Harold Drunken Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Maddogy said: If Jim Benning made this signing this thread would be blowing up with insults and death threats. That's because Benning would have signed him to 6 years at $6 AAV and somehow managed to throw in futures at the same time. He would also be signing 4th liners to $2.5 and $3 million per right now. Edited July 13, 2022 by Harold Drunken 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baratheon Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 2 minutes ago, -AJ- said: Someone big is definitely gone with this move. A trade is almost 100% impending now. Either significant roster player(s) or big prospects/picks to move out big contracts. JR isn't doing anything! Blur blur blur! He needs to wake up! Blah blah blah! What's the difference between him and Benning? Hur hur hur! JR needs to... oh wait. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaNuCkSLoUiE23 Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 That’s a lot of money… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ilya Mikheyev Posted July 13, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted July 13, 2022 Mikheyev 30th in goals per 60 mins last year - 1.56 Kucherov - 1.6 Gaudreau - 1.58 Connor McDavid - 1.5 LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 7 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandmaster Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 Garland is a 50 point 5M per player that drives the play. This guy is a 32 point guy. Why did we get this guy for nearly the same cap hit? If we lose Garland for this I wouldn’t be happy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 1 minute ago, R3aL said: Hes an absoluter burner, puck retriever, potentially an A+ complimentary player who's defsivley responsible a killer on the forecheck and PK.. Could become a fan favourite. LET's GOOOOOOO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 6'2" 192 pounds 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 6 minutes ago, JM_ said: Pumped. Really wanted to add this speed to the top 6. Now we can move Garland or Pearson. You got your player (one of them). Congrats Jimmy. 21 goals in 50 games. Good pickup! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nergish Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 Just now, grandmaster said: Garland is a 50 point 5M per player that drives the play. This guy is a 32 point guy. Why did we get this guy for nearly the same cap hit? If we lose Garland for this I wouldn’t be happy. 5’6 vs 6’3. Simple as 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3aL Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, EddieVedder said: That top line is horrendous together the past 2 yrs. No way should those 3 play together Im thinking: Mikehyev-Pettersson-Boeser Kuzmenko-Horvat-Podkolzin Pearson-Necas-Hoglander Dickinson-Lazar-Lockwood / UFA Hughes-Marino OEL-Myers Rathbone/Dermott/Schenn Thinking Miller trade Carolina incoming after the Burns deal if Morrow Necas and a 2023 Pick still on table, Garland for Marino With Trocheck out, they need a C / Elite Talent even more now. Edited July 13, 2022 by R3aL 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Harold Drunken Posted July 13, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted July 13, 2022 (edited) 5 minutes ago, grandmaster said: Garland is a 50 point 5M per player that drives the play. This guy is a 32 point guy. Why did we get this guy for nearly the same cap hit? If we lose Garland for this I wouldn’t be happy. 32 points in 53 games. Edited July 13, 2022 by Harold Drunken 3 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Darius Posted July 13, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted July 13, 2022 1 minute ago, grandmaster said: Garland is a 50 point 5M per player that drives the play. This guy is a 32 point guy. Why did we get this guy for nearly the same cap hit? If we lose Garland for this I wouldn’t be happy. This guy scored more goals than Garland with 24 less games played. Hes also a lot bigger.... 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 Looks like we may come out as one of the winners on Free Agency day. That’s always a HUGE victory given the $$$ thrown around. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baratheon Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 1 minute ago, grandmaster said: Garland is a 50 point 5M per player that drives the play. This guy is a 32 point guy. Why did we get this guy for nearly the same cap hit? If we lose Garland for this I wouldn’t be happy. What if it's a downgrade on Garland so that he can be moved for a RD? (legit question) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 2 minutes ago, grandmaster said: Garland is a 50 point 5M per player that drives the play. This guy is a 32 point guy. Why did we get this guy for nearly the same cap hit? If we lose Garland for this I wouldn’t be happy. Mikheyev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Garland 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 Can’t wait for Benning and Weisbrod to dramatically rip off their Rutherford / Allvin masks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 1 minute ago, nergish said: 5’6 vs 6’3. Simple as Garland is 5'10" and also a year younger. I'd rather keep Garland, personally. That said, I doubt it's as simple as Garland for Mikheyev, even if Garland does go. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 Got to flip Garland now, I hope we don't lose Pearson because he's perfect for the 3rd line whereas Mikheyev slots right into our middle 6, depending on how well Kuzmenko and Podkolzin play. Right now I'd argue we have the best offensive depth in the division. Weakest RD depth though, but lots to change surely. Pettersson - Miller - Mikheyev Kuzmenko - Horvat - Boeser Pearson - Dickinson - Garland Lockwood - Lazar - Podkolzin That's how we lineup right now. Need to fix that 3C and flip a forward for a defenceman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 Just now, Baratheon said: What if it's a downgrade on Garland so that he can be moved for a RD? (legit question) Canucks must know they can move forwards for D help. Or at least they’re sure banking on it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harold Drunken Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 1 minute ago, Darius said: This guy scored more goals than Garland with 24 less games played. Hes also a lot bigger.... I've come to realize facts and statistics mean very little on here. Which is concerning but par for the course unfortunately. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now