Dazzle Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 19 hours ago, Provost said: Boeser has a ton of leverage. He can refuse to negotiate for less than his QO, then the team has to offer it or he becomes a free agent. We can't take him to arbitration or he gets to pick the term and will select 2 years to walk him right to free agency. Enough teams want goal scoring and have seen his past numbers to give him a medium term deal for really good money. It only takes one team willing to pony up more term and money to cash in. I think we learned that with Benning paying $1 million per year too much and for 1-2 years too long in term. Like whom? Player Name? I don't think anyone could've foreseen how bad of a fit he'd be, from start to finish. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 11 minutes ago, Dazzle said: Like whom? Player Name? I don't think anyone could've foreseen how bad of a fit he'd be, from start to finish. You continue to be ludicrous in your continued fetish for defending a terrible management group. There is a long list of players we had to give assets to get rid of or buy out. So many contracts had negative value the moment we signed them. Heck we still have another two of them in Dickenson and Poolman while still paying for Holtby. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 1 minute ago, Provost said: You continue to be ludicrous in your continued fetish for defending a terrible management group. There is a long list of players we had to give assets to get rid of or buy out. So many contracts had negative value the moment we signed them. Heck we still have another two of them in Dickenson and Poolman while still paying for Holtby. And halak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 32 minutes ago, Provost said: You continue to be ludicrous in your continued fetish for defending a terrible management group. There is a long list of players we had to give assets to get rid of or buy out. So many contracts had negative value the moment we signed them. Heck we still have another two of them in Dickenson and Poolman while still paying for Holtby. Don't forget Garland and Hughes. You guys only focus on the negative. Let it go he's gone. Let's see how new management does today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian42 Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, brian42 said: This is the cost of previous management &^@#ing our cap situation. We have to let good players on good contracts go. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure_of_94 Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, 73 Percent said: This is the cost of previous management &^@#ing our cap situation. We have to let good players on good contracts go. It’s also the cost of having the 4th highest paid Defence in the entire league, but not really showing it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, Bure_of_94 said: It’s also the cost of having the 4th highest paid Defence in the entire league, but not really showing it... Signed by our... Previous management. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure_of_94 Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, 73 Percent said: Signed by our... Previous management. Yup. Myers shouldn’t be here. If he wasn’t so big, he’d be absolutely awful. He’s too often in the wrong position or makes dumb plays. But his giraffe body covers enough area to not make it as bad as his hockey “sense” does. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure_of_94 Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 5 minutes ago, brian42 said: Garland and Miller are guys you win with. Would rather trade our pillow-soft captain. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 8 minutes ago, brian42 said: If Garland moves we'd better get a big haul for him. Really not keen on moving him unless it's an overpayment. Would much rather move Boeser. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 If we are moving Garland then I would hope that Dickinson goes with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabychStache Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 9 minutes ago, Bure_of_94 said: Garland and Miller are guys you win with. Would rather trade our pillow-soft captain. I used to love Bo. the Bo that fought Nurse. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ilya Mikheyev Posted March 21, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted March 21, 2022 4 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said: If we are moving Garland then I would hope that Dickinson goes with him. After Allvin dumped Hamonic's entire salary with no retention FOR A PICK I literally believe he can do anything 2 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, Teemu Selänne said: After Allvin dumped Hamonic's entire salary with no retention FOR A PICK I literally believe he can do anything Totally... Also, Jimmy R is probably the most experienced POHO in the world, if he wants to move a player, he should, he has actually done all the right things so far... he hired great staff that we are all excited about, he was very patient with the team and watched and waited, his interviews and narratives he gives us through the media are spot on " being a cap team outside the playoffs, a goaltender who covers top a lot of our mistakes, lack speed etc..." all on the money wants cap flexibility - something we never ever had with JB go for it 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tre Mac Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 21 minutes ago, Bure_of_94 said: Garland and Miller are guys you win with. Would rather trade our pillow-soft captain. Based off of what? Miller has been traded twice and TB went on to win 2 cups when they felt he was the one that was expendable, Garland came from Phoenix. There's zero evidence you can win with these guys. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 25 minutes ago, brian42 said: One of three scenarios makes me happy with a Garland move: straight across for an equally aged, skilled, Right Shot D on a similar contract. straight across for a center which allows us to move Miller. for picks, prospects, and cap room. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure_of_94 Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 4 minutes ago, Tre Mac said: Based off of what? Miller has been traded twice and TB went on to win 2 cups when they felt he was the one that was expendable, Garland came from Phoenix. There's zero evidence you can win with these guys. Miller hadn’t arrived yet. Based on the fact that you can’t win with a soft team. You don’t win cups on the perimeter. We’ve been known as an organization that’s easily pushed around for 20+ years now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 3 minutes ago, Alflives said: One of three scenarios makes me happy with a Garland move: straight across for an equally aged, skilled, Right Shot D on a similar contract. straight across for a center which allows us to move Miller. for picks, prospects, and cap room. my guess is it is for picks, cap room and a young B+ player/prospect like a 2nd, 3rd, and a teams 4th best prospect, giving us 3.5-5 mill in cap space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 5 minutes ago, Alflives said: One of three scenarios makes me happy with a Garland move: straight across for an equally aged, skilled, Right Shot D on a similar contract. straight across for a center which allows us to move Miller. for picks, prospects, and cap room. If we are trading Garland and Pearson then might as well see if we can get an overpayment for Miller. Move Boeser and Myers in the summer and we are pretty much done. Let the new era begin. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now