Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[GDT] Preds @ Nucks Feb 10 2020 - 7pm Pacific - SNET

Rate this topic


xereau

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, oldnews said:

Derp Alf.

Your protest coincides with Schaller being scratched for a Utica callup - with 5 guys already injured - in the midst of a playoff race.

#Consequence.

In game consequences, like reduced ice time.  Schaller is not exactly the guy who needs to be sat.  There are others who are being rewarded with ice time, who are playing super soft.  LE, Sutter, Rooster, Eddy, Myers, and Benn.  Obviously Green can’t bench this group.  However, LE could definitely sit.  Sutter could play less minutes.  

Lets see after this game just how many minutes Mac and Bailey play.  

  • Wat 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Alflives said:

In game consequences, like reduced ice time.  Schaller is not exactly the guy who needs to be sat.  There are others who are being rewarded with ice time, who are playing super soft.  LE, Sutter, Rooster, Eddy, Myers, and Benn.  Obviously Green can’t bench this group.  However, LE could definitely sit.  Sutter could play less minutes.  

Lets see after this game just how many minutes Mac and Bailey play.  

I think you might be hitting happy hour a bit too hard, too early.

 

Less ice time for all those guys?

LOL.

You realize you just named 2 of the 3 LHD - the other one being a rookie playing 22 minutes a night?

40 minutes for Hughes!!!   Gotcha Alf - I'll pass the note........(to the bartender, to cut you off!!)

 

When you lump Edler, Sutter, etc in with Schaller or LE - you've lost it imo.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Alflives said:

Alf is saying the veteran support players are not playing the right way because they DO NOT fear Green’s consequences.  Because there are no consequences.  LE gets to play with Bo.  Sutter gets to play.  Rooster continues to play.  Eddy is playing like a marshmallow, and still his minutes climb.  

What consequences to you speak of oh Alien one? Like maybe sit Bo, or Miller to prove a point? Release Roussel or Edler ... make up super crappy lines, sit 3 lesson boys each night, and purposely lose to teach the boys a lesson? You do realize you can only do so much with the 23 players on your squad right? No matter what you do 20 of them are on the ice and 3 are watching.

 

Or do you mean sending them to fetch Green's laundry, or picking up milk and eggs for his wife, or driving the zamboni, or like torture them with an ice pick or put em on the rack kind of consequences ... or do you mean like burn down Schaller's house if he doesn't average a fight a game?

 

image.jpeg.27814cfbe54be8c2c3f4867f354ae2dd.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

image.jpeg.a610c9d58d9f3981b75adf0221c34573.jpeg

 

Edited by Gawdzukes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PhillipBlunt said:

Maybe Jim had a talk with Green. If I saw two of the best young players I'd drafted get injured without a single response, I'd be pretty pissed.

And a first rounder he gave up for the gift that is JT Miller chucking his knuckles and risk losing him to injury to show the opponents the Canucks have some backbone...

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Alflives said:

In game consequences, like reduced ice time.  Schaller is not exactly the guy who needs to be sat.  There are others who are being rewarded with ice time, who are playing super soft.  LE, Sutter, Rooster, Eddy, Myers, and Benn.  Obviously Green can’t bench this group.  However, LE could definitely sit.  Sutter could play less minutes.  

Lets see after this game just how many minutes Mac and Bailey play.  

History will show Green will give the same minutes as he did with Virtanen and Goldobin, about 11 minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...