TheRussianRocket. Posted June 27, 2014 Author Share Posted June 27, 2014 Was aired before the draft began...just posted it now cause had a few things to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 This thread has doubled in size in 4 days. Holy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrChill Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 I don't believe Leddy is as good as he appears, Playing behind all that talent inflates his numbers, I'm afraid if he came here he would be exposed He would still be a 5 here baring a big trade, could be a flip for high pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 This is cutting into my morning run..nasty addiction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horvat Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Was aired before the draft began...just posted it now cause had a few things to do What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 I'm also wondering if anyone has the Bob McKenzie interview from the Team1040 earlier today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laoag Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 The reality is there's a 75% chance Kesler doesn't get moved tomorrow 80% of all percentages are false/made up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Problem with Leddy is he is another LHD, no? Hamhuis Bieksa Edler Tanev Garrisson Corrado Leddy Stanton That would be fine if he was so good he would supplant one of our top 5 D. (and for those who pay attention, yes Garrison is OK right side, but better au natural!) I remain convinced, been posting for 2 years, the best solution is a top end PMD prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBH1926 Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Caps going up. Be quiet It doesn't matter that is going up, that is lot of money to be tied in two players. Even if T & K don't get that much, I still don't see trade happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Problem with Leddy is he is another LHD, no? Hamhuis Bieksa Edler Tanev Garrisson Corrado Leddy Stanton That would be fine if he was so good he would supplant one of our top 5 D. (and for those who pay attention, yes Garrison is OK right side, but better au natural!) I remain convinced, been posting for 2 years, the best solution is a top end PMD prospect. I really like Leddy as a piece back, he's a young PMD with upside. Hamhuis - Bieksa Edler - Garrison Leddy - Tanev (young players, and that's a nice balance in style of game) I would want something like TT + Leddy, maybe see if we could also get a 2nd or 3rd thrown in there aswell, that would be a very good deal for us moving forward IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denniskearns Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Why all the hate because of his list of teams? Kesler took a paycut and in return received a NTC. It's contractually HIS RIGHT to be able to demand which team he goes too. All Kesler is doing is using HIS RIGHT to go to where he wants too. Sure he could be a super nice guy and just open up his list to include all teams so the Canucks majorly benefit, at the expense of his happiness. By why would he do that? he's given his whole career to this city so far, played through injuries, battled when no one else did and took a paycut on his last contract. Why should he give more? Would all of you sacrifice your happiness and rights in order to appease your boss and make their lives better? But he's not being asked to waive his "no trade"--he's asked to get out. It's not like Sundin in Toronto when they wanted to trade him but he wanted to stay. If you decide you want out, you shouldn't get to say, "and you have to put me on Kings because I think I can win the cup there next year". It destroys the market and makes the player untradeable unless they take a terrible return. If you insist you have to get out, you should then realize the team you want to go to might not offer enough to get you, so you have to be open to more possibilities. Maybe not all the teams, but not just two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiffyPB Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Problem with Leddy is he is another LHD, no? Hamhuis Bieksa Edler Tanev Garrisson Corrado Leddy Stanton That would be fine if he was so good he would supplant one of our top 5 D. (and for those who pay attention, yes Garrison is OK right side, but better au natural!) I remain convinced, been posting for 2 years, the best solution is a top end PMD prospect. Which is why we ask for Adam Clendening. 59 points in the AHL as a 21 year old (most on team as a skater, 2nd most in league as a defenseman) and capable in his own zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted June 27, 2014 Author Share Posted June 27, 2014 @imacVanSun: Linden on danger of Kesler trade mission turning into Luongo 2.0: “We’re a long way from this becoming a Roberto Luongo saga." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrible.dee Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 He would still be a 5 here baring a big trade, could be a flip for high pick Oh, I agree he's at least a #5 here, I didn't mean he's like pressbox bad And yes, my hope was always that part of the Kesler deal would go to Tallon for #1, If we could get a 1st and TT to keep then Leddy and #6 to FLA, I'd be more then happy, BUT, Trev/Benn are on record (And I know Aquallini is behind it) saying they want a peice to help us now, So that kinda flushes my dream down the toilet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L. Stanley Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 ok Chicago - no saad? no TT? How about Shaw, Leddy, Hartman, Clendenning, 1st for Kesler and our 5th, McNally, Labate We then flip our 6th + Leddy + schroeder to Edmonton for their 3rd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 I'd be happy with any of these bigs Chi - TT,Leddy,1st 2014 Pit - Pouliot, 1st, Bennett Ana - 10th,Thoedore, DSP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 It's been 100% confirmed on twitter and elsewhere that Ryan Kesler will or will not be traded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrible.dee Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Which is why we ask for Adam Clendening. 59 points in the AHL as a 21 year old (most on team as a skater, 2nd most in league as a defenseman) and capable in his own zone. Hmmmm, very interesting, On paper I would take him over Leddy, But I am not expert on prospect development, so I wonder, how good of a prospect do the pro evaluators consider him? Because yeah, on paper: Offense, Defense, Fast, Physical, Transition game, PP QB, he seems to have everything but size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrChill Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 I'd be happy with any of these bigs Chi - TT,Leddy,1st 2014 Pit - Pouliot, 1st, Bennett Ana - 10th,Thoedore, DSP Agreed. I would flip Leddy or Tanev 6th for 3rd (future C) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrible.dee Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 ok Chicago - no saad? no TT? How about Shaw, Leddy, Hartman, Clendenning, 1st for Kesler and our 5th, McNally, Labate We then flip our 6th + Leddy + schroeder to Edmonton for their 3rd Like I've said before, If they haven't put TT on the table yet, Benning should refuse to talk to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.