[PDF] Calgary Flames (P1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2) | Oilers win series 4-1

[-Vintage Canuck-]

 

[rychicken]

19 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:

 

1st intermission....

[greenbean30]

3 minutes ago, rychicken said:

1st intermission....

Hell, I'd say first 7 minutes.

[Hairy Kneel]

Over under? 

[250Integra]

31 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:

 

The question is.. does he end game 2 in net? 

[Dr. Crossbar]

2 hours ago, EP Phone Home said:

I’m happy you said this. As someone who has had to end my relationship with a family member due to their addiction to gambling. It really disgusts me how much this is thrown into our faces.

 

We get it, sports betting is now legal but JFC do we need to get three betting ads in a commercial break? This is the first freaking year this has happened and it’s already overblown. Sure we could say alcohol and fast food ads aren’t good as well but they hardly have as much air time as bet365, online casino, 649 Lotto max etc.
 

 

How can you know your limit and play within it if it’s all you see between the plays? 

Exactly this! Agree 100%. Sorry to hear that about your experience. With this economy tanking, gas prices, and things generally getting harder, this - imo - just sends a horrible message. 

[RUPERTKBD]

1 hour ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:

 

I knew Holland would regret not trading for Halak at the TDL....

[wai_lai416]

i'm actually confused by the application of the rule last night when MT was allowed to leave the penalty box before the other player.. yes i know if 2 players are accessed a penalty at the same time you can declare which players u want out first.. but that's only if it's a normal penalty?? MT and Kane were assessed coincidental minors.. so neither team loses a player on the ice.. and they both shouldn't be allowed to be back on the ice till the next whistle?? just like if Oilers scored on the powerplay.. MT shouldn't and wouldn't be allowed to be back on the ice coz his penalty never resulted in a man advantage?? i think NHL blew the application of the rule on the MT goal

[CanucksFan8353]

Really, really glad we kept Demko now. 

 

A healthy Demko never puts on a joke performance like that last night.  Markstrom can be a bit of a sieve.  Sutter should sit Markstrom until further notice. The Oilers must be defeated at all costs and the Flames have a very, very capable backup tender.

Edited May 19, 2022 by CanucksFan8353

[Hairy Kneel]

Markstrom 4 years 6M

Tanev 2 years 4.5 M

[alt kilgore]

1 hour ago, wai_lai416 said:

i'm actually confused by the application of the rule last night when MT was allowed to leave the penalty box before the other player.. yes i know if 2 players are accessed a penalty at the same time you can declare which players u want out first.. but that's only if it's a normal penalty?? MT and Kane were assessed coincidental minors.. so neither team loses a player on the ice.. and they both shouldn't be allowed to be back on the ice till the next whistle?? just like if Oilers scored on the powerplay.. MT shouldn't and wouldn't be allowed to be back on the ice coz his penalty never resulted in a man advantage?? i think NHL blew the application of the rule on the MT goal

 

Yeah, there was something smelly about that. 

 

IF there was a kerfuffle, and one player from one team was sent off, and two players from the other team sent off from the same event, I can totally see why a coach could choose which of the two in the box could come out from the other team. 

 

But they were from different calls. Kylington was called first for holding, and even though the clock had stopped, the other event happened after, and like you said was coincidental roughing calls, for the same event.  And it indirectly at least, led to a crucial insurance goal for the Flames.

 

Then again, do I really care who wins this series?

[wai_lai416]

1 hour ago, kilgore said:

 

Yeah, there was something smelly about that. 

 

IF there was a kerfuffle, and one player from one team was sent off, and two players from the other team sent off from the same event, I can totally see why a coach could choose which of the two in the box could come out from the other team. 

 

But they were from different calls. Kylington was called first for holding, and even though the clock had stopped, the other event happened after, and like you said was coincidental roughing calls, for the same event.  And it indirectly at least, led to a crucial insurance goal for the Flames.

 

Then again, do I really care who wins this series?

i dunno as much as i hate the oilers.. i don't think i can stand the tkachuk family lol.

[canuck73_3]

Saw some posts on instagram Oiler fans mocking the Flames for blowing a 4 goal lead… And you still lost by 3, so what? 

[Ghostsof1915]

 

[combover]

Come on (c)oilers the bowls full don’t drop another in.

 

just want these two teams to punish each other.

They already both had embarrassing performances it was a just bonus they both happened in just one game. 
 

[-Vintage Canuck-]

 

[HKSR]

1 hour ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:

 

Aaaand there's the Tanev we know....

[UFCanuck]

1 hour ago, -Vintage Canuck- said:

 

Slappin' Sami Salo 2.0 without the Laaaazerrrr

[UnkNuk]

I hope this game isn't another defensive snorefest like Game 1.

 

I wanna see some action!   I wanna see some goals!

[grumpyone]

over/unders for tonight:

goals scored total --- 10.5

Smith's save % ----  .870

minutes before smith gets pulled --- 20

mcd's pts --- 3.5

any others you can think of ?