Rush17 Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 1 minute ago, qwijibo said: At the end of the day you still need to put the puck in the net. Tanev isn't a need in Montreal, Scoring is Tanev has been working on his shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Rush17 said: Tanev has been working on his shot lol, yeah, clearly, I mean those 16 career goals in 348 games are killer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 Just now, qwijibo said: lol, yeah, clearly, I mean those 16 career goals in 348 games are killer its going to be better this year. hes been working on his shot take Tanev MTL. flip petry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 7 hours ago, Hairy Kneel said: je suis vraiment désolé non' Didn't matter what team a Canadian cheers on. That dude's got heart, passion and that extra gear. Yet another misused English-speaking Canadian in La Belle Province. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 I'd trade Price first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 On 6/10/2017 at 8:12 AM, qwijibo said: lol, yeah, clearly, I mean those 16 career goals in 348 games are killer 16 is still better than 15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 FANRAG SPORTS NETWORK: Chris Nicholscites Darren Dreger’s appearance on Montreal’s TSN 690 discussing Alex Galchenyuk’s status with the Montreal Canadiens. Dreger notes the recent trade rumors about Galchenyuk stems from his “curious development” with the Canadiens, prompting the belief he could benefit from a change. Dreger said he hasn’t heard anything yet to indicate Galchenyuk’s in the trade market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble 6 Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackcanuck Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derp... Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 THE TAN MAN?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E. Lindros Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 I would love for us to get him. They do need a top center which we cant offer. Galchenyuk horvat boeser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Sutter, Hutton, Brisebois, our 33rd OA. For: Galchenyuk, Shaw, Juulsen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said: Sutter, Hutton, Brisebois, our 33rd OA. For: Galchenyuk, Shaw, Juulsen sutter = Shaw Hutton>Juulsen That leaves Brisebois and 33rd for Galchenyuk. No even close. If Bergevin has shown anything the last yeart is that he prefers 1-1 trades. If Galchenyuk goes something really good is coming back. I think he'll go with a + for a good 1C or 2C (so NOT Sutter) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 1 minute ago, qwijibo said: sutter = Shaw Hutton>Juulsen That leaves Brisebois and 33rd for Galchenyuk. No even close. If Bergevin has shown anything the last yeart is that he prefers 1-1 trades. If Galchenyuk goes something really good is coming back. I think he'll go with a + for a good 1C or 2C (so NOT Sutter) Wait. You wouldn't trade a 2nd round pick and Brisebois for galchenyuk?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Just now, cyoung said: Wait. You wouldn't trade a 2nd round pick and Brisebois for galchenyuk?! No, Montreal Wouldn't trade Galchenyuk for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, qwijibo said: sutter = Shaw Hutton>Juulsen That leaves Brisebois and 33rd for Galchenyuk. No even close. If Bergevin has shown anything the last yeart is that he prefers 1-1 trades. If Galchenyuk goes something really good is coming back. I think he'll go with a + for a good 1C or 2C (so NOT Sutter) Ha Q! I knew you'd set me on the straight & narrow :^) You're fully aware I drive a hard fantasy-bargain, where Van's assets are ludicrously dreamy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Just now, qwijibo said: No, Montreal Wouldn't trade Galchenyuk for that. OK thank God. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 ^Another aspect: We need to protect 2 assets; they only 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Just now, cyoung said: OK thank God. Lol lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 1 minute ago, Nuxfanabroad said: Ha Q! I knew you'd set me on the straight & narrow :^) You're fully aware I drive a hard fantasy-bargain, where Van's assets are ludicrously dreamy. I know buddy, I know lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.