Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Elon Musk Officially Purchases Twitter, Takes Company Private


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Master Mind said:

 

What's being micromanaged in each scenario is so very different that it's not a good comparison.

 

Too many people are eager to compare people to Hitler/Nazi's it becomes ridiculous.

If you can’t make an distinction between Hitler and Musk it’s your problem.

I don’t view Musk as a Hitler type so I don’t even bother with the kind of thinking you show here.

Step up, you can read a few books by the historians instead.

The two historians talking were Peter Englund and Antony Veevor.

They’ve done a lot of research and gave a perfect example usable in discussions like this.

I might have agreed with you if it was my own opinion and I was stupid as feck. B)

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Master Mind said:

 

What's being micromanaged in each scenario is so very different that it's not a good comparison.

 

Too many people are eager to compare people to Hitler/Nazi's it becomes ridiculous.

Who should we be using as an example instead to avoid hurting your feelings?

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 4petesake said:


Literally his first sentence referred to historians talking about dictators and micromanaging . He didn’t mention Nazis at all. Surely Musk’s management style is dictatorial - it’s not like he’s managing Twitter by committee after all.

I didn't say he in particular did in this case. But we see this quite often on the internet, including at times in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

If you can’t make an distinction between Hitler and Musk it’s your problem.

I don’t view Musk as a Hitler type so I don’t even bother with the kind of thinking you show here.

Step up, you can read a few books by the historians instead.

The two historians talking were Peter Englund and Antony Veevor.

They’ve done a lot of research and gave a perfect example usable in discussions like this.

I might have agreed with you if it was my own opinion and I was stupid as feck. B)

I can make the distinction. Hence why I'm not the one trying to compare them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Master Mind said:

I can make the distinction. Hence why I'm not the one trying to compare them.

Why bother about who compares with Hitler/nazis then?

 

If I see someone comparing with them I agree or disagree and discuss the topic. Not that anyone used Hitler or nazis to compare with. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Timråfan said:

Why bother about who compares with Hitler/nazis then?

 

If I see someone comparing with them I agree or disagree and discuss the topic. Not that anyone used Hitler or nazis to compare with. 

 

It was a general comment.

 

Can look back earlier in the thread for comments like those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Master Mind said:

If you want to make a comparison about micromanaging, you should probably pick someone known for micromanaging.

 

Not people known for mass murder.

 

Alternatively you could just point out the micromanagement. No need to bring those two into it. 

Faux outrage! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

All Bots. ;)

Funny story about this.

 

one of the now fired/released engineers indicated that without constant maintenance and a watchful eye, that bots would be able to flood twitter without any sort of security protocols in place to stop them.

 

So in theory this might actually be true

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Warhippy said:

Funny story about this.

 

one of the now fired/released engineers indicated that without constant maintenance and a watchful eye, that bots would be able to flood twitter without any sort of security protocols in place to stop them.

 

So in theory this might actually be true

And yet public polls were how Elon "decided" to reinstate Trump, etc.   

 

That, without purging said bots that were somehow the reason he wanted to get out of buying Twitter.   

 

Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alflives said:

Goebbels knew he was spreading lies.  I wonder if Trump and Musk actually believe the stuff they say?  

I’m not sure… Is this political or is it psychology? 
I don’t want to be part of locki g the thread again.

For me it’s psychology.

 

Trump and Musk are intelligent and often articulate.

At least Trump copies Goebbels psychology strategy. I know too little about Musk.

Musk looks a bit insecure similar to Trump before Trump went all in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

I’m not sure… Is this political or is it psychology? 
I don’t want to be part of locki g the thread again.

For me it’s psychology.

 

Trump and Musk are intelligent and often articulate.

At least Trump copies Goebbels psychology strategy. I know too little about Musk.

Musk looks a bit insecure similar to Trump before Trump went all in.

Trump full on uses Hitler's speaking strategy and apparently was fond of watching his speeches. Which is fair. For all he was he was an amazing public speaker. For example Hitler would emphasize things 3 times...especially the lies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I have read is that many head offices have a high percentage of psychopaths.

 

I am positive that I have worked with a few as the amount is about 12% in corporate leadership when psychopaths only make up 1.2% of the population. 

 

I mean....the way Elon acts, if the shoe fits...

However, I'm not comparing him to Dahmer or Bundy in case anyone gets upset. 

  • Cheers 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...