Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Trade] Canadiens trade Tyler Toffoli to Flames for Tyler Pitlick, Emil Heineman, 2022 1st-round pick, 2024 5th-round pick


Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, Jester13 said:

Exactly the point I made in the post you just quoted (although a one-for-one top rhd who is only 26 fits my bill, but I was thinking more of a similar age to Miller of 29/30, which I wouldn't do).

Ya. 26 year old max. Really, this all boils down to the misses with OJ and Jake and the organizations inability to draft and develop D. I don't really include Hughes as that was a no brainer, and still can't believe he dropped to us. 

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, PuckFather said:

In a nutshell, Sam Bennett + 2022 6th Round pick + 2022 1st round pick + 2024 5th Round pick + Emil Heinamen for Tyler Toffoli + 2022 2nd round pick

Not bad and they did well with Sam B. We held on to Jake till he was worthless. At least recovered a couple players with upside for OJ. Really liking Lammikko. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Warhippy said:

Remember Clendenning.

I do. A 2nd rounder who played under 100 games in the NHL. On average only 34% of 2nd round picks go on to play more then 100 games. Meaning that his career statistically followed it's most likely trajectory of playing less then 100 games. 

 

Those same statistics can be applied to Schneider who statistically has 74% of chance of playing more then 100 games. A 5th round statistically has a 15% chance of playing over 100 games. There are going to be outliers in every statistic, but these are the numbers based off a 10 year period. But based off those numbers, I'd definitely be willing to pay more for a 74% chance then a 15%. 

 

I will clarify that these numbers are from the drafts between 2000-2010 and the article was written a couple years ago, so it could be different sets of numbers as time goes on, but I reckon it's a pretty fair baseline. 

Edited by Shayster007
  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Shayster007 said:

I do. A 2nd rounder who played under 100 games in the NHL. On average only 34% of 2nd round picks go on to play more then 100 games. Meaning that his career statistically followed it's most likely trajectory of playing less then 100 games. 

 

Those same statistics can be applied to Schneider who statistically has 74% of chance of playing more then 100 games. A 5th round statistically has a 15% chance of playing over 100 games. There are going to be outliers in every statistic, but these are the numbers based off a 10 year period. But based off those numbers, I'd definitely be willing to pay more for a 74% chance then a 15%. 

 

I will clarify that these numbers are from the drafts between 2000-2010 and the article was written a couple years ago, so it could be different sets of numbers as time goes on, but I reckon it's a pretty fair baseline. 

Yet, you're using draft pedigree as your baseline.  Clendenning was a near .8 ppg average player in the AHL drafted high 2nd round  RHD and....?

 

My point still stands.  Until these kids have played significant seasons, their potential is equal and almost all of it is based on draft pedigree.  Which, as we saw with Juolevi and Virtanen is...worthless.

 

The need for this fan base to absolutely trash our own prospects while lauding others based on the exact same metrics is almost nauseatingly predictable.

 

No I do not mean you, I mean in general.

 

I stand by my statement.  Schneider has as much chance of being a Stuart as he does a Burns.  

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Warhippy said:

Yet, you're using draft pedigree as your baseline.  Clendenning was a near .8 ppg average player in the AHL drafted high 2nd round  RHD and....?

 

My point still stands.  Until these kids have played significant seasons, their potential is equal and almost all of it is based on draft pedigree.  Which, as we saw with Juolevi and Virtanen is...worthless.

 

The need for this fan base to absolutely trash our own prospects while lauding others based on the exact same metrics is almost nauseatingly predictable.

 

No I do not mean you, I mean in general.

 

I stand by my statement.  Schneider has as much chance of being a Stuart as he does a Burns.  

Yes, draft pedagree is a very fair way of judging a players potential, peticularly in a case like you're presenting where all things can look equal. It's the accumulation of numerous professionals who made the choice based off of years of work. I stand by my assessment of the statistics I layed out. You by no means have to agree with it, but I simply can't agree with you saying a 5th rounder has the same intrinsic value as a 1st rounder like in the case we are currently discussing.

 

I sincerely don't think any gm in the league would currently trade Schneider for Rathbone 1 for 1.  I think if someone offered Myrenberg for Schneider they would be laughed out of the building. So I just can't see how their value can be equal. Myrenberg could easily be the next Forsling and be an awesome player, but there is a much higher chance he never plays meaningful NHL games.

Edited by Shayster007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Shayster007 said:

Yes, draft pedagree is a very fair way of judging a players potential, peticularly in a case like you're presenting where all things can look equal. It's the accumulation of numerous professionals who made the choice based off of years of work. I stand by my assessment of the statistics I layed out. You by no means have to agree with it, but I simply can't agree with you saying a 5th rounder has the same intrinsic value as a 1st rounder like in the case we are currently discussing.

 

I sincerely don't think any gm in the league would currently trade Schneider for Rathbone 1 for 1.  I think if someone offered Myrenberg for Schneider they would be laughed out of the building. So I just can't see how their value can be equal. Myrenberg could easily be the next Forsling and be an awesome player, but there is a much higher chance he never plays meaningful NHL games.

The top 15 every single year is littered with handfuls or more of players that buck that trend happily.

 

We'll agree to disagree.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been wondering who has picked up on this and thought it note worthy...............

 

A lot of times during proposals, people will spout out how teams never sign and then trade players

 

Well Toffoli has played a total of 89 games with Montreal before being traded

 

Do you think Montreal is worried about never getting another free agent?

 

I hardly doubt it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, J.I.A.H.N said:

 

Do you think Montreal is worried about never getting another free agent?

Right now they're worried about winning a game, everything's relative to your own situation. 

 

They're bottom feeders who likely haven't even hit rock bottom yet, we're supposed to be a middling team with potential to get better sooner rather than later,  totally different scenarios. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, King Heffy said:

I mean the rest of their top six aren't real men.  Still way too many gutless cowards in that group to expect any kind of playoff success.

How come basically every one of your posts you are calling someone a gutless coward, a cancer, a pathetic person etc...? 

 

You sound extremely miserable and petty

  • Like 2
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PuckFather said:

In a nutshell, Sam Bennett + 2022 6th Round pick + 2022 1st round pick + 2024 5th Round pick + Emil Heinamen for Tyler Toffoli + 2022 2nd round pick

Bennet really broke out this year but then again it seems like anybody playing for the panthers right now is breaking out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Fanuck said:

Right now they're worried about winning a game, everything's relative to your own situation. 

 

They're bottom feeders who likely haven't even hit rock bottom yet, we're supposed to be a middling team with potential to get better sooner rather than later,  totally different scenarios. 

Bottom will happen when they get bumped out of the top 3 for draft picks by us winning the lottery and then Benning stripping MTL of the NHL draft 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Kovalchuk said:

How come basically every one of your posts you are calling someone a gutless coward, a cancer, a pathetic person etc...? 

 

You sound extremely miserable and petty

Name one Calgary forward other than Toffoli who doesn't fit that description.  If me calling out that classless organization offends you, feel free to go to your safe space at Calgarypuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, King Heffy said:

Name one Calgary forward other than Toffoli who doesn't fit that description.  If me calling out that classless organization offends you, feel free to go to your safe space at Calgarypuck.

I searched your post history with the keyword:coward and there is literally 4 pages full of you calling people "gutless cowards".  It's actually kind of psychotic.  Just relax a bit 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kovalchuk said:

I searched your post history with the keyword:coward and there is literally 4 pages full of you calling people "gutless cowards".  It's actually kind of psychotic.  Just relax a bit 

You seem a little too interested in me there.  I'm flattered, but you don't seem like my type.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...