DeNiro Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 Just now, EddieVedder said: 3 mill is still good for hamonic Yea but he’s a luxury right now. We can replace him and free up 3 mil for some re-signings and some bottom 6 depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddieVedder Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 Just now, DeNiro said: Yea but he’s a luxury right now. We can replace him and free up 3 mil for some re-signings and some bottom 6 depth. Rather use poolboy and Boeser to free up that salary. Hamonic has shown he adds value here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 4 hours ago, EddieVedder said: Clarke + Guenther would do it. Except Guenther is an Arizona prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 1 hour ago, T.Demko said: I'd be ecstatic if we can poach Clarke for the price of Garland. However, I don't think LA would give us their top blue-chip prospect for Garland. They probably could do better elsewhere. after todays Tampa trade, all things are possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 1 hour ago, DeNiro said: Stock the cupboards and gut the team. Having a good prospect pool does not necessarily mean we’ll have a good team. Could be setting ourselves back 5 years with those deals. Having no cap space with declining assets could do exactly the same thing. Personally I don't think this team is good enough to go forward with this roster. It's been a great run, but this team as built isn't competing in the way Florida or the Avs are. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kobayashi Maru Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 46 minutes ago, rekker said: I get what your saying and like I said, he's similar to Juolevi in a lot of ways. Exchange for Motte? I guess it depends on market value for Motte. I'd rather have a second for Motte than Liljigren. I'd rather have Liljigren than a third for Motte. I'd have traded Halak for Liljigren, but I think that ship has sailed for several reasons. I would hope we could get better than Liljigren for Motte. I do agree Lockwood has a good chance of taking over Motte's role sooner than later. I just watched Liljigren quite closely the other night against Carolina. Long ways to go to be a regular NHLer if you ask me. I think we’re pretty close in our evaluation. Motte is not getting a first in any world but I’d take Liljegren over a 2nd. Either way he’s definitely not a sure thing but more of a lotto ticket. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 2 hours ago, T.Demko said: I'd be ecstatic if we can poach Clarke for the price of Garland. However, I don't think LA would give us their top blue-chip prospect for Garland. They probably could do better elsewhere. I would love that too, but I doubt that happens. I'm not sold on Turcotte either. I personally prefer Vilardi. He plays with some edge and is obviously a right shot Centerman. Vilardi, Grans and a 1st or 2nd. I would do the deal. With these prices, we can probably expect something like that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 24 minutes ago, Pears said: Except Guenther is an Arizona prospect. The same Guenther traded for Garland? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 21 minutes ago, Shayster007 said: Having no cap space with declining assets could do exactly the same thing. Personally I don't think this team is good enough to go forward with this roster. It's been a great run, but this team as built isn't competing in the way Florida or the Avs are. That was obvious in September. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 27 minutes ago, EddieVedder said: Rather use poolboy and Boeser to free up that salary. Hamonic has shown he adds value here. The same Poolboy people on here thought was a great signing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 6 minutes ago, Chris12345 said: The same Guenther traded for Garland? The Guenther that was selected with the pick we traded to Arizona, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOFsedins Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 33 minutes ago, EddieVedder said: Whos going to replace myers? The others can go. Different options to choose from. Trade, UFA, Europe or College FA. The most important part is having the cap to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 2 minutes ago, Pears said: The Guenther that was selected with the pick we traded to Arizona, yes. Yes sir! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 3 minutes ago, HOFsedins said: Different options to choose from. Trade, UFA, Europe or College FA. The most important part is having the cap to do that. And not dumping it in while playing 3 on 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 1 minute ago, Chris12345 said: Yes sir! You mean that piece of craperolla bustaroo bonsai who isn't as good as our guy Klimovich? That Guenther? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 Just now, Alflives said: You mean that piece of craperolla bustaroo bonsai who isn't as good as our guy Klimovich? That Guenther? That's the one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Chris12345 said: And not dumping it in while playing 3 on 3. Booze! Edited March 19, 2022 by Alflives 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 Just now, Alflives said: Booze will rot your brain. It only improves cognitive function! Your liver? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 30 minutes ago, Chris12345 said: The same Guenther traded for Garland? Hope Benning kept the receipt! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 There's rumblings that Colombys are interested and they have plenty of good young defencemen. Werenski is obviously out of the question but there's guys like Peeke, Jake Bean and Boqvist who may be up for grabs. Boqvist may be untouchable but he only just arrived from Chicago and is having an alright season. Don't know much about Peeke but he's a 24ish year old right handed defenceman logging big minutes for CBJ and a bit of an all-around guy but he (like most of the team) is getting shelled in the +/-. I haven't watched him but wonder if he's a bit more of a shutdown guy? If he is, there could be a nice trade around Garland for Peeke, even straight up? 20 goal scoring gritty top 6 winger for a top 4 right defenceman? Basically if we're moving Garland or Boeser it should be for a top 4 young defenceman, ideally someone who plays on the right side and someone who can play solid defence (think a young, rich-man's Schenn/Hamonic) but obviously there's not many of these guys out there. We could gun for Boqvist, add more to Garland (eg. Rathbone?) and then roll with this: Hughes - Myers OEL - Boqvist Schenn - Hamonic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now