Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Proposal] Hire AV!


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, smokes said:

He rebuilt Vancouver once he can do it again. Can handle the media, is a veteran coach and not to take anything away from Green but AV is an upgrade from Green. 

No way. That time has come and gone. NYR let him go because they didn’t think he was the right coach to lead their rebuild, but yet he is the right coach to lead ours? AV will be hired by a team looking to win now. Travis Green is the right man for the job for this stage of the Franchise in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have faith in Travis Green. So, unfortunately, I'd pass on this.

 

I think Coach V would do better work in Carolina or Calgary, at this point, too. He's got too much history. Same thing can be said about people who want Marc Crawford back. They both had their time and it's time to move on, whether we like it or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roger Neilson's Towel said:

No way. That time has come and gone. NYR let him go because they didn’t think he was the right coach to lead their rebuild, but yet he is the right coach to lead ours? AV will be hired by a team looking to win now. Travis Green is the right man for the job for this stage of the Franchise in my opinion. 

Travis is turning all his young players into the same type of two way players stifling their creativity and not allowing them to play the way that got them in here in the first place. Offensive players are offensive players, play them like it and let them learn from their mistakes at that standpoint. Holding back players like Goldobin or regulating Virtanen to the bottom 6 because they are not so good on the back check is counter productive. At least with AV, the offensive players were the offensive players the pests were the pests. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, smokes said:

Travis is turning all his young players into the same type of two way players stifling their creativity and not allowing them to play the way that got them in here in the first place. Offensive players are offensive players, play them like it and let them learn from their mistakes at that standpoint. Holding back players like Goldobin or regulating Virtanen to the bottom 6 because they are not so good on the back check is counter productive. At least with AV, the offensive players were the offensive players the pests were the pests. etc.

AV Spent his first 3-4 years here using a defensive strategy and it worked fine. In fact, his defensive strategy is what made this team great, and what turned Daniel, Henrik, Kesler, Burrows, etc into the players they were in their primes. Defense wins games. Goldobin is also a pretty poor example as well because his poor defending is the reason why he's not a regular in the NHL right now, and the reason why he may never be. Defense doesn't stifle creativity. If anything, a good defense leads to more creativity. Players like Bo are creative because they defend so well. Look at the Isles. One of the highest scoring teams in the league, missed the playoffs because they couldn't keep the puck out of their net. Crosby excelled in last years playoffs because he learned to back check, which lead to more offensive opportunities. This isn't the 80's run and gun hockey, defense is key to winning games today. If your players can't back check, like Goldobin, they won't succeed in today's NHL game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, smokes said:

Travis is turning all his young players into the same type of two way players stifling their creativity and not allowing them to play the way that got them in here in the first place. Offensive players are offensive players, play them like it and let them learn from their mistakes at that standpoint. Holding back players like Goldobin or regulating Virtanen to the bottom 6 because they are not so good on the back check is counter productive. At least with AV, the offensive players were the offensive players the pests were the pests. etc.

I disagree:

 

1) Travis Green has done an exceptional job turning players like Virtanen and Goldobin (who were one-dimensional players) into complete players.  These two specifically did not understand the concepts of competing hard every shift in ALL zones of the ice.  That means backchecking, that means getting yourself positionally ready in the defensive zone, not just the offensive zone.  Playing good defense leads to offensive opportunities because when you are in the right position, and are working hard to be conscientious in your own zone, you spend less time in your own zone, because you will have the puck on your stick and out you go.

 

2) Virtanen and Goldobin weren't held back by Green, it was their work ethic.  Virtanen came in overweight, and had an entitled attitude that he had earned everything.  Green showed him that his POV was going to lead him no where, and with that Virtanen came in and worked hard under Green's supervision.  Virtanen success now has been because of the tough love and lessons Green has put him through.  That meant playing hard on every shift, skating hard in all 3 zones.  Goldobin is starting to figure it out now, that he can't just play good in one zone or when he feels like it.  He has to move his ass at all times to be successful in this league.  Both are finally getting offensive oportunities because they have shown they 1) can compete 2) be responsible 3) have had good work ethic. 

 

If anything I want TG to continue this line of teaching for all our prospects.

 

3) AV implemented a very structured and defensive game in his tenure.  If anything he generally played the rookies guys like Grabner, Hodgson, Schroeder in defensive roles before they saw any time in an offensive role.  And just like Green is doing now, AV made his players earn their ice time and their ability to have freedom in the offensive zone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, nuckin_futz said:

Yeah because AV was so great at integrating young players into the lineup.

 

 

Canucks didn't really have any good young prospects ready to jump in anyways.. And the ones that were, played. I feel like he handled Shirokov poorly, that's about it.

 

Kesler

Edler

Schneider

Raymond

Hansen

Grabner

Hodgson

Tanev

 

Seriously.. during the AV/Nonis-Gillis era - the drafting/prospect pool was horrible.

 

This is the team he inherited in 06/07

Sedin (25) - Sedin (25) - Pyatt (25)

Cooke (27) - Morrison (31) - Naslund (33)

Bulis (28) - Linden (36) - Smolinski (34) 

Burrows (25) - Kesler (22) - Cowan (29)

 

Mitchell (29) - Bieksa (25)

Ohlund (29) - Salo (31)

Krajicek (23) - Sopel (29)

 

Luongo (27)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said:

AV is a stubborn &^@# who couldn't coach his way out of a wet paper bag. Green at least can make prospects show their potential, and celebrates it instead of benching them for showing their talent.

I glad others are seeing this. He refuses to change his tactics, and he's way to predictable. If you want to turn your team around, he's good for that. Might even get you to a conference or Stanley Cup final. But he gets outcoached in the end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...