Kungfudru Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 On 2017-04-19 at 2:06 PM, PunjabiCanucks said: 2017 1st + Tanev? Prob need to add Gaudette to that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFan1 Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Just now, oldnews said: no one is discussing minor Sabres news. they're discussing something much more important - Tryamkin. I already made my opinion on the Tryamkin situation known. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 1 minute ago, oldnews said: no one is discussing minor Sabres news. they're discussing something much more important - Tryamkin. Damn Tryamkin. Here's to Juolevi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kungfudru Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 10 hours ago, DownUndaCanuck said: If I were Buffalo I wouldn't want a kid like that with issues, if it's true of course. Bylsma probably has to go anyway, but if this is true I'd go hard for Eichel. 4th overall pick + Virtanen + Granlund for Eichel That's going hard for Eichel lmao!!! Would you take that crap for your franchise center man??? Honestly that proposal is pretty bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silky mitts Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Kungfudru said: Prob need to add Gaudette to that LoL more like add horvat virtanen another couple picks, prlly wouldn't even get it done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleShield Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 23 hours ago, AV's Coin said: How about Mathews. Who would you take first? All moot now, but I'd have Eichel ahead of Matthews. Buffalo have not had the supporting cast that the Leaves have had this year. In the last 10 drafts (2008-2017), my top 10 are: McJesus Eichel Matthews Tavares Karlsson Stamkos Doughty Monahan Ekblad Hodgson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 If you do some looking it won't take long to see Eichels response to this saying that it is completely false and that he has no plans to leave Buffalo no matter who is coaching. Good example of media taking a spin on something said totally out of context and adding some B.S. for good measure. Read his reply to these comments yesterday and unless he's a liar no story here.... That said it would take Horvat with a package to get Eichel... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattrek Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 On 4/19/2017 at 0:41 PM, morrissex95 said: We're not trading Horvat. Anyone else and I'd do it. Add Boeser to that and I agree. Anyone else I would trade in a heartbeat. Eichel is special, but Boeser and Horvat are too and I've got a "punches through his ceiling" vibe from Boeser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazycry Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 5 hours ago, Mattrek said: Add Boeser to that and I agree. Anyone else I would trade in a heartbeat. Eichel is special, but Boeser and Horvat are too and I've got a "punches through his ceiling" vibe from Boeser. Yup same. Aside from Bo and Brock, I would trade anyone on this roster. Eichel showed he can score in this league and would honestly speed up our rebuild, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuporbust Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 On 19/04/2017 at 8:55 AM, Jaku said: Well then... I guess the Sabres have a big decision on their hands here. I heard there was turmoil between the players and Bylsma, but I don't think anyone outside the organization thought it was this bad. I can't see the Sabres keeping Byslma, no way the Sabres are going to let a player like Eichel just walk away. Edit: Unless something changes between now and then Pretty easy decision actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuporbust Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 12 hours ago, crazycry said: Yup same. Aside from Bo and Brock, I would trade anyone on this roster. Eichel showed he can score in this league and would honestly speed up our rebuild, There is nobody I wouldnt trade for eichel. He is a generational talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleShield Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 18 hours ago, Mattrek said: Add Boeser to that and I agree. Anyone else I would trade in a heartbeat. Eichel is special, but Boeser and Horvat are too and I've got a "punches through his ceiling" vibe from Boeser. 2 minutes ago, cuporbust said: There is nobody I wouldnt trade for eichel. He is a generational talent. Agreed - I mean, is there anyone who would veto Horvat for McDavid? Don't get me wrong, I love Bo, but no one should ever be "untradeable". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Rumor that Jack did not like the coach or Sam Reinhart. Jimmy should be on the phone to trade Tanev for Reinhart. Get it done Jimmy and make up for Tryamkin's loss! PS: Sign his Dad as the new defense coach! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davathor Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 Bad sign, attitude problems blah blah whine whine if the Canucks have 1% chance of getting a player of his caliber they should be on the phone and all in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 12 hours ago, cuporbust said: There is nobody I wouldnt trade for eichel. He is a generational talent. For that reason he's not going to get traded. The GM and the coach already were fired thanks to that guy. And he doesn't like Reinhart? We like him. Who would you trade for Reinhart? 2nd overall ('14), 21 yrs old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
messier's_elbow Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 On 2017-04-20 at 2:49 AM, DownUndaCanuck said: If I were Buffalo I wouldn't want a kid like that with issues, if it's true of course. Bylsma probably has to go anyway, but if this is true I'd go hard for Eichel. 4th overall pick + Virtanen + Granlund for Eichel Lol keep dreaming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 On 4/20/2017 at 7:46 AM, mpt said: What is Eichel going to do stop playing hockey? If he signs with another team as an RFA, they'll just match. Reports are he didn't say any of those things; I believe it because it makes no sense as he has no power in the relationship until he's a UFA Would Buffalo match a 7 year w/ $13 Million cap hit contract? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 5 hours ago, iinatcc said: Would Buffalo match a 7 year w/ $13 Million cap hit contract? They have owners with loaded pockets and plenty of cap space. On the other hand 4 first round picks isn't losing him for nothing. Players really have no power until the threat of UFA or going to the KHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teepain Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Any trade will depend on if we draft 1st or 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 On 21/04/2017 at 11:12 PM, Me_ said: For that reason he's not going to get traded. The GM and the coach already were fired thanks to that guy. And he doesn't like Reinhart? We like him. Who would you trade for Reinhart? 2nd overall ('14), 21 yrs old. Tanev + our 1st this year for Reinhart? I know that's a lot...maybe we'd be better off keeping our 1st and trading Tanev in a separate deal? But I don't think we have any other pieces to make a deal for Reinhart. Just for fun though...how about Tanev, Baertschi, Gaudette and a 3rd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.