Alflives Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 3 minutes ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said: not sure how. We get a great top 4 D and a great young 3rd line C we also get rid of the 6 mil from Eriksson all we give up is a top 4 D that was meh, a prospect who is looking like a top 9 forward tops and a 2nd round pick. I would pay a 2nd to get rid of Eriksson alone. OEL was a good top four D, but has regressed a lot over the last few seasons. Dvorak is okay, but is he worth taking on OEL and giving up Schmidt, Lind and our second? For us to take OEL (25% retained) we get Dvorak as sweetener. They get Schmidt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 13 minutes ago, Alflives said: OEL was a good top four D, but has regressed a lot over the last few seasons. Dvorak is okay, but is he worth taking on OEL and giving up Schmidt, Lind and our second? For us to take OEL (25% retained) we get Dvorak as sweetener. They get Schmidt. Or garland. 1 for 1 isnt an option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 3 minutes ago, Bertuzzipunch said: Or garland. 1 for 1 isnt an option I like Garland, but who plays Schmidt’s minutes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silky mitts Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 19 minutes ago, King Heffy said: We need to just wait the one year and let them expire instead of wasting assets getting rid of them. agreed just bite the bullet for this year again 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 Just now, Alflives said: I like Garland, but who plays Schmidt’s minutes? U go cheap for a year for a UFA i guess. Bogosian or something. Or you make a trade with seattle after the ED. They probably will have like 5 good dmen they wanna trade away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 2 minutes ago, Bertuzzipunch said: U go cheap for a year for a UFA i guess. Bogosian or something. Or you make a trade with seattle after the ED. They probably will have like 5 good dmen they wanna trade away. Garland and OEL (retained) for Schmidt and late pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 They'd have to retain, or really sweeten the deal some other way. It would have to be a remarkable deal. AZ missed their chance to offload the whole deal last season. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Garland and OEL (retained) for Schmidt and late pick? Nah they gonna need at least a couple prospects and mid round pick id think. Dipietro maybe? They can also take erikkson if were gonna pay all that money for oel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 1 minute ago, Bertuzzipunch said: Nah they gonna need at least a couple prospects and mid round pick id think. Dipietro maybe? They can also take erikkson if were gonna pay all that money for oel OEL requires sweetener. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 Just now, Alflives said: OEL requires sweetener. Thats why we have to have garland or dvorak included and we would need cap space for that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 1 minute ago, Bertuzzipunch said: Thats why we have to have garland or dvorak included and we would need cap space for that I'd consider it if they gave a first round for every year of the contract. Otherwise, hard no. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 Just now, Bertuzzipunch said: Thats why we have to have garland or dvorak included and we would need cap space for that Sure sounds like dumping OEL on any team is going to be very difficult for the Yotes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 Just now, Alflives said: Sure sounds like dumping OEL on any team is going to be very difficult for the Yotes. Yeah i cant see jim pulling the trigger on this no matter how much kypreos beaks off. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 Its kinda the same thing with tampa. Yeah sure i will take johnson but i aint taking him unless we get cernak with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awalk Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 1 hour ago, Bertuzzipunch said: Oof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 (edited) I cant see how this makes any sense for Benning unless there is a significant sweetener and retention for OEL's whole contract. I will say IF Benning has OEL on his must have list, moving out another big cap hit, mid term deal like Schmidt or Myers for him makes a lot more cap sense than prospects and picks. If we are going to have a top 4 that all make 6 mil plus, I would certainly hope it would be significantly better than Hughes, OEL, Schmidt, and Myers. Edited July 8, 2021 by wallstreetamigo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dats hockey Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 2 minutes ago, Bertuzzipunch said: Its kinda the same thing with tampa. Yeah sure i will take johnson but i aint taking him unless we get cernak with him. I’m still In the boat that’s there’s nothing wrong with Johnson it’s just he’s on a stacked Tampa team with to many options Solid top6 player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 Well watever happens hes getting traded somewhere 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awalk Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 5 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: I cant see how this makes any sense for Benning unless there is a significant sweetener and retention for OEL's whole contract. I will say IF Benning has OEL on his must have list, moving out another big cap hit, mid term deal like Schmidt or Myers for him makes a lot more cap sense than prospects and picks. If we are going to have a top 4 that all make 6 mil plus, I would certainly hope it would be significantly better than Hughes, OEL, Schmidt, and Myers. OEL seems to be the only player on Benning's list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 (edited) OEL would love to play in Vancouver which if anything is pretty cool. Petey and Hög and the twins on board now id say his play would most likely improve if he came here. Edited July 8, 2021 by Bertuzzipunch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts