BCNate Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 1 hour ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: The only way I make a deal for Kane is if it involves Buffalo's 8th overall coming back our way. That would be the exact deal I would be looking for....8th and Kane for Tanev and a reasonable + (55th pick?). This is a far better deal than the 3OA from Dallas, or 17th and Kapanen from Toronto that are being thrown around. Kane steps in and is our most talented and impactful player aside from Horvat.... and by a significant margin. 27 YO 30 goal power forwards rarely if ever make it to free agency. If he does, we either won't be the ones to sign him, or it will cost far more on the open market. Just because he is from Vancouver does not mean that he automatically sign with us. Aside from Hamhuis, how many BC born players sign with us out of free agency. If we have the chance to pick up Kane, and one of Glass, Necas, Mittlestead, Vilardi, Makar, Heiskanen, or Petterson in exchange for Tanev and a +, we need to make that trade. The fact that Kane is a UFA at seasons end does not have to take away from the trade value. We can negotiate with him in advance, or they add a conditional pick based upon him signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statman Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 On 6/7/2017 at 11:13 PM, messier's_elbow said: Lol Buffalo doesn't want Erickson. 6 million dollar plug last year. I'm sorry but Eriksson isn't as bad as he played last year. A lot of teams would be happy to have him on their team. He is just not a fit here with where we are. Buffalo is a few years ahead of us and could use a guy like him. 2006-07 Dallas Stars NHL 59 6 13 19 18 4 0 1 1 0 2007-08 Dallas Stars NHL 69 14 17 31 28 18 4 4 8 8 2008-09 Dallas Stars NHL 82 36 27 63 14 -- -- -- -- -- 2009-10 Dallas Stars NHL 82 29 42 71 26 -- -- -- -- -- 2010-11 Dallas Stars NHL 79 27 46 73 8 -- -- -- -- -- 2011-12 Dallas Stars NHL 82 26 45 71 12 -- -- -- -- -- 2012-13 Dallas Stars NHL 48 12 17 29 8 -- -- -- -- -- 2013-14 Boston Bruins NHL 61 10 27 37 6 12 2 3 5 4 2014-15 Boston Bruins NHL 81 22 25 47 14 -- -- -- -- -- 2015-16 Boston Bruins NHL 82 30 33 63 12 -- -- -- -- -- 2016-17 Vancouver Canucks NHL 65 11 13 24 8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NHL Totals 790 223 305 528 154 34 6 8 14 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 27 minutes ago, Statman said: I'm sorry but Eriksson isn't as bad as he played last year. A lot of teams would be happy to have him on their team. He is just not a fit here with where we are. Buffalo is a few years ahead of us and could use a guy like him. 2006-07 Dallas Stars NHL 59 6 13 19 18 4 0 1 1 0 2007-08 Dallas Stars NHL 69 14 17 31 28 18 4 4 8 8 2008-09 Dallas Stars NHL 82 36 27 63 14 -- -- -- -- -- 2009-10 Dallas Stars NHL 82 29 42 71 26 -- -- -- -- -- 2010-11 Dallas Stars NHL 79 27 46 73 8 -- -- -- -- -- 2011-12 Dallas Stars NHL 82 26 45 71 12 -- -- -- -- -- 2012-13 Dallas Stars NHL 48 12 17 29 8 -- -- -- -- -- 2013-14 Boston Bruins NHL 61 10 27 37 6 12 2 3 5 4 2014-15 Boston Bruins NHL 81 22 25 47 14 -- -- -- -- -- 2015-16 Boston Bruins NHL 82 30 33 63 12 -- -- -- -- -- 2016-17 Vancouver Canucks NHL 65 11 13 24 8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NHL Totals 790 223 305 528 154 34 6 8 14 12 There isn't one team in the NHL that would take Eriksson. Having said that, he didn't have a great 1st year in Boston and turned it around. Hopefully he does it again for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statman Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 23 minutes ago, VIC_CITY said: There isn't one team in the NHL that would take Eriksson. Having said that, he didn't have a great 1st year in Boston and turned it around. Hopefully he does it again for us. And 4 great years in Dallas . I'm not saying it would be easy to move Eriksson but he is better than what he showed last year. One bad year doesn't say he is washed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckswincup8 Posted June 9, 2017 Share Posted June 9, 2017 Benning might rather try to get the 8oa + Kane for tanev + 2nd rder/s rather than the 3rd oa It make more sense for him to acquire kane+ 8 rather than just the 3rd oa since hes been vocal about being competitive and need of scoring. Plus they had interest in acquiring kane in the past. He'll probably pull the trigger if pettersson or makar is still on board when buffalo picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calvin's Dog Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 15 hours ago, cdubuya said: Yes... After sending Luca Sbisa for Evander Kane (I think Buff may need to add a bit to this).... I think it would be shrewd to package Baer to Philly or Ana....maybe for one (why not two?) of Fowler and/or Lindholm, or Ghost and/or Provorov Yeah, ok it does look a little silly to think Sbisa gets Kane back. But I would hope JB wouldn't offer anything more. Maybe a conditional pick if re-signed. I guess I was reading too much into the idea that Buffalo really wants him out. I still think they must want him out pretty bad to be talking about moving 28 goal guy. I have heard Buffalo also needs LHD help so thought Sbisa might be an option. Has good skating and physical and yes, adds turnovers! He did have a better +\- by far over Hutton/Stetcher/Edler though certainly played against lesser opposition. But still impressive on a miserable Nucks team. Has shown improvement over last two years and is only 27 and so could still get more consistent going forward. and yeah, I don't expect Baertschi to get any of those guys you just mentioned (certainly not without adding) and also certainly not two of them. Provorov is probably close to untouchable. I think Baertschi would fit in well in both Ana or Phili. Speed scoring touch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormtrooper Steve Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 These tires must be pretty worn out by now. I'm surprised this Kane thing keeps coming up. I guess 28 goals lands you a few check ins. If Canucks truly are interested... just get it done. I'm tired of this rumour. 8th OA + Kane for Tanev and 2nd rounder... I'd consider that. Attitude aside, we need goals. Like it's been said above depends on who's left on the board, but I could see this type of deal being on the table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 On 2017-06-09 at 11:33 AM, BCNate said: That would be the exact deal I would be looking for....8th and Kane for Tanev and a reasonable + (55th pick?). This is a far better deal than the 3OA from Dallas, or 17th and Kapanen from Toronto that are being thrown around. Kane steps in and is our most talented and impactful player aside from Horvat.... and by a significant margin. 27 YO 30 goal power forwards rarely if ever make it to free agency. If he does, we either won't be the ones to sign him, or it will cost far more on the open market. Just because he is from Vancouver does not mean that he automatically sign with us. Aside from Hamhuis, how many BC born players sign with us out of free agency. If we have the chance to pick up Kane, and one of Glass, Necas, Mittlestead, Vilardi, Makar, Heiskanen, or Petterson in exchange for Tanev and a +, we need to make that trade. The fact that Kane is a UFA at seasons end does not have to take away from the trade value. We can negotiate with him in advance, or they add a conditional pick based upon him signing. Just a friendly correction for your quote.. Kane is 25 yrs old. I would love to see Kane and his swagger in the Blue Green and White. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 22 hours ago, Statman said: And 4 great years in Dallas . I'm not saying it would be easy to move Eriksson but he is better than what he showed last year. One bad year doesn't say he is washed up. Best part about Ericsson is he can't really get much worse than last year... should be all good moving forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNate Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 1 hour ago, SilentSam said: Just a friendly correction for your quote.. Kane is 25 yrs old. I would love to see Kane and his swagger in the Blue Green and White. 26 to start the season, but you are correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 1 hour ago, SilentSam said: Just a friendly correction for your quote.. Kane is 25 yrs old. I would love to see Kane and his swagger in the Blue Green and White. Tanev + 55 for Kane and 8? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNate Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 24 minutes ago, Alflives said: Tanev + 55 for Kane and 8? I love that deal, but I do think we give up something else as well. I would add #64, or Subban type prospect. Kane is very underrated around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 1 minute ago, BCNate said: I love that deal, but I do think we give up something else as well. I would add #64, or Subban type prospect. Kane is very underrated around here. I think the Twins deserve to play their final season with an elite guy, who will actually stand up for them too. Think of the Lucic contract, and Kane (I see as a very similar player) is a deal. Extend him a deal at 6x6 and we have him through his prime years. Plus we draft Makar at 5 and Glass/Middlestadt at 8. That's a pretty good deal for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 2 hours ago, Alflives said: Tanev + 55 for Kane and 8? I would do that Alf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 If we can get Kane extended,. there is too much to overlook in his game as a proven 25 yr old power forward.. so much to look forward to in his game.. bring him home for 5 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 Kick! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted January 12, 2018 Share Posted January 12, 2018 https://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2018/1/10/16874242/evander-kane-justin-falk-practice-altercation-buffalo-sabres Sill innerested, @aGENT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 12, 2018 Share Posted January 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Hutton Wink said: https://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2018/1/10/16874242/evander-kane-justin-falk-practice-altercation-buffalo-sabres Sill innerested, @aGENT? For the right price/term? Yup. Canucks have had plenty of 'altercations' over the years too, with plenty of good players. I'm sure Kesler was in the middle of a few. If you could go back in time, would you take him off our 2011 team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted January 12, 2018 Share Posted January 12, 2018 Asking price for evander kane seems to be 2nd+ prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 12, 2018 Share Posted January 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said: Asking price for evander kane seems to be 2nd+ prospect. Our second is going to be top 35, almost a late first. Maybe we trade Guddy for a second to a playoff team, and use that to get Kane? Late second + Goldy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.