Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, WalkWithElias40 said:

Now if we get Simmonds this team will seriously look dangerous come down the stretch..

 

when healthy lineup, I would go ..

 

Miller - Pettersson - Boeser

Pearson- Horvat - Toffoli

Roussel- Gaudette - Virtanen

Simmonds-Sutter-Beagle

 

Eriksson, Motte, Zmac

I like Rous, but if Jim could move him for a pick or asset I sure like the look of this too:

 

Miller - Pettersson - Boeser

Pearson- Horvat - Toffoli

Sutter/AG- Sutter/AG - Virtanen

Simmonds-Beagle-Loui

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sutter is to fragile disappears in physical games never finishes a check.
Get rid of him before he’s hurt again. 

He’d be an easy guy to replace with some one (a rental) who can play on the fourth line be defensively sound but still provide a much need physical presence something sutter has none of. Getting rid of  his cap hit for next season would go a long way. AR does  way more for this club than sutter and in the POs AR will be able to provide a much needed forecheck.

We had 7 game winning streak with out him ( since he was injured AGAIN) so I don’t buy he’s in anyway a key to the success. 
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said:

I like Rous, but if Jim could move him for a pick or asset I sure like the look of this too:

 

Miller - Pettersson - Boeser

Pearson- Horvat - Toffoli

Sutter/AG- Sutter/AG - Virtanen

Simmonds-Beagle-Loui

 

 

 

I prefer:

 

Miller, Pettersson, Boeser

Pearson, Horvat, Toffoli

Sutter/AG- Sutter/AG - Virtanen

Motte, Beagle, MacEwan

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRAZY_4_NAZZY said:

 

 

I think it is Miles Woods they are after not Wayne Simmonds

That'd be a good pick up. I don't see the Devils moving on a 24 year old winger with size, 20 goal potential, and a 2.75 aav for 2 years after this season though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Canuckster86 said:

I am hoping for Woods too myself, something that starts with Stecher?

I’d be down with a hockey trade that involves Wood. I’m not down with Simmonds. A forward and Stecher would have to go the other way for sure 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tystick said:

If we're trading Stecher we should be aiming for a solid RD.

I like Stecher but his size + style of play limits his effectiveness.

Are you implying someone would trade a defencemen back for Stecher. Seems kinda of counterproductive 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Devron44 said:

Are you implying someone would trade a defencemen back for Stecher. Seems kinda of counterproductive 

If we're buying an RD from a team, Stecher could go back to fill the void, but we would of course have to add for the upgrade on D.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...