70seven Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 We need goals... Vanek has shown the ability to add some of those, especially on the PP. If the $$ and term is right, he could be a very decent addition. It would definitely load our right side up, or at the very least give coaching staff some options for the twins, or the 2nd line. sedin sedin eriksson/vanek baertschi horvat vanek/eriksson etem sutter hansen dorsett granlund virtanen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 8 minutes ago, TU90 said: Where would he even play for us.. Not a big fan. Sedin Sedin Eriksson Vanek Sutter Hansen Baertschi Horvat Etem Burrows Granlund Dorsett Rodin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted July 1, 2016 Author Share Posted July 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, Fanuck said: Lucy gone = Kings highly interested. Where does he fit in a Canucks lineup? With either Daniel or Baer dishing out beauty passes from the LW boards on the rush OR cycling because he's a pro-cycler as well as strong player on the rush when he's at his best. Sedin - Sedin - Eriksson Baer - Horvat - Vanek Virt - Sutter - Hansen Etem - Granlund - Dorsett/Burr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 6 minutes ago, TU90 said: Where would he even play for us.. Not a big fan. Sedin Sedin Eriksson Vanek Sutter Hansen Baertschi Horvat Virtanen/Rodin Granlund Gaunce Etem/Burr/Dorsett/Grenier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Aren't there other washed up vets we can have for cheap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShakyWalton Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 They need some toughness up front,,,not another softy....Martin is where I would go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Just now, ShakyWalton said: They need some toughness up front,,,not another softy....Martin is where I would go. I'd take him too. Just not for our top 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoughtysCheck Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 unless Virt not playing on the team this year, no room for Vanek here. Remember, goal is to develop our prospects, not make the playoffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaNuCkSLoUiE23 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 If it's under $3 million, then okay... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 1 minute ago, DoughtysCheck said: unless Virt not playing on the team this year, no room for Vanek here. Remember, goal is to develop our prospects, not make the playoffs I think Virtanen should go to the minors to figure out his scoring playing top minutes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 1 minute ago, DoughtysCheck said: unless Virt not playing on the team this year, no room for Vanek here. Remember, goal is to develop our prospects, not make the playoffs Aquaman wants to develop our prospects and win the Cup and win all the trophies and sell out every night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickels Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 5 minutes ago, ShakyWalton said: They need some toughness up front,,,not another softy....Martin is where I would go. How much "toughness" did Penguins have up front ? Tbay ? Hawks ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 We'd be pining for buyout by January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 11 minutes ago, DoughtysCheck said: unless Virt not playing on the team this year, no room for Vanek here. Remember, goal is to develop our prospects, not make the playoffs I heard Linden and Benning say different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 SIGN EVERYONE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeltaSwede Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 I want this to get done. I don't care what the media will say, I don't care what other fan bases will say. Eriksson and Vanek on the two top lines could be massive. Vanek could be a valuable trade asset as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3aL Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 It would make sense to sign with us for both sides. Sedin-Sedin-Vanek --> RHS goal scorer, will be deployed in offensive situations --> downsides speed, and two way play Hansen --> linemate for faster games Eriksson --> linemate for games the line looks off or struggles PP1: Sedin-Sedin-Vanek-Eriksson-Edler --> Think it would be deadly Sedin-Sedin-Vanek Baerstchi-Sutter-Eriksson Etem-Horvat-Hansen Dorsett-Granlund-Burrows Gaunce Virtanen Edler-Tanev Hutton-Gudbranson Sbisa-Tryamkin Pedan-Larsen Biega Miller Markstrom Its a Competitive IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Gross. If we couldn't handle Vrbata we sure as hell couldn't take Vanek. Dude literally makes his living floating in the slot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxVerstappen33 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 46 minutes ago, Warhippy said: He was awesome in New York...wait no, he was epic in Montreal, no...wait. Oh he was lights out in Minnesota...wait no Man...scores a bunch of points but the most ineffective player since every other soft player people whinge about. 18 goals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueberries Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 39 minutes ago, DoughtysCheck said: unless Virt not playing on the team this year, no room for Vanek here. Remember, goal is to develop our prospects, not make the playoffs Then why sign Eriksson? Goal is playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.