded its not a huge assumption that he wanted to be. I expect the return and the destination of any move would give a good indication too. My question is, WHY would Nate Schmidt demand a trade out of Vancouver after the kind of season we had, very little opportunity for players to get acquainted outside the rink with all the rules and regulations and the restrictions going on. It just doesnt make entire sense to me why a guy, after 1 season where things got really f***ed up in the world and in the NHL would want out so bad. Its not like he has been here for years and its been the same sort of failure for 4 or 5 years. Our future is looking bright, not grim. It doesnt really make sense to me, especially when Schmidt’s character was raved about and how the Vegas players loved him. Like what is it that would have made him allegedly want out?? Edited July 4, 2021 by knucklehead91 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
‹(•¿•)› Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 1 hour ago, BPA said: Trade with BOS?? Schmidt + JV for Debrusk + Carlo + 2nd? Meh. Not sure what's the going rate nowadays. That package doesn't even get Carlo, let alone Debrusk and a 2nd. Schmidt is borderline overpaid, Virtanen is brutal and there's the whole sexual assault thing. Carlo is one of their top 3 Ds, so no, you are pretty far off from the going rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knucklehead91 Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 34 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: well.. sort of. All we've heard from Nate is he wants to stay. He's never said he wants out. Benning says we want to keep him. So based on whats actually been said, we do know what both parties want. In all fairness… Tavares did say the same BS I just dont fully understand why Schmidt would want out so quickly after a season that wasnt a fair shake. The Canucks had the worst luck when it came to this season and it may as well have just scrapped the Canucks season and shut them down. It wasnt a fair fight for the boys and I think every player in that locker room knows it. They know they are better and know they will be better. So why would you want to leave?? Unless there is some behind the scenes kinda stuff goin on or family related issues that are kept completely private and hush hush. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
‹(•¿•)› Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 Obviously, there's no way for any of us to know for sure what's happening. That said, this could easily be a media generated echo chamber. One BS rumor is parroted by an army of clueless reporters, and now all of a sudden Dhaliwal is "hearing it from multiple sources", or whatever. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts