Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Proposal] Roussel for Byron


Recommended Posts

Long time no post for me on here! But I got this idea today and wanted to seek some feedback on it... so here I am!


as the title says, I’m proposing Roussel to MTL one for one with Paul Byron. Here’s my reasoning:


TDLR: Canucks get the better player while MTL gets a French guy with one less year on his contract. 
 

long version:

 

Habs will likely lose Danault to FA and I think Drouins days in that city are done as well. If both of them leave, habs will have 0 Francophone players. I’m not sure how important it is to them to have a French guy, but I think there is some serious consideration by ownership there to have at least someone who speaks French as their main language. Roussel is a decent enough pest but his offense has evaporated and he has to be in sheltered minutes to be at all effective.  Byron, on the other Has decent underlying metrics, is a good pk/2-way winger, and would fit in nicely beside Dickinson and Podkolzin on a checking third line. 
 

the big factor here are the contracts. Similar AAV (Roussel 3 million, Byron 3.4 million) BUT roussel has only one year left where as Byron has two. This matters because the Canucks will be shedding a ton of cap hits after this season (LE, Beagle, Luongo Recap, etc.) with no major RFA’s to sign (aside from Rathbone and Depieteo, who should be cheap) so they can afford to have Byron carry over one extra year.

 

MTL on the other hand, have to re-sign Suzuki after this coming season. It would benefit them greatly getting Byron’s AAV off the books for that year, especially considering it looks like they will try and keep Armia who fills a similar role anyways. 
 

this would give the Canucks a top 12 like so:

 

Miller - Petet - Boes

Pearson - Horvat - Hoglander

Byron - Dickinson - Podkolzin

Motte - Beagle - A Guy

 

(“a guy” is one of highmore, MacEwan, Lind, lockwood, etc.)

 

imo its a pretty decent lineup with 2 lines of high scoring, a solid checking line, a 4th line that can actually tread water, and overall a good defensive group especially compared to last year. 

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roussel from France. So there goes your selling feature.  Byron is an important part of Montreal’s team. He’s a great penalty killer and his  speed makes him a threat. Roussel is all but done.  Montreal passes on this easily 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, qwijibo said:

Roussel from France. So there goes your selling feature.  Byron is an important part of Montreal’s team. He’s a great penalty killer and his  speed makes him a threat. Roussel is all but done.  Montreal passes on this easily 

Yeah I know that but he moved to Quebec when he was 16 and still lives there in the offseason and speaks French. That makes him a French Canadian by definition. If MTL does want a Francophone, Roussel fits the bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, The_Rocket said:

Yeah I know that but he moved to Quebec when he was 16 and still lives there in the offseason and speaks French. That makes him a French Canadian by definition. If MTL does want a Francophone, Roussel fits the bill

I disagree. If it’s that  important to them they can go out and try to get Paquette or swing a trade for Gourde. There’s no reason to take on a useless player who isn’t even Quebec born just because he speaks French

 

hell. If it’s that vital they have 2-3 guys on their Laval Roster they can call up 

Edited by qwijibo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the others said I'm not sold on the notion of his Francophone background being the selling point for the trade.
Given the salary and how Roussel isn't really a positive asset, plus we have Motte or potentially Highmore/ Gadjovich who could slot up the lineup, I would rather give one of them the 3rd line LW spot and keep the bottom-6 less expensive.  Time to put an end to the expensive bottom 6 (Byron is good, but Motte's probably just as fast and smart, bigger, and comes at around 1/3 of the contract price).  I like the look of the following and would prefer not to add more 30+ players (rather just bury Roussel and Eriksson).

Lotto Line

Pearson - Horvat - Hoglander
Motte - Dickinson - Podkolzin
Highmore - Beagle - Lind/ MacEwen  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, qwijibo said:

Roussel from France. So there goes your selling feature.  Byron is an important part of Montreal’s team. He’s a great penalty killer and his  speed makes him a threat. Roussel is all but done.  Montreal passes on this easily 

So he’s from Montreal then right 

 

 

Cheeky GIF by memecandy

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, qwijibo said:

Roussel from France. So there goes your selling feature.  Byron is an important part of Montreal’s team. He’s a great penalty killer and his  speed makes him a threat. Roussel is all but done.  Montreal passes on this easily 

He’s still a francophone...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, The_Rocket said:

Yeah I know that but he moved to Quebec when he was 16 and still lives there in the offseason and speaks French. That makes him a French Canadian by definition. If MTL does want a Francophone, Roussel fits the bill

Half of my family lives in Mtl and I suspect I've spent years of my life there if I were to add up all the time I've accumulated there - this notion that Montreal puts a premium on French speaking players may have  even true in the 70's/80's but it's WAY over-played by people outside of Quebec these days imo.  They, as much as any other fan base,  understand it's a business and any asset that can help you achieve your goal will be considered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Roussel's ability to speak French actually gives him much value to MTL (I think people say that on this board as a joke cuz he literally has no value).

 

Byron was scratched some games in the season but was looped back in for every playoff game (for a reason) and played well. My guess is GMMB will wanna go with the same strategy, sending him down on waivers if required but keeping him around under the assumption that no one will wanna claim his contract. And if they do, then he has a bunch of cap space. I doubt he'd change course to take on a worse player on another terrible deal, even tho Rooster does have 1 year less on the contract.

 

If there is any value in the trade it is exactly that - that MTL gets one less year with an underpaid 4th liner. But I don't think he'll move Byron for a total waste of cap space like Roussel this year as they try to meet the expectations they set last year of making it to the SCF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Devron44 said:

Wasn’t Byron on waivers this year lol. Not saying anything about this thread either way, just thought that was funny. Byron was prettt good in the playoffs 

He was,  it mostly for salary cap reasons. Montreal was up against the cap all year and had to make moves to stay cap compliant.  

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Teemu Selänne said:

I don't think Roussel's ability to speak French actually gives him much value to MTL (I think people say that on this board as a joke cuz he literally has no value).

Assuming he is still literate in French; it's "true French" (as some in France might say vs Quebecois which *some* have a kind of snobbish attitude towards that "dialect").  Myself being sadly not literate in French from wherever, I can't tell the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's an interesting - well thought out proposal imo - but I think I'd prefer to let Roussel expire and target another center for a dual-C third line as opposed to Byron.

 

but I really like Byron - and think the OP has made a solid effort here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Devron44 said:

Wasn’t Byron on waivers this year lol. Not saying anything about this thread either way, just thought that was funny. Byron was prettt good in the playoffs 

some quality players hit waivers imo this year - and weren't claimed, for tight cap reasons....

 

 

that shortie vs Toronto in the playoffs was worth the full 3.4 million in my opinion.

  • Upvote 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...